Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$14.47
▲ $1.12 (+8.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:35 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$3.72B
Day Range
$13.39 - $14.49
52-Week Range
$8.00 - $23.61
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$10.77
Resistance
$16.10
+7.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 21/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 102.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 7.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
69
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $13.35
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 44 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 16, 2026
Then
65
$12.62
Now
69
$14.47
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
75
Risk
54
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
83
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has centered on its strategic pivot from Bitcoin mining to AI infrastructure, particularly highlighting a $6.6 billion, 20-year lease deal. August saw the company produce 593 Bitcoin but also report reduced holdings after sales, while analysts debated its investment potential amid broader market trends. Stock performance lagged behind crypto and tech indices, though CleanSpark’s focus on AI-driven growth remains a key discussion point.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CleanSpark, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
51
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
48
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
83
Technical
75
Valuation
50
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-16%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
48
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (52) reflects lingering discomfort from a 10.8% drop over three months, despite current positive momentum (+5.5% ROC) and neutral volume. Meanwhile, **FOMO** (36) and **Herding** (46) suggest some investors are cautiously joining the rally, though the stock underperformed peers today. The **narrative gap** (17) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and fundamentals. The key question: Will traders prioritize recent gains or remain anchored to past losses as momentum sustains?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"CleanSpark's August Output Reaches 593 Bitcoin; Holdings Drop After Sales"
"CleanSpark, Inc. pivots from bitcoin mining to AI infrastructure, highlighted by a $6.6 billion, 20-year lease"
"Equities lagged the crypto rally: +2% in August, trailed the Nasdaq 100 (+3.9%) and the S&P 500 (+2.6%); well behind bitcoin (+25.7%) and ethereum (+33.1%)"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Walter Bagehot's documented principles, the model estimates strong liquidity, giving the highest score, while Philip Fisher and Peter Lynch also rate the company highly for quality and growth. In contrast, Benjamin Graham's defensive criteria and Howard Marks' cycle‑aware approach produce more moderate scores, reflecting concerns about valuation and market timing. More speculative or trend‑focused frameworks such as Jack Schwager’s and Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s assign very low scores, citing lack of a clear setup and an overbought cycle. The divergence therefore stems from each methodology’s weighting of liquidity, growth, intrinsic value, and cyclical risk.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 98
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 91
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 78
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 65
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 55
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 47
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 41
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 22
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 9
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
55.2%
Operating Margin
41.6%
Net Margin
47.6%
EBITDA Margin
87.1%
ROE
16.8%
ROA
11.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$42.97M
Total Debt
$644.59M
Current Ratio
4.18
Debt/Equity
0.30
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$6.85
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.41
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Bloomberg · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
MarketBeat · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Blockspace · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Trefis · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Stocktwits · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Bloomberg · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Blockspace · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 17.9.2026
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 69/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CLSK currently scores 69/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CLSK's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 102.2%; Net income growth: 350.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 7.0% of price; -18.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index; %K 99.5 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CLSK.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schultz S. Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 92,070 | -92,070 | $13.34 |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 253,587 | -253,587 | $13.34 |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 73,060 | -73,060 | $13.34 |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 56,338 | -56,338 | $13.34 |
| Garrison Scott Eugene | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 53,596 | -53,596 | $13.34 |
| Monnig Taylor | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 52,004 | -52,004 | $13.34 |
| Carson Brian Jay | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 17,183 | -17,183 | $13.34 |
| Monnig Taylor | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 13,216 | -13,216 | $13.34 |
| Garrison Scott Eugene | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 58,863 | -58,863 | $13.34 |
| Monnig Taylor | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 12,033 | -12,033 | $13.34 |
| Carson Brian Jay | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 36,836 | -36,836 | $13.34 |
| Monnig Taylor | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.9.2026 | 47,351 | -47,351 | $13.34 |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 185,666 | -185,666 | — |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 143,171 | -143,171 | — |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 69,625 | -69,625 | — |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 576,333 | -576,333 | — |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 216,125 | +216,125 | — |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2026 | 95,095 | -95,095 | $12.61 |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 209,042 | +209,042 | — |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 576,333 | +576,333 | — |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 209,042 | -209,042 | — |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 185,666 | +185,666 | — |
| Schultz S. Matthew | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 216,125 | -216,125 | — |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2026 | 27,397 | -27,397 | $12.61 |
| Vecchiarelli Gary Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 69,625 | +69,625 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
77,855,812 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 73,978,672 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology