Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$96.63
▼ $1.60 (-1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:44 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$49.19B
Day Range
$96.00 - $98.21
52-Week Range
$50.72 - $105.60
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$78.43
Resistance
$105.60
+87.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 6/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.01 (3y annualized return 50.8% / max drawdown 25.3%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
CIB’s overall investor score of 81 reflects a balanced profile driven by strong technical momentum and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category (78) highlights a mixed but cautiously optimistic picture: the stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling bullish momentum, while the RSI (60.8) and %K (67.8) suggest a healthy upward trend without overbought conditions. However, the negative MACD histogram and declining CMF (–0.07) indicate weakening momentum, which could signal a potential pullback. The news category (100) is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple mentions in retirement and growth-focused articles, though a single negative commentary from ValuEngine provides a counterbalance. Risk (58) is the weakest category, with a high ATR (3.2% of price) and a 25.3% maximum drawdown over three years, underscoring volatility and potential downside risk despite a robust 58.2% annualized return over the same period.
The stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with an RSI of 60.8 indicating positive momentum, but the MACD histogram is negative and CMF is declining (-0.07), signaling weakening momentum.
This suggests a stock with short-term strength but potential for a near-term pullback, requiring careful monitoring of momentum indicators.
The stock appears in multiple positive articles about retirement portfolios and growth, with only one neutral or negative mention, creating a highly favorable narrative.
Strong news sentiment can drive investor confidence and demand, potentially supporting the stock’s valuation.
The ATR is 3.2% of the stock’s price, and the maximum drawdown over three years is 25.3%, despite a 58.2% annualized return, indicating significant volatility and downside risk.
High volatility and drawdown risk may deter conservative investors or those sensitive to price swings.
StockIQ conclusion
CIB presents a mixed but cautiously optimistic profile, with strong technical positioning and positive news sentiment offset by notable volatility and weakening momentum indicators. The stock’s high annualized return and institutional support are compelling, but the risk of drawdowns and potential pullbacks—highlighted by the MACD and CMF—require vigilant monitoring. Investors should weigh the stock’s growth potential against its volatility and narrative-driven valuation.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $98.32
Evidence: attention score 67/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $98.32
Evidence: 7 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $100.67
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $101.84
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
15d ago · $100.58
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
16d ago · $101.87
Evidence: 8 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
23d ago · $98.63
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
24d ago · $101.01
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
79
$103.26
Now
63
$96.63
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
53
Risk
58
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent English-language media coverage of Grupo Cibest S.A. (CIB) has primarily focused on its stock performance relative to peers, particularly within the conglomerates sector. Analysts compared CIB’s year-to-date returns against competitors like Griffon, highlighting its relative outperformance. No direct company-specific news (e.g., financial results, projects, or crises) was found in the provided sources, which instead centered on broader stock comparisons and emerging market trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Grupo Cibest S.A. American Depositary Shares each representing four Preferred. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
—
Technical
53
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **Euphoria** as the dominant state, driven by extreme positive sentiment (98/100) and significant overvaluation (+25.4% above the 200-day average). The narrative gap (13 points) indicates optimism exceeds tangible fundamentals, while herding behavior—despite underperformance relative to peers—implies selective enthusiasm. The key question is whether this euphoria persists despite weak momentum (-0.5% ROC) or if sentiment will correct when valuation gaps widen. Low volatility (1.03x ATR) and neutral RSI (54) suggest no immediate panic, but the overbought condition could trigger rebalancing.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"CIB vs. ITT: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?"
"Here is how Grupo Cibest (CIB) and Griffon (GFF) have performed compared to their sector so far this year."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some models treating it as a neutral or ambiguous opportunity while others flag it as a high-risk or speculative play. The highest-scoring approaches—Edgar Lawrence Smith (100) and Jesse Livermore (63)—either lack sufficient data to form a definitive opinion or explicitly avoid it due to unclear trends, suggesting a lack of conviction either way. Meanwhile, the bulk of the methodologies—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—all score a neutral 50, citing insufficient fundamental or balance-sheet data to apply their core principles, implying a consensus of 'not enough to decide.' On the cautionary end, the lowest scores—from Marks (34), Morgan Housel (28), and Nelson (26)—highlight red flags like volatility, late-cycle risk, or overbought conditions, framing it as a speculative or emotionally driven bet rather than a disciplined pick. The contrast between the 'wait-and-see' crowd and the outright warnings underscores a stock that either lacks clear signals or carries enough uncertainty to deter even the most flexible investors.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 51
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 22
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 6 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2026 | $1.632 |
| 30.6.2026 | $1.304 |
| 29.6.2026 | $1.304 |
| 31.3.2026 | $1.218 |
| 30.3.2026 | $1.218 |
| 28.4.2025 | $0.574 |
| 27.4.2025 | $0.574 |
| 31.3.2025 | $7.524 |
| 30.3.2025 | $7.524 |
| 30.12.2024 | $0.801 |
| 29.12.2024 | $0.801 |
| 27.9.2024 | $0.830 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Grupo Cibest S.A. American Depositary Shares each representing four Preferred (CIB) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for CIB specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
CIB's technical score is 53/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.01 (3y annualized return 50.8% / max drawdown 25.3%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; %K 19.8 — oversold.
Yes — CIB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vatnick Silvina | Disposition to the Company | 31.8.2026 | 1,059.84 | -1,059.84 | $9.69 |
| Mejia Cardona Andres Felipe | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 75,645 | +657 | $9.73 |
| Jaramillo Mejia Ricardo | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 8,085 | +255 | $9.73 |
| Toro Valencia Juan Esteban | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 10,576 | +462 | $9.73 |
| Escovar Gomez Sylvia | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 41,367 | +357 | $9.73 |
| Zapata Zuluaga Nicolas | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 5,946 | +469 | $9.73 |
| Vatnick Silvina | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 21,585 | +445 | $9.73 |
| Restrepo Echavarria Luis Fernando | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 15,897 | +358 | $9.73 |
| Restrepo Echavarria Luis Fernando | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 357.66 | +357.66 | $9.73 |
| Toro Valencia Juan Esteban | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 462.27 | +462.27 | $9.73 |
| Zapata Zuluaga Nicolas | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 469.47 | +469.47 | $9.73 |
| Jaramillo Mejia Ricardo | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 255.45 | +255.45 | $9.73 |
| Vatnick Silvina | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 444.61 | +444.61 | $9.73 |
| Mejia Cardona Andres Felipe | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 656.67 | +656.67 | $9.73 |
| Escovar Gomez Sylvia | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 356.85 | +356.85 | $9.73 |
| Restrepo Echavarria Luis Fernando | Disposition to the Company | 6.8.2026 | 26,015.88 | -26,015.88 | $8.38 |
| Restrepo Echavarria Luis Fernando | Disposition to the Company | 6.8.2026 | 15,540 | -26,016 | $8.38 |
| Zapata Zuluaga Nicolas | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 5,477 | +521 | $8.84 |
| Vatnick Silvina | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 22,287 | +481 | $8.13 |
| Vatnick Silvina | Disposition to the Company | 16.7.2026 | 21,140 | -1,146 | $8.13 |
| Mejia Cardona Andres Felipe | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 74,988.161 | +74,988.161 | $8.13 |
| Vatnick Silvina | Disposition to the Company | 16.7.2026 | 1,146.24 | -1,146.24 | $8.13 |
| Vatnick Silvina | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 21,140.387 | +21,140.387 | $8.13 |
| Jaramillo Mejia Ricardo | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 21,666.556 | +21,666.556 | $8.13 |
| Zapata Zuluaga Nicolas | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 4,965.321 | +4,965.321 | $8.13 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
643,736 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 710,627 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology