Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$144.49
▼ $1.78 (-1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:16 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$7.90B
Day Range
$143.61 - $146.86
52-Week Range
$84.25 - $157.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$116.28
Resistance
$157.06
CHRD is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+38.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.04 (3y annualized return -2.5% / max drawdown 56.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
43
Risk
48
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) has centered on its stock performance and analyst reactions following its earnings report. The company’s shares rose **11.7%** since its last earnings announcement, sparking speculation about future gains. Wells Fargo maintained an **Overweight rating** while raising its price target to **$175**, while Seaport Global initiated **Neutral coverage**. Additionally, an insider—Director Samantha McKinney—sold **$1.46 million** in stock, raising questions about confidence. Dividend-focused analyses also highlighted CHRD as a potential "high-yield dog" stock.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Chord Energy Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
50
Technical
43
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+17%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CHRD suggests a detached, narrative-driven detachment—euphoria and confirmation bias dominate despite weak fundamentals. Investors appear anchored to an optimistic story (+16 narrative gap) while ignoring deteriorating metrics (revenue/margins). The lack of panic or herding signals implies confidence in the narrative over fundamentals, but the open question is whether this disconnect will persist or force a re-evaluation. Momentum remains neutral, and volatility is subdued, reinforcing cautious optimism rather than urgency.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Wells Fargo analyst Noah Hungness maintains Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) with an Overweight and raises the price target from $163 to $175."
"Chord Energy combines a low valuation with solid profitability, healthy balance sheet, and sustainable dividend, making it a strong value candidate."
"Seaport Global initiates coverage on Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) with a Neutral rating."
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for CHRD reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market psychology. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s near-bullish ‘buy and hold’ score contrasts sharply with Philip Fisher’s near-rejection, as Smith’s long-term patience clashes with Fisher’s demand for proven quality and growth—here, the stock fails Fisher’s signature criteria but aligns with Smith’s ‘decade-long’ horizon. Meanwhile, crowd-aware investors like Charles Mackay and Morgan Housel see moderate excitement or holdability, while disciplined contrarians like Jack Schwager and Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) dismiss it outright, citing either lack of statistical cheapness or no clear edge. Even efficiency skeptics like Howard Marks and Gerald Loeb hedge, warning of overpriced expectations or liquidity risks, while Thorstein Veblen’s low score suggests the stock may be chasing speculative momentum rather than sustainable value.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 58
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 56
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 47
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 42
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 33
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
80.0%
Operating Margin
4.0%
Net Margin
0.9%
EBITDA Margin
34.2%
ROE
0.6%
ROA
0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.74
Cash
$189.53M
Total Debt
$1.48B
Current Ratio
1.06
Debt/Equity
0.18
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $1.300 |
| 20.5.2026 | $1.300 |
| 19.5.2026 | $1.300 |
| 12.3.2026 | $1.300 |
| 11.3.2026 | $1.300 |
| 19.11.2025 | $1.300 |
| 18.11.2025 | $1.300 |
| 21.8.2025 | $1.300 |
| 20.8.2025 | $1.300 |
| 21.5.2025 | $1.300 |
| 20.5.2025 | $1.300 |
| 11.3.2025 | $1.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$139.67
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$139.67
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Chord Energy Corporation (CHRD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CHRD currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CHRD's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.18; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.04 (3y annualized return -2.5% / max drawdown 56.2%); Revenue growth (last year): -7.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -95.4%.
Yes — CHRD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 21 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McKinney Samantha | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $150.30 |
| McKinney Samantha | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 6,250 | -6,250 | $149.74 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 656 | -656 | $150.12 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 178,659 | -656 | $150.12 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 4,102 | -4,102 | $151.66 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 6,120 | -6,120 | $150.65 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 2,826 | -2,826 | $152.34 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 179,315 | -2,826 | $152.34 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 182,141 | -4,102 | $151.66 |
| Brown Daniel E | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 186,243 | -6,120 | $150.65 |
| Kinney Shannon Browning | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 4,019 | -4,019 | $140.00 |
| Kinney Shannon Browning | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 13,560 | -4,019 | $140.00 |
| McKinney Samantha | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $137.08 |
| McKinney Samantha | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $135.56 |
| McKinney Samantha | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 17,030 | -1,100 | $137.08 |
| McKinney Samantha | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 18,130 | -1,100 | $135.56 |
| Brooks Douglas E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | $133.14 |
| Brooks Douglas E | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 10,705 | -8,000 | $133.14 |
| Kinney Shannon Browning | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 2,609 | -2,609 | $140.38 |
| Kinney Shannon Browning | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 17,579 | -2,609 | $140.38 |
| Lou Michael H | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $140.42 |
| Lou Michael H | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 72,699 | -10,000 | $140.42 |
| Dundas Ian C | Gift | 15.6.2026 | 72,171 | -72,171 | — |
| Dundas Ian C | Gift | 15.6.2026 | 1,564 | -72,171 | — |
| Henke Darrin J. | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 1,276 | -1,276 | $145.97 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,956,993 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,729,308 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology