Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$147.52
▲ $1.17 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:33 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$13.52B
Day Range
$145.21 - $147.94
52-Week Range
$144.33 - $241.82
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$144.33
Resistance
$188.67
BWXT is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-15.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 26.7% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $47.22 vs. price $147.52 (-68.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (70/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
9
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
67
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of BWX Technologies, Inc. has centered on its strong position in the nuclear energy sector, particularly as a key player in the growing demand for uranium and nuclear reactor technology. Analysts like Jefferies and Wells Fargo have highlighted BWXT’s potential as a beneficiary of the nuclear boom, praising its naval reactor expertise and commercial expansion plans. The company has received positive ratings, including a "Buy" from Jefferies with an $181 price target, driven by its cost efficiency and strategic growth initiatives.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about BWX Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
67
Technical
9
Valuation
33
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+31
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
BWXT’s psychology suggests traders are overconfident in its momentum-driven rally, with euphoria fueled by extreme valuation gaps (+241% vs. DCF). Herding and FOMO are secondary, while loss aversion hints at cautious holdouts. The narrative-reality gap (44) implies optimism may outpace fundamentals. The key question: *Is the outperformance sustainable, or will overconfidence lead to a correction?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:05 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"BWX Technologies Selected To Develop Design For NNSA Lithium Processing Facility"
"Jefferies initiated coverage on the company with a Buy rating and a $181 price target"
"Expansion of Commercial Operations in Focus for BWX Technologies (BWXT)"
"contract award from the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for BWXT split sharply between those leaning cautiously bullish and those flagging significant red flags. Howard Marks’ *market cycle* and Jack Schwager’s *disciplined setup* approaches both see it as a mid-cycle opportunity with favorable risk/reward, while Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology lens detects early signs of speculative interest. Conversely, Benjamin Graham’s *defensive* and *enterprising* frameworks dismiss it outright, citing valuation and statistical safety concerns, while Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher’s growth-focused rules also reject it for lacking their signature traits. The divide is starkest between the cyclical/technical camp (scores 64–70) and the value/defensive camp (scores 13–37), with even the efficient-market hypothesis and Veblen’s consumer behavior lens remaining neutral—highlighting how BWXT’s mixed fundamentals and volatility create a battleground for opposing philosophies.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 72
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 65
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 46
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 37
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 13
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
22.9%
Operating Margin
12.6%
Net Margin
10.3%
EBITDA Margin
16.1%
ROE
26.7%
ROA
7.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.59
Cash
$499.78M
Total Debt
$2.02B
Current Ratio
2.32
Debt/Equity
1.64
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.8.2026 | $0.270 |
| 19.5.2026 | $0.270 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.270 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.270 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.270 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.250 |
| 18.11.2025 | $0.250 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.250 |
| 17.8.2025 | $0.250 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.250 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.250 |
| 11.3.2025 | $0.250 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$147.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$47.22
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-68.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.8% | $333.09M | $305.59M |
| 2 | 10.2% | $367.16M | $309.03M |
| 3 | 7.7% | $395.25M | $305.21M |
| 4 | 5.1% | $415.31M | $294.22M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $425.69M | $276.67M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$295.29M
Terminal Value
$6.71B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.36B
Enterprise Value
$5.85B
Net Debt
$1.52B
Equity Value
$4.34B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.42
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.37
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Fintel · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BWXT currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BWXT's estimated fair value is $47.22, which is 68.0% below the current price of $147.52. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BWXT's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 26.7% — strong; Current ratio: 2.32; Revenue growth (last year): 18.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $47.22 vs. price $147.52 (-68.0%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Debt/equity: 1.64.
Yes — BWXT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krieg Kenneth J | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 36.14 | +36.14 | — |
| Bertsch Jan | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 41.93 | +41.93 | — |
| Melvin Leland D | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 15.43 | +15.43 | — |
| Richardson John M | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 16.44 | +16.44 | — |
| JABLONSKY DANIEL L | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 1.52 | +1.52 | — |
| JASKA JAMES M | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 28.29 | +28.29 | — |
| PIASECKI NICOLE WEYERHAEUSER | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 7.8 | +7.8 | — |
| Burbach Gerhard F | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.9.2026 | 23.19 | +23.19 | — |
| Maddux Suzanne | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,257 | +1,257 | — |
| Maddux Suzanne | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 5,727 | +5,727 | — |
| Miller Joseph Kirwan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 3,379 | +3,379 | — |
| Miller Joseph Kirwan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,523 | -1,523 | $152.29 |
| Miller Joseph Kirwan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 3,379 | -3,379 | — |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 4,730 | -4,730 | $172.18 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 263 | -263 | $173.00 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 2,407 | -2,407 | $171.21 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 2,600 | -2,600 | $174.23 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 200,084 | -2,407 | $171.21 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 195,354 | -4,730 | $172.18 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 195,091 | -263 | $173.00 |
| Geveden Rex D | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 192,491 | -2,600 | $174.23 |
| Cajade Gonzalo Raul | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 332 | -332 | — |
| Cajade Gonzalo Raul | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 332 | +332 | — |
| Miller Joseph Kirwan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 106 | -106 | $194.65 |
| Miller Joseph Kirwan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 237 | +237 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,974,410 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,895,158 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology