Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$8.25
▲ $0.54 (+7.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:32 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$7.84 - $8.32
52-Week Range
$4.50 - $16.04
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.11.2026
Support
$6.90
Resistance
$10.19
-35.2% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 4/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
BULL demonstrates a strong overall investor score of 83, driven primarily by robust technical indicators and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category scores an impressive 87, reflecting a bullish momentum profile: the stock price remains above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, while the MACD histogram and RSI (66.1) indicate healthy upward momentum. However, the RSI’s overbought status (%K 80.9) suggests potential short-term exhaustion, and the declining trading volume despite price gains raises caution about future buying interest. News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (score of 98), with Bitcoin’s recent performance and institutional coverage (e.g., Scotiabank’s sector-perform rating) providing tailwinds, though the shelf registration filing is neutral at best. Risk factors, however, drag the score down significantly (34), with a high ATR (5.3% of price) and the Chaikin indicator’s negative trend (-0.03 over three years, with a 92.6% historical drawdown) signaling volatility and long-term downside risk. The combination of strong technicals and positive news contrasts sharply with the elevated risk profile, creating a nuanced outlook where short-term optimism clashes with structural vulnerabilities.
The stock price is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 66.1 indicating strong upward momentum, though the RSI is overbought at 80.9. Declining volume despite price gains adds a layer of caution.
Technical strength suggests near-term bullishness, but overbought conditions and weak volume may signal impending consolidation or reversal.
News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with Bitcoin’s recent gains and institutional coverage (e.g., Scotiabank’s sector-perform rating) driving optimism, though the shelf registration filing is neutral. Negative coverage (e.g., price target of $9) is minimal but present.
Positive news sentiment supports investor confidence, while any negative institutional commentary could introduce downside pressure.
The ATR (5.3% of price) indicates high volatility, and the Chaikin indicator shows a long-term negative trend (-0.03) with a 92.6% historical drawdown, signaling significant downside risk.
High volatility and structural downside risk could erode gains or trigger sharp pullbacks, especially if momentum stalls.
StockIQ conclusion
BULL presents a compelling short-to-medium-term case supported by strong technical indicators and positive news sentiment, particularly in the context of Bitcoin’s recent performance. However, elevated volatility, structural downside risk, and declining volume introduce meaningful concerns that could limit upside or trigger pullbacks. The stock’s score reflects this duality: robust momentum and news are offset by significant risk factors, creating a scenario where near-term gains may depend on sustained volume and external catalysts.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $7.71
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 17 to -8 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $7.71
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 3 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $9.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $9.30
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $9.42
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $9.42
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
12d ago · $9.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
12d ago · $9.74
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
13d ago · $9.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
13d ago · $9.74
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $9.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
14d ago · $9.74
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
15d ago · $9.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $9.74
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
16d ago · $10.00
Evidence: attention score 79/100
What happened after
16d ago · $10.00
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
16d ago · $10.00
Evidence: 8 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
18d ago · $9.09
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
18d ago · $9.03
Evidence: attention score 90/100
What happened after
19d ago · $9.26
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
84
$8.94
Now
53
$8.25
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
50
Risk
34
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Webull Corp. centers on sharp stock volatility—its shares fell 9%‑34% amid broader broker‑industry concerns about crypto regulation and a Senate “Clarity Act” vote—while also highlighting positive operational milestones. Reports note a record trading quarter, the elimination of a key regulatory headwind, the completion of a major international acquisition, and the launch of CME E‑Nano S&P 500 and Nasdaq‑100 futures for retail investors. Analysts, despite recent price drops, project roughly 40% upside.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Webull Corporation. News trend score: 68. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
22
Fundamentals
—
Technical
50
Valuation
—
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+17%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests the stock is in an euphoria state, supported by strong 12‑period price momentum (+7.3%), a price 31.1% above its 200‑day average, and high news sentiment (92/100). The moderate RSI (60) and lower‑than‑average volume (0.83×) temper the optimism, while volatility is only modestly elevated (1.22×). The narrative gap of 19 points indicates that prevailing narratives may be more upbeat than underlying fundamentals suggest, hinting at possible over‑optimism bias. The key open question is whether the elevated price level can be maintained if volume remains subdued.
Updated: 09/10/2026, 12:28 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Webull Securities (Thailand) Co., Ltd. announced the completion of the acquisition of shares in Pi Securities"
"Scotiabank analyst initiates coverage on Webull with a Sector Perform rating and announces Price Target of $9"
"Webull filed a shelf registration to offer Class A Ordinary Shares, giving flexibility to issue stock over time"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with Jesse Livermore’s high-scoring (75) bullish verdict standing out as the lone confident positive signal. His model detects a clear price-action trend that aligns with his contrarian, momentum-driven approach, while the rest of the methodologies either lack sufficient data to form a definitive opinion or outright flag red flags. Efficient-market theorists (60) see only weak evidence for active picking, and the majority—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—struggle due to insufficient fundamental or balance-sheet details. Meanwhile, cyclical and behavioral investors like Marks, Mackay, and Veblen warn of late-cycle risks, overvaluation, or speculative excesses, while Housel’s near-zero score suggests the volatility would test even the most patient investors. The contrast highlights Livermore’s focus on technical patterns versus the broader skepticism from valuation and behavioral frameworks.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 7 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
PR Newswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Entrepreneur · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Bankless · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Investing.com · 10.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Webull Corporation (BULL) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for BULL specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
BULL's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; +14.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.5% of price; Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -8.4% / max drawdown 92.6%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BULL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 21 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denier Anthony Michael | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 53,846 | -53,846 | $9.58 |
| Denier Anthony Michael | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 2,332,295 | -53,848 | $8.83 |
| Denier Anthony Michael | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 53,848 | -53,848 | $8.83 |
| James Benjamin Worthy | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 50,273 | -50,273 | $9.02 |
| James Benjamin Worthy | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,150,991 | -50,273 | $9.02 |
| Bishop Walter A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 29,584 | +29,584 | — |
| Bishop Walter A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.6.2026 | 12,500 | -12,500 | — |
| Bishop Walter A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.6.2026 | 12,500 | +12,500 | — |
| Bishop Walter A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.6.2026 | 12,500 | +12,500 | — |
| Bishop Walter A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.6.2026 | 0 | -12,500 | — |
| Bishop Walter A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 29,584 | +29,584 | — |
| Denier Anthony Michael | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | $6.22 |
| Denier Anthony Michael | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 2,386,143 | -75,000 | $6.22 |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 42,471 | +42,471 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 42,471 | +42,471 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 12,500 | +12,500 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 12,500 | -12,500 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 4,719 | +4,719 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 12,500 | +12,500 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 17,219 | +4,719 | — |
| HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.4.2026 | 0 | -12,500 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
32,189,658 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 26,705,518 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology