Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$20.90
▼ $0.80 (-3.7%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:26 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$20.42 - $22.35
52-Week Range
$13.43 - $39.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$16.44
Resistance
$27.42
BETA is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-41.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 136.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$86.27 vs. price $20.90 (-512.8%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $20.90
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 4 to 35 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
63
Value
43
Momentum
52
Risk
54
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
39
Institutional
8
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Beta Technologies, Inc.** has centered on its strong **Q2 2026 earnings**, with revenue surging **146%**—highlighting robust financial growth. Analysts from **Cantor Fitzgerald** and **BTIG** reiterated **overweight/buy ratings** with price targets of **$31 and $33**, respectively, signaling optimism. Additionally, SEC filings revealed **insider share sales** totaling over **$3 million**, while the company’s participation in upcoming investor conferences was noted. No major operational or product developments were prominently featured.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Beta Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
59
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
39
Technical
52
Valuation
43
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+30%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
59
Narrative Gap
+2
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **detached optimism** (Euphoria, 24) despite weak momentum and neutral sentiment, likely fueled by a 24% premium to the 200-day average. This disconnect between valuation and performance may reflect **narrative-driven confidence** (realityScore > narrativeScore) rather than fundamentals. The absence of panic or herding signals implies traders remain cautiously optimistic, though the negative ROC (-13.1%) hints at underlying caution. The key question: *Will the premium to the 200-day average sustain, or will momentum deterioration trigger a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:22 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Cantor Fitzgerald reiterates BETA Technologies with an Overweight and maintains $31 price target"
"Revenue surges 146% as..."
"Beta Technologies insider sold shares worth $1,973,053"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological contrasts. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both rate it highly—100 and 86—because its fundamentals and margin of safety align with his core principles of undervaluation and statistical discounts. Meanwhile, Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score underscores its financial resilience, suggesting it would weather crises, while Edgar Lawrence Smith’s ‘buy-and-hold’ endorsement implies long-term structural strength. However, the lower scores—from Fisher’s 48 (lacking growth/quality) to Livermore’s 40 (contrarian trend bias)—highlight how other schools dismiss it as either overpriced, cyclically neutral, or volatile. The divide between Graham’s value focus and Fisher’s growth/quality emphasis, or between Bagehot’s liquidity lens and Livermore’s trend-following, exposes how the same stock can be either a ‘defensive fortress’ or a ‘speculative gamble’ depending on the investor’s framework.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 87
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 219 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
72.2%
Operating Margin
-1046.3%
Net Margin
-2094.2%
EBITDA Margin
-984.5%
ROE
-41.0%
ROA
-35.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$12.85
Cash
$1.71B
Total Debt
$185.51M
Current Ratio
22.77
Debt/Equity
0.10
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$20.90
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$86.27
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-512.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-391.56M | $-359.23M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-467.42M | $-393.42M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-531.69M | $-410.56M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-574.89M | $-407.27M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-589.26M | $-382.98M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-313.25M
Terminal Value
$-9.29B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-6.04B
Enterprise Value
$-7.99B
Net Debt
$-1.52B
Equity Value
$-6.47B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$24.25
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$24.25
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 24.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
Beta Technologies, Inc. (BETA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BETA currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BETA's estimated fair value is -$86.27, which is 512.8% below the current price of $20.90. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BETA's technical score is 52/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 136.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.10.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$86.27 vs. price $20.90 (-512.8%); Operating margin: -1046.3% (negative); Net margin: -2094.2% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BETA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 22 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stone Michael Robert | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 13,125 | +13,125 | $19.19 |
| Stone Michael Robert | Open Market Purchase | 1.9.2026 | 12,820 | +12,820 | $19.58 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 23,205 | -23,205 | $25.22 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $25.26 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $26.74 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $26.06 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $25.08 |
| Clark Kyle | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | — |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 17,800 | -17,800 | $24.66 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 5,396,941 | -30,000 | $25.42 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $25.42 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 5,426,941 | -15,000 | $23.47 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $23.47 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 5,441,941 | -17,005 | $24.46 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 17,005 | -17,005 | $24.46 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 5,458,946 | -15,891 | $24.24 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 15,891 | -15,891 | $24.24 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 5,474,837 | -15,000 | $23.25 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $23.25 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $17.52 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 5,489,837 | -5,000 | $17.52 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $18.42 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 5,494,837 | -15,000 | $18.42 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $18.13 |
| Clark Kyle | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 5,509,837 | -15,000 | $18.13 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,177,077 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,826,325 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology