Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
18.30 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:20 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
18.06 ₪ - 18.56 ₪
52-Week Range
14.15 ₪ - 25.50 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
14.15 ₪
Resistance
19.88 ₪
-14.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 4/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is below the 200-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
AURA.TA exhibits a **strong technical profile** (85/100) driven by sustained upward momentum, with the stock trading above both its 50-day (10.2%) and 200-day (15.8%) moving averages while maintaining a positive MACD histogram (0.42) and an ADX of 47.0, indicating a robust uptrend. However, the RSI (80.3) and %K (96.8) signal overbought conditions, suggesting potential short-term consolidation or reversal pressure. The **risk category** (42/100) highlights volatility (ATR: 4.5% of price) and a historically volatile performance, with a Calmar ratio of 0.84—reflecting a 3-year annualized return of 37.5% offset by a 44.6% peak drawdown. Meanwhile, the **news category** (50/100) lacks quantifiable data, leaving sentiment and external factors unassessed. The overall **investor score of 71** reflects a balanced mix of strong technical trends and elevated risk/volatility, tempered by a lack of news-driven catalysts.
The stock demonstrates clear bullish momentum with prices above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day), a positive MACD histogram, and strong trend confirmation (ADX 47.0), though RSI and %K indicate overbought conditions.
Technical strength suggests sustained upward pressure, but overbought signals may limit further short-term gains or trigger pullbacks.
No available news or qualitative data points are provided to evaluate sentiment, company developments, or external catalysts.
Lack of news data means the stock’s performance is driven purely by technicals and historical volatility, with no context for future catalysts.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility (ATR 4.5% of price) and a historically volatile performance, with a Calmar ratio of 0.84 (3-year annualized return: 37.5%, max drawdown: 44.6%).
High volatility and drawdown risk suggest potential for sharp corrections despite strong returns, requiring cautious positioning.
StockIQ conclusion
AURA.TA presents a **strong technical setup** with clear upward momentum, supported by relative outperformance and trend strength, but its risk profile is elevated due to volatility and historical drawdowns. The lack of news-driven context leaves the stock reliant on technicals alone, while overbought conditions introduce near-term caution. Investors should monitor volatility trends and news developments to assess whether the current strength persists or reverses.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
49
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING AURA.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
7
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
49
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests **FOMO** dominates, driven by strong momentum and technical signals (RSI 65, Bollinger %B 0.76) that may lure buyers despite neutral volume. The **narrative gap** (64 vs. 50) hints at overestimation of positive momentum, while **herding** signals lagging participation. The key question: *Will momentum sustain, or will the 6.8% resistance test trigger profit-taking?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:28 PM
What could change this?
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that Smith, Mackay and Marks see relatively favorable signals—Smith can’t form a full read due to missing dividend/growth data, Mackay notes no crowd mania, and Marks finds risk reasonably priced—while Livermore and Schwager perceive no clear trend or edge. The classic value‑oriented thinkers such as Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Veblen and Graham‑Enterprising all score at the neutral midpoint because essential balance‑sheet, growth, or insider information is unavailable for a proper analysis. In contrast, the efficient‑market view of Malkiel & Bogle, Nelson’s cycle assessment, Loeb’s risk warning, and Housel’s volatility concern all produce low or zero scores, reflecting their emphasis on market efficiency, overbought cycles, capital protection, and volatility tolerance. These divergent conclusions stem mainly from differing data requirements and risk tolerances embedded in each methodology rather than any single unified judgment about the stock.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 53
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 28
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 10
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.9.2026 | 8.799 ₪ |
| 31.3.2026 | 10.500 ₪ |
| 30.3.2026 | 10.500 ₪ |
| 1.9.2025 | 7.005 ₪ |
| 31.8.2025 | 7.005 ₪ |
| 21.4.2025 | 7.085 ₪ |
| 20.4.2025 | 7.085 ₪ |
| 20.10.2024 | 7.161 ₪ |
| 19.10.2024 | 7.161 ₪ |
| 16.4.2024 | 7.163 ₪ |
| 15.4.2024 | 7.163 ₪ |
| 5.9.2023 | 3.818 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Aura Investments Ltd (AURA.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for AURA.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
AURA.TA's technical score is 49/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; RSI 58.9 — healthy positive momentum; +3.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — AURA.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology