Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$219.31
▲ $4.29 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/21 12:22 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$11.16B
Day Range
$213.78 - $220.00
52-Week Range
$101.79 - $237.33
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$194.45
Resistance
$230.45
+78.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 49.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$62.58 vs. price $219.31 (-128.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
80
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
42
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Arrow Electronics, Inc. has primarily centered on its strategic expansions and market positioning. Notably, the company expanded its distribution rights for **HPE Networking** across North America and EMEA, broadening its portfolio in enterprise infrastructure. Analysts also discussed Arrow’s valuation—highlighting its **10x earnings multiple**—and whether it remains undervalued amid semiconductor recovery speculation. Broker upgrades and broader industry trends, including AI-driven demand, indirectly influenced its stock discussions, but no major operational or financial crises were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Arrow Electronics, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 17 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
42
Fundamentals
42
Technical
80
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+35
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant euphoria—backed by a 27.5% premium over the 200-day average and strong sentiment—suggests investors are prioritizing short-term gains over fundamentals. FOMO is active but tempered by moderate volume and RSI, while overconfidence hints at detached pricing. The 27-point narrative gap (64 vs. 37) implies a disconnect between market enthusiasm and underlying reality. The key question: will momentum sustain itself, or will fundamentals reassert themselves?
Updated: 09/04/2026, 10:50 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"broker rating upgrades with strong projected earnings growth"
"Arrow Electronics has been awarded distribution rights for the HPE Networking product portfolio"
"Arrow Electronics (ARW) Trades at 10x Earnings"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with Peter Lynch standing alone as a strong growth candidate (79) while nearly every other approach flags significant concerns. Lynch’s high score suggests he sees untapped upside in the stock’s price relative to its growth potential, contrasting sharply with Fisher (18) and Schwager (17), who dismiss it outright for lacking the quality or technical setup they prioritized. The middle ground—where Graham (50), Malkiel/Bogle (55), and even Veblen (51)—cautiously mixed signals—reflects uncertainty over profitability, valuation, or market timing, while the lowest scorers (Nelson 13, Marks-cycle 20) warn of overvaluation or late-cycle risks. Only Lynch’s growth-driven optimism clashes with the broader consensus of risk aversion, volatility concerns, and weak fundamental or technical signals.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 51
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 49
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 46
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 44
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 41
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 31
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 24
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 23
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 18
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 261 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$194.45
Range Bottom
$230.45
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
11.2%
Operating Margin
2.7%
Net Margin
1.9%
EBITDA Margin
3.1%
ROE
8.7%
ROA
2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$11.03
Cash
$306.47M
Total Debt
$3.09B
Current Ratio
1.36
Debt/Equity
0.47
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$219.31
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$62.58
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-128.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-35.34M | $-32.43M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-34.24M | $-28.82M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-33.81M | $-26.11M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-34.02M | $-24.10M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-34.87M | $-22.67M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-37.20M
Terminal Value
$-549.94M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-357.42M
Enterprise Value
$-491.55M
Net Debt
$2.78B
Equity Value
$-3.27B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$126.01
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$83.97
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 17 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARW currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ARW's estimated fair value is -$62.58, which is 128.5% below the current price of $219.31. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ARW's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 49.9%; Net income growth: 45.7%; Debt/equity: 0.47.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$62.58 vs. price $219.31 (-128.5%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Free cash flow growth: -103.6%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ARW.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Claude Carine Lamercie | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $209.85 |
| Lowe Carol P | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 163.56 | +163.56 | — |
| Gunby Steven Henry | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 128.51 | +128.51 | — |
| Kerin Andrew Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 146.03 | +146.03 | — |
| Hayford Michael D | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 128.51 | +128.51 | — |
| Zech Gretchen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.6.2026 | 0 | -14,331 | — |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 21,670 | -6,600 | $228.92 |
| Zech Gretchen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.6.2026 | 36,001 | +14,331 | $81.05 |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 14,331 | -14,331 | $228.36 |
| Zech Gretchen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.6.2026 | 14,331 | -14,331 | — |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 6,600 | -6,600 | $228.92 |
| Zech Gretchen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.6.2026 | 14,331 | +14,331 | $81.05 |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 28,270 | -4,600 | $215.15 |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 4,600 | -4,600 | $215.15 |
| Jean-Claude Carine Lamercie | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 12,626 | -3,000 | $216.00 |
| Jean-Claude Carine Lamercie | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $216.00 |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 32,870 | -16,000 | $212.08 |
| Zech Gretchen | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 16,000 | -16,000 | $212.08 |
| Nowak Eric | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 48,835 | -3,473 | $210.99 |
| Nowak Eric | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 3,473 | -3,473 | $210.99 |
| Hayford Michael D | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 1,927 | +132 | — |
| Lowe Carol P | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 4,610 | +168 | — |
| Kerin Andrew Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 14,610 | +150 | — |
| Gunby Steven Henry | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 9,175 | +132 | — |
| Gunby Steven Henry | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 131.98 | +131.98 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,486,000 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,333,076 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology