Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$8.73
▲ $0.94 (+12.1%)
Market data updated: 09/22 02:24 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$1.20B
Day Range
$8.28 - $8.79
52-Week Range
$5.57 - $12.08
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$7.06
Resistance
$10.29
ARHS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-21.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 48.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $6.81 vs. price $8.73 (-22.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
72
Risk
34
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
48
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Arhaus, Inc. has centered on its **40th-anniversary Fall 2026 collection**, highlighting bold design updates, expanded customization—including its Made-to-Order Stone program—and efforts to attract a luxury customer base through innovation. The company also faced broader market volatility, with its stock declining alongside peers amid rising oil prices and inflation concerns. Overall, themes include product evolution and strategic growth amid economic uncertainty.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Arhaus, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
48
Technical
72
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests detached optimism (Euphoria/Overconfidence) driven by a +28% premium to DCF fair value, despite lagging momentum. The narrative gap (11 points) hints at a disconnect between perceived potential and fundamentals. Key question: Is the premium justified by future growth, or is it a bubble waiting to correct? Low volatility and neutral RSI rule out panic, but the absence of FOMO or herding signals suggests caution rather than euphoria contagion.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 08:20 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Arhaus launched its Fall 2026 Collection in celebration of the company’s 40th anniversary with bold design directions and expanded personalization."
"ARHS is pairing product innovation and customization with its signature design aesthetic to deepen luxury customer appeal."
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and cautious views on ARHS. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score (84) suggests the stock is near a cyclical low, aligning with his contrarian, oversold-focused approach, while Charles Mackay’s moderate score (67) hints at crowd-driven excitement—though not yet at extreme levels. In contrast, the majority of investors—from the efficient-market skeptics (Malkiel/Bogle at 52) to the strict value purists (Graham at 18)—see little compelling reason to deviate from broader trends or fundamentals, with many flagging risks like overvaluation, weak trends, or liquidity concerns. Fisher, Marks, and Lynch all score below 45, implying the stock lacks the growth, margin of safety, or structural advantage they’d demand, while only Nelson’s cyclical optimism stands out as a clear outlier.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 51
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 40
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 25
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 22
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 14
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
38.9%
Operating Margin
6.4%
Net Margin
4.9%
EBITDA Margin
9.8%
ROE
16.1%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.48
Cash
$253.36M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.37
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.3.2026 | $0.350 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.350 |
| 20.3.2024 | $0.500 |
| 19.3.2024 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$8.73
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$6.81
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-22.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.0% | $61.34M | $56.27M |
| 2 | 3.6% | $63.56M | $53.50M |
| 3 | 3.2% | $65.63M | $50.68M |
| 4 | 2.9% | $67.51M | $47.83M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $69.20M | $44.98M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$58.98M
Terminal Value
$1.09B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$709.23M
Enterprise Value
$962.48M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$962.48M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.88
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 5 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Barrons.com · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockStory · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARHS currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ARHS's estimated fair value is $6.81, which is 22.0% below the current price of $8.73. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ARHS's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 48.4%; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $6.81 vs. price $8.73 (-22.0%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.5% of price.
Yes — ARHS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keyes Richard Patrick | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 17,089 | +17,089 | — |
| Keyes Richard Patrick | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 17,089 | +17,089 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.7.2026 | 22,960 | -22,960 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.7.2026 | 22,960 | +22,960 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.7.2026 | 97,803 | +22,960 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.7.2026 | 0 | -22,960 | — |
| Hyde Andrea | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | -16,110 | — |
| Hyde Andrea | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | +16,110 | — |
| Hyde Andrea | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| Hyde Andrea | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | -832 | — |
| Doody Alton F III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | -16,110 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | -832 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | +16,110 | — |
| DePree Alexis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | -16,110 | — |
| Doody Alton F III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | -832 | — |
| Doody Alton F III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| Doody Alton F III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | +16,110 | — |
| DePree Alexis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | -832 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | -16,110 | — |
| Beargie William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| ADAMS ALBERT T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| Burgdoerfer Stuart B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 16,110 | +16,110 | — |
| DePree Alexis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| Burgdoerfer Stuart B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| ADAMS ALBERT T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 832 | -832 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,384,302 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,652,817 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology