Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$4.90
▼ $0.40 (-7.5%)
Market data updated: 09/17 11:00 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$4.74 - $5.41
52-Week Range
$2.05 - $9.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
ANGX is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-44.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 233.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -50.5% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $5.22
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 21 to 48 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $5.22
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 71)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $5.22
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 20 to 66 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
92
Risk
26
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
26
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Angel Studios, Inc. (ANGX) has primarily focused on its **strong Q2 2026 financial performance**, particularly the **99% surge in guild memberships** to 2.61 million, alongside **beating earnings per share (EPS) expectations** despite flat revenue growth. While shares briefly dipped post-earnings, the company’s **audience-driven media and technology model** drew investor attention, with **insider stock purchases** and **conference participation announcements** highlighting continued market interest.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Angel Studios, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
26
Technical
92
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+53%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+44
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a dominant herd mentality, likely fueled by peer momentum and recent gains (+2.0% vs. +1.3%). Euphoria lingers due to extreme news sentiment (100/100) and overvaluation (+38% above 200-day avg), despite weak momentum. The narrative-reality gap (21 points) hints at detached optimism. The key question: will traders sustain herd alignment or pivot if momentum stalls? FOMO remains muted by subdued volume and negative ROC.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:22 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Guild memberships surge 99% to 2.61M"
"EPS beat at -$0.13, but shares fall 4.3% after hours"
"Angel announces upcoming investor conference participation"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 78/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ANGX reflects deep philosophical and methodological differences among the investors. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s moderate score suggests it could be a *reasonable* but not definitive long-term hold, while the efficient-market camp sees little justification for picking it over a passive index—both implying a cautious, pragmatic stance. In contrast, the more fundamentalists like Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher dismiss it outright, with Fisher’s low score signaling a lack of the sustained growth and quality he demanded, and Graham’s Enterprising Investor model failing to find enough valuation justification entirely. Meanwhile, the risk-averse voices—from Loeb’s capital-preservation focus to Marks’ cycle analysis—flag it as a speculative or late-stage play, while the behavioral economists (Mackay, Veblen) warn of crowd-driven hype or overvaluation. The discipline of Schwager’s trading wizards and Livermore’s trend-following rule further reinforce the consensus that this stock lacks clear momentum or structural strength.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 78
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 48
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 32
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 18
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 10
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 5
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 256 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
61.2%
Operating Margin
-50.5%
Net Margin
-53.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-1040.3%
ROA
-70.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.10
Cash
$44.08M
Total Debt
$45.50M
Current Ratio
0.62
Debt/Equity
1.35
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$0.05
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
MarketBeat · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
ChartMill · 4.8.2026
Business Wire · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 16.7.2026
Insider Monkey · 15.7.2026
Business Wire · 14.7.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.7.2026
Business Wire · 2.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.6.2026
Angel Studios, Inc. (ANGX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ANGX currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ANGX's technical score is 92/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 233.2%; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -50.5% (negative); Net margin: -53.0% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ANGX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 11 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarowitz Steven I | Open Market Purchase | 1.9.2026 | 10,979 | +10,979 | $4.27 |
| Harmon Neal | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 29,193.1 | +29,193.1 | $4.28 |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 57,922 | +57,922 | $4.26 |
| Harmon Jeffrey | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 51,380 | +51,380 | $4.26 |
| Harmon Neal | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 55,531 | +29,036 | $4.31 |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 683,303 | +107,662 | $4.12 |
| Harmon Neal | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 29,035.659 | +29,035.659 | $4.31 |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 107,662 | +107,662 | $4.12 |
| Harmon Jeffrey | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 178,700 | +178,700 | $4.08 |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 575,641 | +246,153 | $3.71 |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 246,153 | +246,153 | $3.71 |
| Ellis Elizabeth | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.7.2026 | 129,812 | -129,812 | — |
| Ellis Elizabeth | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.7.2026 | 129,812 | +129,812 | $0.16 |
| Ellis Elizabeth | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.7.2026 | 283,573 | +129,812 | $0.16 |
| Ellis Elizabeth | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -129,812 | — |
| Crane Benton Deloss | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | -2,648 | — |
| Liljenquist Katie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | -2,648 | — |
| GAY ROBERT C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | +2,648 | — |
| Crane Benton Deloss | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | +2,648 | — |
| Liljenquist Katie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | +2,648 | — |
| GAY ROBERT C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | -2,648 | — |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | +2,648 | — |
| Sarowitz Steven I | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,648 | -2,648 | — |
| GAY ROBERT C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 7,944 | +2,648 | — |
| GAY ROBERT C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,649 | -2,648 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,943,448 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,929,610 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology