Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$13.75
▲ $0.12 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 06:35 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$13.37 - $13.86
52-Week Range
$3.71 - $14.19
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$8.67
Resistance
$14.19
AMWL is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+110.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 57.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$56.39 vs. price $13.75 (-510.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $13.67
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 71)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $13.67
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 39 to 64 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
12d ago · $12.99
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
88
Risk
40
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Amwell (American Well Corporation)** highlights its strategic growth and industry recognition. The company has secured a **Letter of Intent from the Department of Veterans Affairs** to modernize its digital health infrastructure, reinforcing its role in expanding virtual care access. Analysts have raised **fair value estimates and price targets**, citing improved revenue visibility, cost discipline, and partnerships like the **Defense Health Agency**. Amwell also earned **Frost & Sullivan’s 2026 Technology Innovation Leadership Award** for addressing healthcare fragmentation through its unified platform. Upcoming investor conferences and a **stock upgrade to "Buy"** further signal investor confidence in its future prospects.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Well Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
30
Technical
88
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+62%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+32
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s euphoric state for AMWL is evident through extreme positive sentiment, strong momentum, and a massive overvaluation gap relative to its 200-day average. Confirmation bias is also active, as investors appear to prioritize narrative-driven optimism over stagnant revenue and modest margin gains. The dominant question is whether this disconnect between price action and fundamentals will persist or if a correction will emerge to realign expectations. The absence of panic selling or loss aversion suggests confidence remains high, but the narrative gap could eventually become unsustainable. Herding behavior is selective, favoring AMWL over peers, which may amplify momentum further.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:10 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"analysts lifted fair value estimates from US$8.9 to US$12.8"
"Frost & Sullivan's 2026 Technology Innovation Leadership Recognition"
"Department of Veterans Affairs to help power its digital health infrastructure"
"American Well (AMWL) has been upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy)"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AMWL reflects deep methodological differences in risk tolerance, valuation thresholds, and market timing instincts. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising models both rate it highly—Graham’s strict criteria for liquidity and margin of safety align with Bagehot’s credit resilience, while his enterprising approach still sees a statistical discount. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s mixed score suggests the stock’s growth is already priced in, a nuance lost on trend-averse traders like Livermore or Schwager, who dismiss it entirely for lacking clear momentum or technical setups. On the other end, Fisher’s quality-focused lens and Marks’ risk-averse stance reject it outright, while Smith’s long-term stability mandate and Malkiel/Bogle’s efficient-market skepticism treat it as a suboptimal bet. Even Veblen’s cautious growth skepticism contrasts with the bullishness of Graham’s frameworks, illustrating how valuation, cyclicality, and behavioral biases shape wildly different conclusions.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 84
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 66
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 32
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 23
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 21
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-42.2%
Net Margin
-38.4%
EBITDA Margin
-28.6%
ROE
-40.6%
ROA
-29.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$5.96
Cash
$182.33M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
3.37
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.75
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$56.39
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-510.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-3.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.4% | $-63.70M | $-58.44M |
| 2 | -2.0% | $-62.45M | $-52.57M |
| 3 | -0.5% | $-62.16M | $-48.00M |
| 4 | 1.0% | $-62.79M | $-44.48M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-64.36M | $-41.83M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-65.97M
Terminal Value
$-1.01B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-659.61M
Enterprise Value
$-904.92M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-904.92M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$14.68
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 2.9.2026
Fintel · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
American Well Corporation (AMWL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMWL currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMWL's estimated fair value is -$56.39, which is 510.1% below the current price of $13.75. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMWL's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 57.1%; Free cash flow growth: 48.2%; Net income growth: 54.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$56.39 vs. price $13.75 (-510.1%); Operating margin: -42.2% (negative); Net margin: -38.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AMWL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McNeice Paul Francis | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 112 | -112 | $11.80 |
| HIRSCHHORN MARK | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 10,751 | -10,751 | $11.80 |
| Gotlib Phyllis | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 3,573 | -3,573 | $11.80 |
| McNeice Paul Francis | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 653 | -653 | $9.33 |
| Zamansky Dmitry | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 8,460 | -8,460 | $9.33 |
| HIRSCHHORN MARK | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 4,299 | -4,299 | $9.33 |
| Gotlib Phyllis | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 6,677 | -6,677 | $9.33 |
| HIRSCHHORN MARK | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 238,939 | -4,299 | $9.33 |
| Gotlib Phyllis | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 152,754 | -6,677 | $9.33 |
| Zamansky Dmitry | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 232,620 | -8,460 | $9.33 |
| McNeice Paul Francis | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 9,851 | -653 | $9.33 |
| Jackson Deborah C | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 14,501 | +14,501 | — |
| Schlegel Stephen J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 14,501 | +14,501 | — |
| Goldwasser Rivka | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 14,501 | +14,501 | — |
| Webb Robert Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 14,501 | +14,501 | — |
| Ross Derek | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 14,501 | +14,501 | — |
| Cosgrove Delos M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 14,501 | +14,501 | — |
| Jackson Deborah C | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 53,633 | +14,501 | — |
| Schlegel Stephen J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 69,054 | +14,501 | — |
| Goldwasser Rivka | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 105,861 | +14,501 | — |
| Ross Derek | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 71,183 | +14,501 | — |
| Webb Robert Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 72,559 | +14,501 | — |
| Cosgrove Delos M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 71,193 | +14,501 | — |
| Schlegel Stephen J. | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 9,750 | -9,750 | $8.76 |
| Schlegel Stephen J. | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 54,553 | -9,750 | $8.76 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
132,228 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 162,483 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 35.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology