Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$19.60
▼ $0.59 (-2.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:28 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$4.79B
Day Range
$19.50 - $20.33
52-Week Range
$19.21 - $38.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$19.21
Resistance
$25.08
AMTM is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-12.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $39.59 vs. price $19.60 (+102.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.37 (3y annualized return -18.7% / max drawdown 50.8%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
57
Momentum
34
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
38
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Amentum Holdings, Inc.** has primarily focused on its **stock performance decline**, with a **35.7% drop over six months** and softer quarterly results raising investor concerns. However, the company has also gained attention for securing **high-profile contracts**, including a **£100 million+ deal** to provide **cybersecurity and digital engineering services** for upgrading and protecting the **UK’s power grid** under SSEN Transmission frameworks, highlighting its growth in critical infrastructure and energy sector projects.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Amentum Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
60
Fundamentals
38
Technical
34
Valuation
57
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (74) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.3% proximity to support, a common reaction when price nears a psychological barrier. Loss aversion (57) further suggests hesitation to cut losses, despite muted FOMO or panic signals. The narrative gap (3) hints at a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but the key question remains: will traders hold near support or break below it? The low volume (0.60x) and neutral RSI (38) imply caution, not urgency, in decision-making.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Amentum’s stock price has taken a beating over the past six months, shedding 35.7% of its value and falling to $20.04 per share. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results."
"Amentum has been selected for strategic positions on two significant UK energy frameworks awarded by SSEN Transmission."
"Amentum Holdings (AMTM) Wins NASA Contract Following A Fair Value Debate"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 28/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with some models seeing it as a high-potential opportunity while others flag it as risky or overvalued. Peter Lynch and Samuel Armstrong Nelson both rate it near-perfectly (90), viewing it as either a growth stock undervalued by the market or a cyclical pick near oversold territory—suggesting a bullish, momentum-driven perspective. Meanwhile, Fisher and Mackay lean positive but more cautiously, emphasizing quality and the absence of crowd-driven hype, while Marks and Schwager temper enthusiasm, warning of high expectations or uneven risk-reward dynamics. On the other end, Graham, Livermore, and Loeb dismiss it outright—Graham finds it statistically uncheap, Livermore sees it as counter-trend, and Loeb flags excessive risk, reflecting a defensive or contrarian stance. The divide underscores a tension between growth-oriented, cyclical, and value-driven approaches, with some models prioritizing upside potential and others focusing on safety or trend alignment.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 90
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 53
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 46
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 37
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 28
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
10.8%
Operating Margin
3.3%
Net Margin
0.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
1.5%
ROA
0.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.27
Cash
$437.00M
Total Debt
$3.94B
Current Ratio
1.32
Debt/Equity
0.88
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$19.60
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$39.59
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+102.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $645.00M | $591.74M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $769.97M | $648.07M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $875.84M | $676.31M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $947.00M | $670.88M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $970.68M | $630.87M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$516.00M
Terminal Value
$15.31B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$9.95B
Enterprise Value
$13.17B
Net Debt
$3.51B
Equity Value
$9.66B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$18.50
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.47
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 20.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMTM currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMTM's estimated fair value is $39.59, which is 102.0% above the current price of $19.60. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMTM's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $39.59 vs. price $19.60 (+102.0%); Revenue growth (last year): 71.6%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 130.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.37 (3y annualized return -18.7% / max drawdown 50.8%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AMTM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heller John E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 18,145 | -18,145 | — |
| Arnette Stephen A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 3,314 | -3,314 | $24.89 |
| Arnette Stephen A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 13,609 | -13,609 | — |
| Johnson Travis Barton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 13,609 | +13,609 | — |
| Bruning Jill L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Bruning Jill L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 2,731 | -2,731 | $24.89 |
| Arnette Stephen A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 13,609 | +13,609 | — |
| Heller John E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 18,145 | +18,145 | — |
| Heller John E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 8,184 | -8,184 | $24.89 |
| Johnson Travis Barton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 13,609 | -13,609 | — |
| Mullen Sean Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Johnson Travis Barton | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 4,097 | -4,097 | $24.89 |
| Mullen Sean Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 2,762 | -2,762 | $24.89 |
| Mullen Sean Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,072 | -9,072 | — |
| Bruning Jill L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,072 | -9,072 | — |
| Heller John E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 384,203 | +18,145 | — |
| Heller John E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 376,019 | -8,184 | $24.89 |
| Heller John E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 18,146 | -18,145 | — |
| Mullen Sean Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 35,210 | +9,072 | — |
| Mullen Sean Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 32,448 | -2,762 | $24.89 |
| Mullen Sean Thomas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,073 | -9,072 | — |
| Johnson Travis Barton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 122,284 | +13,609 | — |
| Johnson Travis Barton | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 118,187 | -4,097 | $24.89 |
| Johnson Travis Barton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 13,609 | -13,609 | — |
| Arnette Stephen A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 109,966 | +13,609 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,095,846 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,385,682 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology