Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$352.18
▲ $9.36 (+2.7%)
Market data updated: 09/18 09:00 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$9.11B
Day Range
$346.66 - $356.02
52-Week Range
$230.10 - $392.92
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
+46.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 50.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
63
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) has primarily focused on its strong financial performance and investor-friendly actions. The company has repurchased approximately $375 million in stock over six months, drawing attention as a high-performing asset manager. Analysts compare its stock performance against peers like Allstate and BlackRock, highlighting AMG’s outperformance and potential value for investors. Long-term growth and portfolio strength are also noted, with a $100 investment five years ago yielding significant returns.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
20
Fundamentals
63
Technical
23
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (65 vs. 38) fuels euphoria and herding, as AMG’s outperformance relative to peers and extreme sentiment align with overconfidence. The lack of panic or loss aversion indicates complacency despite modest volatility. The key question: *Is the premium to DCF (+7%) justified by fundamentals, or is herding amplifying overvaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Affiliated Managers Group Repurchased About $375 Million of Stock in 6 Months"
"AMG has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 5.73% on an annualized basis"
"Should Value Investors Buy Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) Stock?"
"With this secondary listing, we will significantly expand AMG’s investor base in Europe"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between growth-oriented and risk-averse methodologies. Thorstein Veblen and Peter Lynch, both drawn to real value creation and underpriced growth, see strong potential, with scores above 70 highlighting their alignment with the stock’s perceived upside. Meanwhile, cyclical and market-timing approaches like Samuel Nelson and Howard Marks (cycle) caution that the stock may be nearing a peak or overvalued, with scores in the mid-30s to 50s signaling caution. The contrast is even sharper when comparing Graham’s defensive framework—rejecting it outright—with Fisher’s quality-driven lens, both scoring poorly (35) because the stock lacks the stability or growth signature they demand. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Livermore and Schwager’s disciplined wizards dismiss it entirely, while efficient-market theorists and Bogle/Malkiel see no clear edge over passive indexing. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s volatility and speculative traits (noted by Marks and Housel) are worth the risk for patient, long-term holders or if it’s better suited for those who prioritize defensive, statistically cheap, or trend-aligned plays.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 81
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 51
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 36
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 19
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$328.11
Range Bottom
$392.92
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
34.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
22.1%
ROA
7.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$25.18
Cash
$586.00M
Total Debt
$2.69B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.83
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $0.010 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.010 |
| 10.5.2026 | $0.010 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.010 |
| 22.2.2026 | $0.010 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.010 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.010 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.010 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.010 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.010 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.010 |
| 18.2.2025 | $0.010 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$352.18
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$336.53
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-4.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.6% | $932.13M | $855.17M |
| 2 | -2.1% | $912.68M | $768.19M |
| 3 | -0.6% | $907.59M | $700.83M |
| 4 | 1.0% | $916.40M | $649.20M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $939.31M | $610.49M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$967.10M
Terminal Value
$14.81B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$9.63B
Enterprise Value
$13.21B
Net Debt
$2.11B
Equity Value
$11.11B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$98.13
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$28.25
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 11 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Motley Fool · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMG currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMG's estimated fair value is $336.53, which is 4.4% below the current price of $352.18. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMG's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 50.3%; Net income growth: 40.1%; Return on equity (ROE): 22.1% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -7.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — AMG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STARR LOREN M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 716 | +716 | — |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 848 | +848 | — |
| Matos Rodriguez Felix V. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 654 | -654 | — |
| FRANQUI ANNETTE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 477 | -477 | — |
| FRANQUI ANNETTE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 477 | +477 | — |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 848 | -848 | — |
| Matos Rodriguez Felix V. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 654 | +654 | — |
| STARR LOREN M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 716 | -716 | — |
| FRANQUI ANNETTE | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| Matos Rodriguez Felix V. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| STARR LOREN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 411 | +411 | — |
| Engel Marcy | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| Cates G. Staley | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| STARR LOREN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 210 | +210 | — |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| Cates G. Staley | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| Engel Marcy | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| Matos Rodriguez Felix V. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| FRANQUI ANNETTE | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 274 | +274 | — |
| STARR LOREN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 411 | +411 | — |
| STARR LOREN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 210 | +210 | — |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 685 | -685 | $354.62 |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 2,958 | +2,958 | $82.07 |
| Palandjian Tracy P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 2,958 | -2,958 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
868,607 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 781,318 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology