Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$6.26
▲ $0.03 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 05:41 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$466.95M
Day Range
$6.19 - $6.31
52-Week Range
$5.13 - $7.60
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
-16.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.29 (3y annualized return -17.7% / max drawdown 60.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
9
Risk
36
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
48
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of AH Realty Trust, Inc. has primarily centered on its **second-quarter 2026 earnings report**, released on August 3, highlighting key financial metrics like FFO (Funds From Operations) performance. The company emphasized **strategic deleveraging** and office sector recovery trends, aligning with broader industry optimism about the **resurgence of office real estate**. Analysts also noted investor speculation and comparisons to peers like Piedmont Realty Trust. The focus remained on financial results and market positioning amid shifting commercial real estate dynamics.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AH Realty Trust, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 6 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
74
Fundamentals
48
Technical
9
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AHRT’s psychology is fragmented, with no dominant state but anchoring (33) and herd behavior (30) as notable signals. The narrative-reality gap (12) suggests traders may overestimate positive momentum despite weak technicals. Herding implies relative outperformance attracts followers, while anchoring hints at support-level scrutiny. The key question: will traders hold near support or exit if momentum fails to reverse? Low volatility (0.91x ATR) reduces panic risk but also dampens euphoria potential.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 07:28 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Office REITs, particularly AH Realty Trust and Piedmont Realty Trust, are poised for recovery"
"Q2 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Deleveraging"
"AH REALTY TRUST (AHRT) Q2 FFO Top Estimates"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The scores for AHRT span a wide range, from Charles Mackay’s 82 down to Peter Lynch’s 21, indicating mixed signals across the methodologies. Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that investors who focus on crowd sentiment, valuation gaps, and disciplined reward‑to‑risk setups—such as Mackay, Graham’s Enterprising framework, and Schwager—see relatively favorable conditions, noting an absence of mania and a disciplined setup. In contrast, those who prioritize long‑term quality, growth sustainability, liquidity and macro‑cycle positioning—like Fisher, Lynch, Loeb, Veblen, Marks, and Bagehot—receive lower scores, flagging insufficient growth signatures, high expectations, liquidity risk, and volatility. This divergence arises because each methodology weighs different factors, with some emphasizing short‑term technical and valuation cues while others stress intrinsic business quality and broader market cycles.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 81
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 80
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 44
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 21
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
28.4%
Net Margin
2.0%
EBITDA Margin
28.4%
ROE
0.9%
ROA
0.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.07
Cash
$49.15M
Total Debt
$1.53B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
2.43
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.6.2026 | $0.140 |
| 26.3.2026 | $0.140 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.140 |
| 24.9.2025 | $0.140 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.140 |
| 26.3.2025 | $0.140 |
| 26.12.2024 | $0.205 |
| 25.9.2024 | $0.205 |
| 26.6.2024 | $0.205 |
| 26.3.2024 | $0.205 |
| 26.12.2023 | $0.195 |
| 26.9.2023 | $0.195 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$7.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 13 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
MarketBeat · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 3.8.2026
Associated Press · 3.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.8.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.7.2026
Zacks · 21.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.6.2026
AH Realty Trust, Inc. (AHRT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AHRT currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AHRT's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Operating margin: 28.4% — strong; NAV per share: $7.84.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.29 (3y annualized return -17.7% / max drawdown 60.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -120.6%; Net income growth: -84.3%.
Yes — AHRT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Open Market Purchase | 2.7.2026 | 45,218 | +529 | $7.01 |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Open Market Purchase | 2.7.2026 | 529.33 | +529.33 | $7.01 |
| Cherry James C. | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 19,633 | -4,981 | — |
| Cherry James C. | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 9,626 | +4,981 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 44,688 | +358 | $7.00 |
| Hoffler Daniel A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 19,633 | -4,981 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 19,633 | -4,981 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | +4,981 | — |
| Carroll James A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 9,626 | +4,981 | — |
| Hoffler Daniel A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,993,244 | +4,981 | — |
| Carroll James A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 19,633 | -4,981 | — |
| Hoffler Daniel A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | -4,981 | — |
| Carroll James A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | +4,981 | — |
| Cherry James C. | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | -4,981 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | +4,981 | — |
| Carroll James A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | -4,981 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | -4,981 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 357.85 | +357.85 | $7.00 |
| Hoffler Daniel A | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | +4,981 | — |
| Cherry James C. | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 1.7.2026 | 4,981 | +4,981 | — |
| Cherry James C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 24,614 | +11,695 | — |
| Wimbush Frederick Blair | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 24,614 | +11,695 | — |
| Carroll James A | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 24,614 | +11,695 | — |
| BIGMAN THEODORE | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 11,695 | +11,695 | — |
| Hoffler Daniel A | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 24,614 | +11,695 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,071,037 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,438,277 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology