Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$33.61
▲ $0.66 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/18 06:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$2.01B
Day Range
$33.19 - $34.30
52-Week Range
$22.24 - $46.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
AGIO is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
-7.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 48.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$166.06 vs. price $33.61 (-594.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
41
Risk
40
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
35
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Agios Pharmaceuticals has centered on its financial performance and market outlook, particularly around its drug **mitapivat**. The company reported **strong Q2 earnings**, beating revenue estimates while expanding its commercial franchise by leveraging mitapivat for **PK deficiency, thalassemia, and sickle cell disease**. Analysts maintained **optimistic "Buy" ratings** with raised price targets ($34 to $55), though some adjusted downward slightly, reflecting confidence in its rare disease strategy and revenue growth.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
56
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
35
Technical
41
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
56
Narrative Gap
+0
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AGIO’s psychology is dominated by **euphoria**, despite weak momentum and neutral technicals, likely fueled by strong positive sentiment (92/100) and a slight premium above its 200-day average. The narrative-reality gap (4 points) suggests traders may be overestimating fundamentals relative to price action. Overconfidence is minimal, but the divergence from peers (herding score = 0) hints at selective optimism. The key question: *Is the premium above the 200-day average sustainable, or will sentiment cool if momentum fails to recover?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:44 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Strong Mitapivat Revenue"
"maintains Agios Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:AGIO) with a Buy"
"raises the price target from $46 to $52"
"AGIO Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Revenues Increase Year Over Year"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 20/100
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 82
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 58
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 58
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 51
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 48
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 20
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
88.3%
Operating Margin
-873.9%
Net Margin
-764.0%
EBITDA Margin
-873.9%
ROE
-34.6%
ROA
-31.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$7.12
Cash
$89.13M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
11.46
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$33.61
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$166.06
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-594.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-471.62M | $-432.68M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-562.99M | $-473.86M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-640.40M | $-494.51M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-692.44M | $-490.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-709.75M | $-461.29M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-377.29M
Terminal Value
$-11.19B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-7.27B
Enterprise Value
$-9.63B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-9.63B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$20.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$20.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
MarketBeat · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
Zacks · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Associated Press · 30.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 30.7.2026
ChartMill · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 30.7.2026
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGIO currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AGIO's estimated fair value is -$166.06, which is 594.1% below the current price of $33.61. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AGIO's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 48.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 11.46.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$166.06 vs. price $33.61 (-594.1%); Operating margin: -873.9% (negative); Net margin: -764.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AGIO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gheuens Sarah | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $30.48 |
| Gheuens Sarah | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 54,645 | -30,000 | $30.48 |
| Backstrom Jay T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.7.2026 | 1,447 | +1,447 | — |
| Backstrom Jay T. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 1,447 | -1,447 | — |
| Backstrom Jay T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.7.2026 | 1,447 | +1,447 | — |
| Backstrom Jay T. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.7.2026 | 2,894 | -1,447 | — |
| Gheuens Sarah | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 4,007 | -4,007 | $37.56 |
| Gheuens Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 8,375 | -8,375 | — |
| Gheuens Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 8,375 | +8,375 | — |
| Gheuens Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 88,652 | +8,375 | — |
| Gheuens Sarah | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 84,645 | -4,007 | $37.56 |
| Gheuens Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 0 | -8,375 | — |
| Smith Cynthia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 2,816 | +2,816 | — |
| Burns James William | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | — |
| Burns James William | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Gheuens Sarah | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Scadden David | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 14,950 | +14,950 | — |
| Goff Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 39,000 | +39,000 | — |
| Scadden David | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 2,927 | +2,927 | — |
| Viswanadhan Krishnan | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | — |
| Viswanadhan Krishnan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Smith Cynthia | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 14,950 | +14,950 | — |
| Gheuens Sarah | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | — |
| Goff Brian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 39,000 | -39,000 | — |
| Smith Cynthia | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 2,927 | +2,927 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,535,054 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,840,722 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology