Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$16.80
▲ $0.51 (+3.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:15 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.39B
Day Range
$16.16 - $16.82
52-Week Range
$15.60 - $19.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$15.60
Resistance
$16.82
-12.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.08 (3y annualized return -2.1% / max drawdown 27.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $16.80
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 21 to 47 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
60
Momentum
81
Risk
56
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage for American Financial Group, Inc. is limited, as the provided sources do not mention the company directly. The single relevant snippet from SeekingAlpha (August 2026) only references dividend announcements without specifying American Financial Group or its 4.500% Subordinated Debentures due 2060. No substantive or recurring themes about the company or its debt instruments appear in the given sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Financial Group, Inc. 4.500% Subordinated Debentures due 2060. News trend score: 56. Reason: 1 of the last 3 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
97
Fundamentals
62
Technical
81
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+13
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior reflects traders’ fixation on AFGE’s near-term support (1.3% away), likely due to recent price stability. Herding is present but muted, as AFGE lags peers slightly (-0.6% vs. -0.4%), indicating cautious following rather than aggressive alignment. FOMO and panic are minimal, given neutral momentum (-2.0% ROC) and balanced sentiment (50/100). The key question is whether this support holds or if traders will break free from the anchor under further pressure. The narrative-reality gap (0) suggests no misalignment in expectations, but the anchoring bias may delay decisive action until a clear catalyst emerges.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:09 AM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with the highest-scoring approaches—like Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology analysis and Benjamin Graham’s value investing frameworks—both endorsing it as a low-risk, statistically undervalued opportunity. Mackay’s near-perfect score suggests no speculative frenzy, while Graham’s Enterprising Investor and Defensive Investor verdicts highlight deep discounts and defensive resilience, reinforcing a conservative yet opportunistic stance. Meanwhile, mid-tier thinkers like Howard Marks and Samuel Nelson see it as a balanced risk-reward play, with Marks noting reasonable pricing and Nelson identifying a favorable cycle position. However, the divergence sharpens when comparing these to more skeptical voices: Fisher, Lynch, and Livermore dismiss it outright, with Fisher and Lynch citing lackluster growth potential and Livermore’s trend-following rules flagging a negative momentum signal. Even efficient-market theorists and Schwager’s neutral stance imply the stock’s case is weak relative to broader market benchmarks, while Veblen’s mixed verdict hints at potential profit ambiguity. The contrast underscores how value-driven and defensive strategies align on AFGE’s fundamentals, while growth-oriented or trend-following methodologies reject it entirely.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 98
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 85
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 72
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 71
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 51
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 0
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 264 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$15.60
Range Bottom
$16.82
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
13.1%
Net Margin
10.3%
EBITDA Margin
14.2%
ROE
17.5%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.08
Cash
$1.73B
Total Debt
$1.82B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.38
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.281 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.281 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.281 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.281 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.281 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.281 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.281 |
| 29.11.2024 | $0.281 |
| 30.8.2024 | $0.281 |
| 31.5.2024 | $0.281 |
| 29.2.2024 | $0.281 |
| 30.11.2023 | $0.281 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$57.72
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$51.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 3 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
American Financial Group, Inc. 4.500% Subordinated Debentures due 2060 (AFGE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AFGE currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AFGE's technical score is 81/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.4% of price; Debt/equity: 0.38.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.08 (3y annualized return -2.1% / max drawdown 27.9%); Revenue growth (last year): -1.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -4.6%.
Yes — AFGE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 18 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hertzman Brian S. | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 950 | -950 | $142.87 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 81,373 | -81,373 | $144.28 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 8,627 | -8,627 | $144.66 |
| Weiss Mark A | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,813 | -2,813 | $144.76 |
| Gillis Michelle A | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 2,247 | -2,247 | $139.00 |
| Thompson David Lawrence Jr | Open Market Sale | 23.6.2026 | 11,370 | -11,370 | $135.05 |
| JOSEPH GREGORY G | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| VERITY WILLIAM W | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Murray Amy Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| VON LEHMAN JOHN I | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Martin Mary Beth | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Nwankwo Evans N | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Newport Roger K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Hertzman Brian S. | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 1,663 | -1,663 | $133.70 |
| Thompson David Lawrence Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 4,706 | +4,706 | — |
| Hertzman Brian S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 3,163 | +3,163 | — |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 11,294 | +11,294 | — |
| Gillis Michelle A | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 3,012 | +3,012 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
644 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,674 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 26.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology