Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$32.19
▼ $1.26 (-3.8%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:19 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$412.75M
Day Range
$32.19 - $33.79
52-Week Range
$12.23 - $48.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
ADV is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-30.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: 30.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$1.94 vs. price $32.19 (-106.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
47
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
26
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Advantage Solutions Inc. has primarily centered on its **Q2 2026 earnings performance**, where the company reported **revenue growth** while still operating at a loss, though it surpassed analyst estimates. Key themes include **strong event-driven growth (18% year-over-year)** and efforts to **improve cash flow and deleveraging**, alongside **analyst reactions**—such as Morgan Stanley’s **lowered price target to $34**—and **rising implied volatility** in its stock options. The focus remains on financial stability amid profitability challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Advantage Solutions Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
30
Fundamentals
26
Technical
47
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-8%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ADV is dominated by **loss aversion**, as evidenced by the prolonged 3-month drawdown (-19.9%) and muted trading activity (0.67x average volume). This suggests investors are hesitant to accelerate selling, possibly waiting for clearer signals or hoping for a rebound. Confirmation bias (score: 17) hints at selective focus on narrative positives despite stagnant fundamentals, while herding (score: 63) indicates underperformance aligns with peers, reducing urgency. The key open question is whether the subdued volume reflects genuine caution or merely a pause before further downward pressure. The absence of panic selling (score: 22) or euphoria (score: 19) underscores a cautious, risk-averse stance.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:50 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reports second-quarter revenue growth while profitability remains under pressure"
"lowers the price target from $35 to $34"
"targets deleveraging with cash flow"
"Experiential Growth Offsets"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 67/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and bearish views on ADV, reflecting starkly different priorities. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score (92) and favorable cycle position suggest he’d see this stock as undervalued relative to its long-term trend, while Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Charles Mackay also lean cautiously optimistic, flagging early-cycle strength and no crowd-driven mania. Conversely, the majority—including Graham’s strict defensive criteria, Livermore’s trend-following rule, and Housel’s volatility aversion—reject the stock outright, scoring it poorly due to perceived risk, lack of growth, or instability. Even mixed signals from Marks (general) and the efficient-market camp highlight a disconnect: some see potential in the business, while others dismiss it as overpriced or too volatile for patient investors. The divide underscores whether the focus should be on cyclical positioning, fundamental safety, or market efficiency.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 67
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 55
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 29
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 28
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 13
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 11
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-3.6%
Net Margin
-6.4%
EBITDA Margin
2.1%
ROE
-41.1%
ROA
-8.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$240.85M
Total Debt
$1.67B
Current Ratio
2.25
Debt/Equity
3.02
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$32.19
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$1.94
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-106.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.8% | $54.64M | $50.13M |
| 2 | 0.1% | $54.67M | $46.02M |
| 3 | 0.9% | $55.15M | $42.59M |
| 4 | 1.7% | $56.08M | $39.73M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $57.48M | $37.36M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$55.05M
Terminal Value
$906.44M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$589.12M
Enterprise Value
$804.94M
Net Debt
$1.43B
Equity Value
$-628.07M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.71
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$2.71
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 17 articles.
Zacks · 25.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 5.8.2026
Moby · 5.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
ChartMill · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.7.2026
Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ADV currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ADV's estimated fair value is -$1.94, which is 106.0% below the current price of $32.19. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ADV's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: 30.3%; Current ratio: 2.25; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$1.94 vs. price $32.19 (-106.0%); Operating margin: -3.6% (negative); Net margin: -6.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ADV.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harsh Jeffrey Stephen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.9.2026 | 530 | -530 | $31.92 |
| Growe Christopher | Gift | 23.6.2026 | 7,202 | -7,202 | — |
| Growe Christopher | Gift | 23.6.2026 | 7,202 | +7,202 | — |
| Growe Christopher | Gift | 23.6.2026 | 34,340 | -7,202 | — |
| Growe Christopher | Gift | 23.6.2026 | 16,962 | +7,202 | — |
| Taylor Michael Larry | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 3,403 | -3,403 | $39.20 |
| Growe Christopher | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 2,162 | -2,162 | $39.20 |
| Growe Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 3,971 | +3,971 | — |
| Taylor Michael Larry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 7,092 | -7,092 | — |
| Taylor Michael Larry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 7,092 | +7,092 | — |
| Growe Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 3,971 | -3,971 | — |
| Growe Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 43,704 | +3,971 | — |
| Growe Christopher | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 41,542 | -2,162 | $39.20 |
| Growe Christopher | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 0 | -3,971 | — |
| Taylor Michael Larry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 57,740 | +7,092 | — |
| Taylor Michael Larry | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.6.2026 | 54,337 | -3,403 | $39.20 |
| Taylor Michael Larry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 0 | -7,092 | — |
| Poole Deborah | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| Manherz Robin | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| Ratzan Brian K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| KILTS JAMES M | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| MACEDONIO JODY L | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| WEST DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| Costa Virginie | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,477 | +4,477 | — |
| KILTS JAMES M | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 78,236 | +4,477 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
576,170 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 513,153 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology