Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$10.48
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 06:07 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.78B
Day Range
$10.45 - $10.49
52-Week Range
$4.07 - $10.55
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$6.60
Resistance
$10.50
ACVA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+1.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -8.3% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $10.41
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 79)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $10.41
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 6 to 99 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
79
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
39
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **ACV Auctions Inc.** highlights its strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. The company reported record revenue and EBITDA growth in Q2 2026 despite market softening, while also announcing a strategic integration with **DriveCentric** to enhance dealership sales opportunities. Speculation about potential acquisition interest has risen due to unusual options activity and leadership changes, though no confirmed deals have been announced. Analysts and investors remain focused on its digital automotive marketplace leadership and expansion efforts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ACV Auctions Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
71
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
39
Technical
79
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+62%
Market Narrative
87
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+45
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **herding-driven** dynamic, where ACVA’s outperformance relative to peers (+4.2% vs. +1.3%) may be attracting followers. However, the narrative-reality gap (-7) and muted volatility (0.94x ATR) imply limited emotional extremes. The absence of overconfidence or euphoria signals no overvaluation bias, despite positive news sentiment (74/100). The key question: *Is this herding a temporary momentum play or a shift toward fundamental alignment?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 12:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ACV Auctions (ACVA) Reports Record Revenue and EBITDA Growth As Market Softens"
"announced a strategic integration with DriveCentric... delivering a seamless solution that enables dealerships to acquire more inventory directly from their service drive while creating new revenue opportunities"
"ACV Auctions is attracting takeover rumors amid notable bullish options activity and recent C-suite changes"
"Robust Results and Share Repurchase Authorization Boosted ACV Auctions"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 2/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and cautious views on ACVA, reflecting starkly different priorities. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay’s high scores (84 and 82) suggest a favorable technical or psychological setup—Nelson sees it near oversold, while Mackay detects no crowd-driven mania, implying a contrarian or sentiment-driven opportunity. In contrast, Peter Lynch’s moderate score (70) leans toward growth potential, but even he hedges by noting the price hasn’t fully reflected its upside. Meanwhile, the middle tier—Howard Marks, Edgar Lawrence Smith, and Philip Fisher—cautions that while the stock has merits, it may not justify the premiums Marks expects or Fisher’s exceptional-quality threshold. The lower-scoring camp, from Jesse Livermore’s outright negative trend verdict (37) to Gerald M. Loeb’s risk flag (29), frames the stock as either a contrarian misfit or a speculative gamble, with Livermore’s trend rule and Loeb’s risk aversion overriding any growth or valuation arguments. The divide underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in technical timing (Nelson/Mackay), growth momentum (Lynch), or fundamental safety (Graham/Bogle), or if it’s simply too risky or overpriced for most disciplined frameworks.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 82
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 73
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 68
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 54
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 53
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 36
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 20
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 13
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 2
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
52.4%
Operating Margin
-8.3%
Net Margin
-8.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-15.4%
ROA
-6.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.39
Cash
$271.50M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.60
Debt/Equity
0.44
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$10.48
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$9.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-7.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
21.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.9% | $84.29M | $77.33M |
| 2 | 17.1% | $98.68M | $83.06M |
| 3 | 12.2% | $110.74M | $85.51M |
| 4 | 7.4% | $118.88M | $84.22M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $121.85M | $79.20M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$69.13M
Terminal Value
$1.92B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.25B
Enterprise Value
$1.66B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.66B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.48
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 7 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Fintel · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Motley Fool · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ACVA currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ACVA's estimated fair value is $9.72, which is 7.2% below the current price of $10.48. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ACVA's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.44; Current ratio: 1.60.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -8.3% (negative); Net margin: -8.7% (negative); ATR: 4.3% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ACVA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 100,672 | +100,672 | — |
| Peer Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 194,924 | +100,672 | — |
| ZERELLA WILLIAM | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,481 | -4,481 | $7.29 |
| ZERELLA WILLIAM | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 3,459 | -3,459 | $7.29 |
| Anderson Craig Eric | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 3,645 | -3,645 | $7.29 |
| Waterman Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 8,824 | -8,824 | $7.29 |
| Fitzgerald Leanne | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,158 | -4,158 | $7.29 |
| ZERELLA WILLIAM | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,919 | -4,919 | $7.29 |
| Peer Andrew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 630 | -630 | $7.29 |
| Mehta Vikas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 12,776 | -12,776 | $7.29 |
| Fitzgerald Leanne | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 3,553 | -3,553 | $7.29 |
| Anderson Craig Eric | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,430 | -4,430 | $7.29 |
| Waterman Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 3,459 | -3,459 | $7.29 |
| Mehta Vikas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 6,319 | -6,319 | $7.29 |
| Mehta Vikas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 6,382 | -6,382 | $7.29 |
| Mehta Vikas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,487 | -4,487 | $7.29 |
| Fitzgerald Leanne | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 2,924 | -2,924 | $7.29 |
| Chamoun George | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 21,281 | -21,281 | $7.29 |
| Chamoun George | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 10,582 | -10,582 | $7.29 |
| ZERELLA WILLIAM | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 9,060 | -9,060 | $7.29 |
| Peer Andrew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 1,223 | -1,223 | $7.29 |
| Fitzgerald Leanne | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 7,183 | -7,183 | $7.29 |
| Peer Andrew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 957 | -957 | $7.29 |
| Anderson Craig Eric | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 5,185 | -5,185 | $7.29 |
| Chamoun George | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 9,422 | -9,422 | $7.29 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,638,555 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,748,364 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
30.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology