Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$54.96
▲ $0.48 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:22 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$21.62B
Day Range
$54.12 - $54.98
52-Week Range
$23.02 - $57.87
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$47.00
Resistance
$57.87
YPF is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+123.1% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Parabolic SAR
Price is below the SAR point — downtrend
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
YPF’s overall investor score of 79 reflects a balanced mix of technical strength and mixed external factors. The technical category dominates with a score of 86, driven by sustained price momentum above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and a healthy RSI of 57.6—all signaling robust upward momentum. However, the news category scores 74, weighed down by negative sentiment from high-profile investor actions (e.g., Stanley Druckenmiller’s risky bets) and a downgrade narrative from ARGT, which could introduce uncertainty. The risk category, scoring 50, highlights volatility concerns with a 3.4% ATR and a high Sharpe ratio (1.17), indicating potential for extreme swings, though the 56.8% three-year return suggests resilience. The decline in trading volume despite price gains raises caution about potential weakening interest, though the technical indicators remain supportive.
YPF’s price is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 57.6 indicating strong upward momentum. The %K at 55.5 suggests neutral short-term positioning but aligns with broader bullish trends.
Technical strength signals sustained investor confidence and potential for continued price appreciation, though volume trends may challenge sustainability.
Negative headlines (e.g., Druckenmiller’s bets, ARGT downgrades) outweigh neutral developments like Eni’s Uruguay deals, creating a mixed narrative. The presence of speculative investor activity introduces uncertainty.
Negative sentiment could deter cautious investors, while speculative bets may amplify volatility or attract contrarian interest.
The ATR of 3.4% and a high Sharpe ratio (1.17) reflect volatility and a 56.8% three-year return but also a 48.8% maximum drawdown risk. These metrics highlight both potential rewards and significant downside exposure.
High volatility and drawdown risk suggest YPF may appeal to aggressive traders but could deter risk-averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
YPF exhibits strong technical fundamentals with sustained momentum above key moving averages and positive momentum indicators, supported by a high three-year return. However, mixed news sentiment and elevated volatility introduce risks, particularly for risk-averse investors. The decline in trading volume despite price gains adds caution, suggesting that while the stock may continue its upward trajectory, it could face challenges if broader market conditions or sector trends deteriorate. The balance between technical strength and external uncertainties defines YPF’s current profile.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202665
This Week
78
7D Ago
↓ -13
Weakening
Technical
79
7D Ago: 82
↓ -3
News
38
7D Ago: 80
↓ -42
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $52.41
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $52.46
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 15 to 40 day-over-day
What happened after
18d ago · $51.58
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
24d ago · $50.01
Evidence: תבנית שמתאימה לשלב צבירה מוקדם/אמצעי — טווח מסחר אחרי ירידה עם מחזור מסחר יורד.
What happened after
24d ago · $50.01
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
65 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
83
$50.01
Now
65
$54.96
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
79
Risk
50
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **YPF Sociedad Anónima** has centered on its political and economic risks in Argentina, with Stanley Druckenmiller’s high-profile investments sparking debate over its potential as a contrarian bet. Analysts note macro improvements—like falling inflation and structural reforms—but also highlight regulatory hurdles, such as pending bids for Metrogas and offshore exploration partnerships (e.g., Eni’s Uruguay deals). Technical analyses suggest a bullish breakout setup, while UBS raised its price target to $55, though the stock remains neutral-rated amid mixed market sentiment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about YPF Sociedad Anonima. News trend score: 38. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
19
Fundamentals
—
Technical
79
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-6
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
YPF’s psychology is dominated by **FOMO**, driven by positive momentum (+5.1% ROC), positive sentiment (74/100), and Bollinger %B (0.82), signaling cautious excitement. The narrative gap (60 vs. 50) suggests optimism outpaces fundamentals, but no panic or herd behavior is evident. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will resistance (4.9% away) trigger profit-taking?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Druckenmiller continues to bet on politically sensitive businesses based in Argentina."
"Stanley Druckenmiller Invested Tens of Millions Into These Risky Stocks."
"YPF's shale growth, record refining and stronger cash flow support its outlook, while LNG and capital demands keep execution in focus."
"YPF shows a strong technical breakout setup with 8/10 ratings for both trend and consolidation."
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for YPF reveal a stark divide between momentum-driven and fundamental/cyclical approaches. Jesse Livermore and Charles Mackay both flag strong bullish signals—Livermore sees a clear upward price trend, while Mackay detects crowd-driven excitement, suggesting a speculative rally. In contrast, the majority of fundamentalists—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—struggle with insufficient data to apply their core principles, leaving them neutral. Meanwhile, cyclical and risk-aware investors like Marks, Loeb, and Nelson express caution, with Marks warning of potentially overpriced expectations and Nelson warning of an overbought cycle. The efficient-market camp and Housel lean heavily against active selection, either dismissing the stock’s edge or highlighting its volatility as a red flag for patient investors. The split underscores whether YPF’s appeal lies in technical momentum or whether its fundamentals remain too murky to justify a disciplined buy.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 69
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 20
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Schaeffer's Investment Research · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Motley Fool · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
ChartMill · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 18.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for YPF Sociedad Anonima (YPF) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for YPF specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
YPF's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for YPF.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallino Gustavo Maria | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 35,279 | -35,279 | $7,983.00 |
| Gallino Gustavo Maria | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 100,796 | +100,796 | $7,983.00 |
| Garat Guillermo Jose | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 99,998 | +99,998 | $7,983.00 |
| Fernandez Lahore German Vito | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 121,324 | +121,324 | $7,983.00 |
| Fernandez Lahore German Vito | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 42,464 | -42,464 | $7,983.00 |
| Garat Guillermo Jose | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 34,999 | -34,999 | $7,983.00 |
| Martinez Tanoira Santiago | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 54,458 | -54,458 | $7,983.00 |
| Martinez Tanoira Santiago | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 155,594 | +155,594 | $7,983.00 |
| Mata Juan Jose | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 40,159 | -40,159 | $7,983.00 |
| Mata Juan Jose | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 114,740 | +114,740 | $7,983.00 |
| Pitrelli Guillermo Andres Filiberto | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 28,190 | -28,190 | $7,983.00 |
| Westen Maximiliano Pedro | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 35,001 | -35,001 | $7,983.00 |
| Pitrelli Guillermo Andres Filiberto | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 80,542 | +80,542 | $7,983.00 |
| Wyss Alejandro Luis | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 102,406 | +102,406 | $7,983.00 |
| Tiscornia Florencia | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 109,996 | +109,996 | $7,983.00 |
| Westen Maximiliano Pedro | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 100,002 | +100,002 | $7,983.00 |
| Tiscornia Florencia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 38,499 | -38,499 | $7,983.00 |
| Wyss Alejandro Luis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 35,843 | -35,843 | $7,983.00 |
| Aldeco Marcelo Gustavo | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 32,639 | -32,639 | $7,983.00 |
| Actis Walter Ariel | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 80,492 | +80,492 | $7,983.00 |
| Kearney Pedro Luis | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 95,701 | +95,701 | $7,983.00 |
| Azcurra Maria Martina | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 30,020 | +30,020 | $7,983.00 |
| Actis Walter Ariel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 28,172 | -28,172 | $7,983.00 |
| Kearney Pedro Luis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 33,496 | -33,496 | $7,983.00 |
| Martin Mauricio Alejandro | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 154,914 | +154,914 | $7,983.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,829,325 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,897,708 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology