Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$309.98
▼ $1.01 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:53 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$28.79B
Day Range
$307.03 - $312.92
52-Week Range
$240.61 - $352.79
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$282.81
Resistance
$351.51
WTW is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-6.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1793.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.43 (3y annualized return 13.3% / max drawdown 30.8%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
69
$346.82
Now
56
$309.98
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
29
Risk
42
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
71
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING WTW...
Recent media coverage of Willis Towers Watson (WTW) highlights its strategic growth initiatives and partnerships. The company has seen strong organic growth driven by volume, retention, and market share gains amid softer insurance pricing. WTW also announced Trevor Madden’s appointment as Head of Captive and Insurance Management Solutions for Asia Pacific, while securing a multi-year partnership with WSL Football to support women’s soccer. Financial reports note robust pension fund growth, reinforcing WTW’s resilience in advisory and broking services.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Willis Towers Watson. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
71
Technical
29
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests WTW is caught in a paradox: extreme positive sentiment (98/100) and detached euphoria (+14.1% above 200-day avg) coexist with weak momentum (-4.6% ROC). The dominant herding (score 45) reflects relative underperformance (-2.8% vs. peers) rather than panic or FOMO. Confirmation bias (score 22) persists due to a narrative-reality gap (+17), as traders cling to optimistic narratives despite stagnant revenue. The key open question is whether traders will reassess fundamentals or double down on momentum-driven alignment, given the disconnect between price action and EPS growth.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:39 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"organic growth fueled by volume, retention and share gains"
"approved a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.96 per common share"
"WTW becomes official insurance partner of Barclays WSL and WSL2"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for WTW reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors assess stocks. Peter Lynch, Samuel Nelson, and Thorstein Veblen all see strong growth potential—Lynch highlights undervaluation relative to earnings, Nelson spots a cyclical buying opportunity, and Veblen aligns the stock’s growth with real economic value. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s strict valuation rules and the Enterprising Investor variant reject the stock outright, while Fisher and Bagehot dismiss it for lacking quality or liquidity. The middle-ground methodologies—like Housel’s moderate hold or Livermore’s neutral stance—suggest the stock isn’t a slam dunk but isn’t a clear miss either, whereas Marks’ late-cycle warning and the efficient-market skeptics imply the upside may already be priced in or too speculative.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 77
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 55
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 46
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
23.0%
Net Margin
16.5%
EBITDA Margin
23.0%
ROE
20.1%
ROA
5.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$16.34
Cash
$3.13B
Total Debt
$6.31B
Current Ratio
1.20
Debt/Equity
0.79
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.960 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.960 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.960 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.960 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.920 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.920 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.920 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.920 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.920 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.920 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.920 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.920 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$80.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$21.24
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Moneywise · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Willis Towers Watson (WTW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WTW currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
WTW's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1793.8%; Net income growth: 1737.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.43 (3y annualized return 13.3% / max drawdown 30.8%); Revenue growth (last year): -2.2%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — WTW has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gebauer Julie Jarecke | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 12.628 | +12.628 | — |
| Hess Carl Aaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 53.426 | +53.426 | — |
| Krasner Andrew Jay | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 4.21 | +4.21 | — |
| Faber Alexis | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 730 | -730 | $342.70 |
| Faber Alexis | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 10,752 | -730 | $342.70 |
| Banas Kristy D | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 5.174 | +5.174 | — |
| Banas Kristy D | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 1.867 | +1.867 | — |
| Banas Kristy D | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 4.345 | +4.345 | — |
| Clarke Lucy | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 41.075 | +41.075 | — |
| Faber Alexis | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 8.581 | +8.581 | — |
| Faber Alexis | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 3.584 | +3.584 | — |
| Faber Alexis | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 5.695 | +5.695 | — |
| Furman Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 8.742 | +8.742 | — |
| Gebauer Julie Jarecke | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 11.669 | +11.669 | — |
| Furman Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 12.185 | +12.185 | — |
| Gebauer Julie Jarecke | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 18.831 | +18.831 | — |
| Gebauer Julie Jarecke | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 82.226 | +82.226 | — |
| Furman Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 6.077 | +6.077 | — |
| Hess Carl Aaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 28.353 | +28.353 | — |
| Hess Carl Aaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 35.146 | +35.146 | — |
| Hess Carl Aaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 51.905 | +51.905 | — |
| Kurpis Joseph Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 0.614 | +0.614 | — |
| Kurpis Joseph Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 1.51 | +1.51 | — |
| Kurpis Joseph Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 1.384 | +1.384 | — |
| Pullum Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 3.101 | +3.101 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,430,162 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,536,510 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology