Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$145.19
▲ $0.25 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:28 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$141.37 - $145.73
52-Week Range
$56.36 - $181.63
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$132.77
Resistance
$181.63
+135.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 113.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -18.8% (negative)
Fundamental
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (71/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
52
Risk
48
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
40
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Sphere Entertainment Co. focuses on its strong financial performance and positive analyst sentiment. Guggenheim raised its price target, Piper Sandler initiated
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Sphere Entertainment Co.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
40
Technical
52
Valuation
45
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+34
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SPHR suggests a **psychological vacuum**—no single dominant state emerges, as all scores hover near neutral or low. The narrative gap (51 vs. 38) hints at a disconnect where optimism (92/100 sentiment) fails to translate into actionable momentum or volume. The lack of extreme volatility (0.84x ATR) or RSI divergence (41) further implies a **wait-and-see stance**, where traders may be cautious despite positive headlines. The key question: *Is the muted volume a sign of latent demand or a test of support?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:14 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Guggenheim analyst Curry Baker maintains Sphere Entertainment (NYSE:SPHR) with a Buy and raises the price target from $193 to $208."
"Sands Capital Select Growth Fund targets U.S. businesses driving significant structural change through disruptive innovation."
"Sphere Entertainment Co. announced new and expanded 4D effects for *The Wizard of Oz at Sphere* debuting September 25, 2026."
"Ariel Investments' 13F portfolio included Sphere Entertainment as one of 27 core positions over 2% of assets in Q2 2026."
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 65/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The scores for SPHR span from a high of 86 for Nelson to a low of 9 for Graham’s Enterprising framework, reflecting a broad split in historical perspectives. Cycle‑oriented thinkers such as Nelson (86) and Lynch (65) see a relatively favorable position, citing oversold conditions and lingering growth potential, while value‑focused analysts like Graham (21), Graham‑Enterprising (9) and Fisher (36) flag the stock as failing defensive margins, quality criteria, or statistical cheapness. Mid‑range investors such as Marks (46), Bogle & Malkiel (45), and Schwager (53) land in the mixed‑to‑cautious zone, emphasizing late‑cycle timing, liquidity risk, and lack of a clear edge. Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that these differing methodological lenses naturally produce the observed spread of verdicts, from cautiously optimistic to fundamentally wary.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 65
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 54
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 41
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 20
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 9
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-18.8%
Net Margin
2.7%
EBITDA Margin
8.8%
ROE
1.5%
ROA
0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.93
Cash
$521.26M
Total Debt
$830.45M
Current Ratio
1.09
Debt/Equity
0.37
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$49.30
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$41.21
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Fintel · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SPHR currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SPHR's technical score is 52/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 113.0%; Net income growth: 116.6%; Debt/equity: 0.37.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -18.8% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.5% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SPHR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TESE VINCENT | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| DOLAN CHARLES P | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| WEBER MARIANNE DOLAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| LITVIN JOEL M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| DOLAN PAUL JOSEPH | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| Perelman Debra Golding | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,833 | +1,833 | — |
| SYKES JOHN L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| Sweeney Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| DOLAN THOMAS CHARLES | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| Thomas Isiah III | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| LHOTA JOSEPH | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,173 | +1,173 | — |
| Dolan Kristin A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,723 | +1,723 | — |
| DOLAN PAUL JOSEPH | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 26,935 | +1,173 | — |
| TESE VINCENT | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 20,327 | +1,173 | — |
| WEBER MARIANNE DOLAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 20,327 | +1,173 | — |
| LHOTA JOSEPH | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 28,822 | +1,173 | — |
| DOLAN-SWEENEY DEBORAH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 29,959 | +1,173 | — |
| DOLAN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 24,937 | +1,723 | — |
| DOLAN CHARLES P | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 20,327 | +1,173 | — |
| Perelman Debra Golding | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 6,230 | +1,833 | — |
| SYKES JOHN L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 27,092 | +1,173 | — |
| LITVIN JOEL M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 25,256 | +1,173 | — |
| Thomas Isiah III | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 20,327 | +1,173 | — |
| DOLAN THOMAS CHARLES | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 29,959 | +1,173 | — |
| Lo Allen M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.3.2026 | 15,734 | +15,734 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,331,068 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,494,747 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology