Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$25.10
▲ $0.11 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:21 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$4.72B
Day Range
$24.87 - $25.29
52-Week Range
$17.77 - $31.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$23.00
Resistance
$28.27
-11.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 29.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.46 (3y annualized return 21.1% / max drawdown 45.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
33
Risk
36
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
60
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **SLM Corporation** (listed as Solis Minerals Ltd) has focused on its exploration activities, particularly the company’s **maiden drilling program at the Cinto Copper Project in southern Peru**, targeting a large porphyry copper system. The initiative involves five drill holes over 2,500 meters to assess high-priority copper targets, reflecting its push to capitalize on growing demand for copper and lithium in renewable energy and electrification sectors. No other significant corporate updates were reported in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SLM Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
19
Fundamentals
60
Technical
33
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SLM’s dominant **herding** behavior reflects peer-driven moves, with traders likely following peers’ lead after a coordinated pullback. The **euphoria** score (28) and **FOMO** indicators (momentum, volume, sentiment) suggest residual optimism, though the **anchoring** gap (4.4% below resistance) may constrain upside. The **narrative-reality gap** (16) hints at overestimation of tailwinds. Key tension: whether traders will double down on herding or pivot if momentum stalls.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:08 AM
What could change this?
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that investors focused on growth and cycle positioning—such as Lynch, Nelson and Veblen—assign relatively high scores, reflecting optimism about the stock’s growth potential and favorable market cycle. In contrast, value‑oriented and risk‑averse frameworks like Graham’s Enterprising criteria, Marks’ risk‑valuation lens, and Loeb’s capital‑protection stance produce lower scores, indicating concerns about price, valuation safety margins, and downside risk. The mixed or neutral verdicts from efficiency‑market advocates (Malkiel & Bogle) and the lack of sufficient data for Fisher and Bagehot further illustrate how data availability and methodological emphasis shape each assessment. Consequently, the historical methodologies diverge, with growth‑cycle proponents leaning positive while value, risk, and market‑efficiency perspectives remain cautious or indifferent.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 85
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 58
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 41
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 22
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
34.6%
Net Margin
25.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
30.4%
ROA
2.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.52
Cash
$4.24B
Total Debt
$5.86B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
2.39
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.130 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.130 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.130 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.130 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.130 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.130 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.130 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.130 |
| 4.6.2025 | $0.130 |
| 5.3.2025 | $0.130 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$12.31
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$12.29
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Proactive · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
StockStory · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 26.8.2026
Yahoo Personal Finance · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Yahoo Personal Finance · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Yahoo Personal Finance · 19.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
SLM Corporation (SLM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SLM currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SLM's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 29.1%; Net income growth: 22.4%; Return on equity (ROE): 30.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.46 (3y annualized return 21.1% / max drawdown 45.5%); Debt/equity: 2.39; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — SLM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREIG HENRY F | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,089 | +1,089 | — |
| Manvitz Ted | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,062 | +1,062 | — |
| Blackley Richard Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 1,198 | +1,198 | — |
| Blackley Richard Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 41,619 | +1,198 | — |
| GREIG HENRY F | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 16,929 | +1,089 | — |
| Manvitz Ted | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 76,041 | +1,062 | — |
| Greenstein Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Manvitz Ted | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Lavelle Mark L | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Blackley Richard Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Franke Mary Carter Warren | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Akella Janaki | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Leech Christopher T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Wolberg Kirsten O. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Matheson James D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| MILLERCHIP GARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| GREIG HENRY F | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Schneck-Last Vivian C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,349 | +7,349 | — |
| Akella Janaki | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 19,946 | +7,349 | — |
| Blackley Richard Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 40,421 | +7,349 | — |
| Franke Mary Carter Warren | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 104,998 | +7,349 | — |
| Greenstein Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 12,747 | +7,349 | — |
| GREIG HENRY F | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 15,840 | +7,349 | — |
| Lavelle Mark L | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 85,764 | +7,349 | — |
| Leech Christopher T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 19,946 | +7,349 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
17,441,002 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 20,262,204 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology