Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Retail · ·
344.50 ₪
▲ 1.80 ₪ (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 01:31 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
337.80 ₪ - 344.50 ₪
52-Week Range
286.60 ₪ - 425.90 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+14.2% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/12 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
CMF (money flow)
CMF 20 days: 0.13
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
RMLI.TA receives an overall StockIQ investor score of 58, placing it in a MODERATE rating category. This score reflects a blend of constructive short-term technical indicators alongside notable long-term and volume-related concerns, combined with neutral risk and news metrics. The technical pillar leads the assessment with a score of 63. Demonstrating near-term strength, the price currently trades above its 50-day moving average and its Parabolic SAR point, reflecting an intact short-term uptrend. Additional momentum metrics reinforce this positive picture: the MACD histogram is positive, the 12-day Rate of Change stands at 2.1%, and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) registers a healthy 58.3. However, the technical profile encounters resistance as the price remains positioned below its 200-day moving average. Furthermore, the stock displays a stochastic %K reading of 85.2, signaling overbought conditions, while trading volume has been falling despite the recent price advance, hinting at potential momentum exhaustion. Relative strength is also subdued, with the stock lagging the broader index by -8.1% over the last three months. Both the news and risk categories record neutral scores of 50. The news assessment reflects a complete lack of available headline sentiment evidence. The risk category incorporates an Average True Range (ATR) equal to 2.4% of the stock's price, denoting moderate daily volatility. It also highlights a Calmar ratio of 0.82, derived from a robust 18.4% 3-year annualized return paired with a 22.5% maximum drawdown over the same period. Together, these indicators explain the moderate overall score.
Price is above the 50-day average, MACD is positive, and RSI is 58.3, but price remains below the 200-day average with an overbought %K of 85.2.
Short-term momentum is rising, but trading below the 200-day average and overbought signals indicate potential overhead resistance.
No recent news evidence or headline sentiment data was recorded for this stock.
Without news data, market sentiment catalysts cannot be factored into the valuation model.
The stock has an ATR of 2.4% of price and a Calmar ratio of 0.82 based on an 18.4% 3-year annualized return and 22.5% max drawdown.
These metrics reflect moderate price volatility balanced against historical return and drawdown characteristics.
StockIQ conclusion
RMLI.TA holds a MODERATE rating with an investor score of 58, driven by a mixed technical landscape and neutral fundamental risk metrics. While positive short-term momentum is supported by the 50-day moving average, MACD, and SAR, long-term resistance at the 200-day moving average, overbought %K levels, and falling volume introduce headwinds. Coupled with neutral news sentiment and an ATR of 2.4%, the data establishes a balanced, moderate outlook.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
34
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
24
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING RMLI.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
5
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
—
Technical
24
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is strongly anchored to a near-term resistance level (1.4% away), indicating traders are likely basing decisions on this psychological barrier rather than broader momentum or sentiment. The mild herd behavior (47 score) suggests some passive following of peers, but it’s overshadowed by the dominance of anchoring. The narrow narrative gap (-3) implies a modest disconnect between perception and reality, but the key question remains: will traders break above resistance or retreat further, validating or invalidating this anchor?
Updated: 09/05/2026, 07:20 PM
What could change this?
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on documented principles, models focused on market sentiment and cycle timing evaluate the stock favorably, with Charles Mackay noting an absence of crowd mania and Howard Marks seeing a reasonable risk profile in an early-to-mid cycle position. Conversely, trend-focused strategies like Jesse Livermore's reject the stock due to a negative price trend that conflicts with momentum rules. Meanwhile, fundamental frameworks including Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch remain neutral strictly due to a lack of sufficient growth, balance sheet, and valuation data. Ultimately, the model estimates a split where macro and cycle-oriented frameworks identify favorable positioning, while trend followers and data-driven fundamentalists find either negative momentum or insufficient financial metrics.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 98
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 71
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 51
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 254 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
325.00 ₪
Range Bottom
375.80 ₪
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | 362.961 ₪ |
| 9.6.2026 | 421.035 ₪ |
| 8.6.2026 | 421.035 ₪ |
| 13.4.2026 | 304.887 ₪ |
| 12.4.2026 | 304.887 ₪ |
| 7.12.2025 | 297.628 ₪ |
| 6.12.2025 | 297.628 ₪ |
| 27.8.2025 | 377.480 ₪ |
| 26.8.2025 | 377.480 ₪ |
| 10.6.2025 | 326.665 ₪ |
| 9.6.2025 | 326.665 ₪ |
| 6.4.2025 | 399.257 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Rami Levi Chain Stores Hashikma Marketing 2006 Ltd (RMLI.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for RMLI.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
RMLI.TA's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: CMF 20 days: 0.13.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — RMLI.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology