Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
845.20 ₪
▼ 32.70 ₪ (-3.7%)
Market data updated: 09/17 06:06 AM
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
845.20 ₪ - 857.50 ₪
52-Week Range
614.50 ₪ - 924.10 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
PAZ.TA is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+42.0% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
PAZ.TA demonstrates a **strong overall investor score of 75**, driven primarily by robust technical performance and moderate risk management, though its news sentiment remains neutral. The technical category scores exceptionally high at **88**, reflecting a clear upward trend with the stock price consistently above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside positive momentum indicators (MACD and RSI). While the RSI suggests healthy upward momentum, the %K value at **91.3** indicates an overbought condition, which could signal potential short-term volatility or a pullback. The risk category scores **58**, highlighting a balanced risk-reward profile with a **Calmar ratio of 2.00** (indicating strong risk-adjusted returns) and a manageable average true range (ATR) of **2.7%**, suggesting controlled volatility. However, the news category scores **50**, reflecting a lack of recent material developments or market sentiment data, which could limit broader context for valuation or future expectations.
The stock exhibits strong bullish momentum with prices above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 67.1, though it is currently overbought (%K at 91.3).
Technical strength indicates sustained upward momentum, but overbought conditions may warrant caution against near-term reversals.
No recent news or sentiment data is available to assess market perception or external catalysts.
Lack of news data means the stock’s valuation lacks contextual drivers from recent events or market narratives.
The stock shows a strong risk-adjusted return (Calmar ratio of 2.00) with a moderate ATR of 2.7%, indicating controlled volatility and resilience.
A high Calmar ratio suggests efficient risk management, but volatility levels remain a key consideration for traders.
StockIQ conclusion
PAZ.TA presents a **strong technical profile** with clear upward momentum, supported by risk-adjusted returns and controlled volatility. However, the lack of recent news and an overbought technical reading introduce caution. Investors should monitor for potential pullbacks or external catalysts, as the stock’s strength hinges on sustained momentum without adverse macroeconomic or sector-specific disruptions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
39
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING PAZ.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
8
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
—
Technical
39
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
41
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior reflects traders’ fixation on a near-term resistance level (1.1% away), overriding other signals. FOMO exists but is muted by neutral sentiment and moderate momentum, while herding remains weak. The narrow narrative gap (3 points) suggests no extreme misalignment between market perception and fundamentals. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat if momentum stalls?
Updated: 09/05/2026, 07:19 PM
What could change this?
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with scores ranging from a cautious 68 to a stark 5—reflecting deep philosophical and analytical differences. Howard Marks and Charles Mackay, both leaning toward relative value and crowd psychology, see *some* merit: Marks flags no obvious cycle-timing red flags, while Mackay notes early signs of speculative excitement, suggesting a moderate opportunity. In contrast, the quantitative and trend-focused approaches—like Jack Schwager’s disciplined wizards or Samuel Nelson’s cycle analysis—reject the stock outright, with Nelson warning of overbought conditions and Schwager’s wizards dismissing it entirely. Meanwhile, the fundamentalists (Graham, Fisher, Lynch) and behavioral economists (Veblen) are stymied by data gaps, leaving them unable to form a definitive verdict, while the efficient-market camp (Malkiel/Bogle) dismisses it as unexceptional compared to broader indices. The debate hinges on whether to trust subjective market signals (Marks/Mackay) or hard trend/valuation signals (Schwager/Nelson), with the middle ground (Housel) acknowledging it’s holdable but not effortless.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 93
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 44
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 253 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | 1,207.527 ₪ |
| 14.6.2026 | 1,207.527 ₪ |
| 26.3.2026 | 1,858.430 ₪ |
| 25.3.2026 | 1,858.430 ₪ |
| 8.12.2025 | 1,115.480 ₪ |
| 7.12.2025 | 1,115.480 ₪ |
| 8.9.2025 | 1,118.762 ₪ |
| 7.9.2025 | 1,118.762 ₪ |
| 10.6.2025 | 1,213.242 ₪ |
| 9.6.2025 | 1,213.242 ₪ |
| 25.3.2025 | 701.579 ₪ |
| 24.3.2025 | 701.579 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Paz Retail and Energy Ltd (PAZ.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for PAZ.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
PAZ.TA's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; +5.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index; CMF 20 days: 0.10.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — PAZ.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology