Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$36.74
▼ $0.25 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:35 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$6.88B
Day Range
$36.29 - $37.04
52-Week Range
$27.54 - $48.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$27.54
Resistance
$39.13
+2.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1111.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is below the 200-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202666
This Week
71
7D Ago
↓ -5
Weakening
Technical
57
7D Ago: 77
↓ -20
Fundamental
80
7D Ago: 80
→ 0
Growth
66
7D Ago: 66
→ 0
Valuation
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
News
98
7D Ago: 100
→ -2
Quality
55
7D Ago: 55
→ 0
Risk
62
7D Ago: 62
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
66 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
70
$38.92
Now
66
$36.74
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
57
Risk
62
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
80
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **OR Royalties Inc.** has primarily focused on its financial performance, particularly the **62% revenue increase in Q2 2026**, driven by rising metal prices and production growth. The company also made headlines for a **share purchase agreement with Sailfish Royalty Corp.** in April 2026, though no further details were provided. No direct commentary on OR Royalties’ core operations or strategic shifts was found—only indirect references to its royalty-focused business model in broader precious metals sector reports.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about OR Royalties Inc. Common. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
21
Fundamentals
80
Technical
57
Valuation
50
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (20-point divergence) where euphoric optimism (score 25) and FOMO (34) dominate, fueled by perfect sentiment and strong momentum. The disconnect between price gains (+6.9% ROC) and EPS growth (+11.1%) hints at detached valuation, while anchoring remains weak. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will reality (e.g., lagging fundamentals) eventually rebalance expectations?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:04 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Revenue jumped 62% on higher metal prices and production gains."
"Sailfish closed the share purchase agreement with OR Royalties Inc. pursuant to which the Company sold all of the issued and outstanding shares."
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each methodology, the model estimates that the very high scores from Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot and Smith reflect a consensus that the stock shows strong growth potential, ample liquidity and a long‑term holding appeal, even though Fisher notes insufficient fundamentals for a full read. In contrast, Graham’s defensive criteria and Livermore’s trend rule generate low scores, indicating concerns about valuation, safety margins and a negative price trend. Marks, Veblen, Housel and the cycle‑focused analysts land in the middle, acknowledging a good business but warning that expectations may be elevated, the market may be late‑cycle, or the growth may not yet translate into profits. The efficient‑market view and Schwager’s disciplined trading framework also rate the stock modestly, suggesting limited evidence for out‑performance and recommending a cautious or out‑of‑position stance.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
83.8%
Operating Margin
90.2%
Net Margin
74.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
14.4%
ROA
13.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.10
Cash
—
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
4.53
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.065 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.065 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.055 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.055 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.055 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.055 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.045 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.045 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.045 |
| 30.12.2024 | $0.045 |
| 27.9.2024 | $0.048 |
| 26.9.2024 | $0.048 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$7.65
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
TMX Newsfile · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.8.2026
Moby · 6.8.2026
OR Royalties Inc. Common (OR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OR currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
OR's technical score is 57/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1111.1%; Net income growth: 1166.9%; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — OR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,270,310 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,527,518 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology