Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
234.00 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:43 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
231.00 ₪ - 238.20 ₪
52-Week Range
⚠️ Data anomaly
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
194.60 ₪
Resistance
257.00 ₪
NXSN.TA is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+18620.0% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 10/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 26.53 (3y annualized return 917.2% / max drawdown 34.6%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
NXSN.TA’s overall investor score of 46 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile, tempered by a neutral news environment. The stock exhibits strong momentum indicators—such as a positive MACD histogram and a price position above the 200-day average—suggesting a sustained uptrend, while the Calmar ratio (25.46) highlights exceptional risk-adjusted returns despite a historically high drawdown (34.6%). However, short-term weakness is evident in the price’s subpar performance relative to the 50-day average and a negative ROC (-1.8%), alongside modest volatility (ATR 5.1%). These contradictions create a nuanced picture: the stock’s long-term resilience contrasts with near-term underperformance, leaving room for interpretation of whether current weakness is temporary or indicative of deeper structural challenges.
The stock shows conflicting signals: positive momentum (MACD, uptrend) and above-200-day average pricing, but weak short-term bias (below 50-day average, RSI 47.6, negative ROC).
Short-term positioning relative to moving averages often signals near-term direction, while momentum indicators validate trend strength.
No explicit news-based evidence is provided, resulting in a neutral score (50) with no actionable insights.
Lack of news data means the score relies entirely on technical and risk factors, which may overlook external catalysts.
The ATR (5.1%) suggests low volatility, but the Calmar ratio (25.46) reveals extreme risk-adjusted returns with a 34.6% historical drawdown.
High drawdowns imply potential for sharp corrections, even if volatility is currently contained.
StockIQ conclusion
NXSN.TA demonstrates resilience in long-term performance and momentum but faces short-term challenges, including underperformance relative to its 50-day average and weak momentum indicators. The stock’s high risk-adjusted returns and low volatility provide a foundation for cautious optimism, though historical drawdowns and lack of news context introduce uncertainty. Investors should monitor technical breakouts and external developments to gauge whether current weakness is transient or indicative of deeper issues.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
68
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
78
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING NXSN.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
—
Technical
78
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
50
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+0
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (64) reflects a market behavior consistent with defensive positioning after a steep 24.1% decline, where traders prioritize locking in gains or reducing exposure. The **Herding** score (29) suggests lingering interest, but the stock’s underperformance relative to peers (+0.5% vs. +2.2%) implies selective participation rather than blind alignment. Meanwhile, **Euphoria** (17) is muted by weak momentum and neutral sentiment, while **FOMO** and **Panic Selling** remain near-zero due to lack of volatility or extreme volume. The key open question is whether the subdued volume signals a bottoming trend or merely a pause in capitulation.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 07:18 PM
What could change this?
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 63/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that the more data‑driven value and growth frameworks (Smith, Livermore, Mackay, Marks‑cycle) register modestly positive scores, reflecting limited but some encouraging signals such as crowd excitement or a middle‑cycle position. In contrast, the broad market‑efficiency view and many classic fundamentals approaches (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Veblen, Graham‑Enterprising) default to neutral 50 scores because the required dividend, balance‑sheet or growth information is missing, leading them to deem the case inconclusive. More risk‑averse or contrarian lenses (Marks, Loeb, Schwager, Nelson, Housel) assign lower scores, highlighting concerns about high expectations, capital risk, lack of a clear setup, overbought conditions, or volatile price action. These divergences illustrate how each methodology’s core criteria—whether they emphasize cash flow, trend, market cycles, or risk tolerance—shape their distinct verdicts for the same stock.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 52
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 12
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 23.3.2026 | 170.637 ₪ |
| 22.3.2026 | 168.976 ₪ |
| 18.3.2025 | 124.141 ₪ |
| 17.3.2025 | 122.933 ₪ |
| 19.3.2024 | 52.789 ₪ |
| 18.3.2024 | 52.275 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for NextVision Stabilized Systems Ltd (NXSN.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for NXSN.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
NXSN.TA's technical score is 78/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 26.53 (3y annualized return 917.2% / max drawdown 34.6%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.1% of price; -10.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index; %K 87.3 — overbought.
Yes — NXSN.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology