Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$34.76
▼ $0.40 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:39 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$378.96M
Day Range
$34.12 - $35.19
52-Week Range
$23.82 - $35.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
Support
$29.64
Resistance
$35.48
+30.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $47.91 vs. price $34.76 (+37.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.24 (3y annualized return 9.0% / max drawdown 37.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
71
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 4, 2026
Then
70
$34.66
Now
71
$34.76
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
90
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
55
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Norwood Financial Corp. has centered on its financial performance and investor-friendly initiatives. The company announced a new stock repurchase program, allowing up to 550,000 shares to be bought back, while analysts and financial platforms have highlighted its strong dividend potential and record net income in Q2 2026. A price target increase by Stephens & Co. also underscored positive market sentiment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Norwood Financial Corp.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 7 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
55
Technical
90
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
46
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers despite NWFL’s relative outperformance, possibly due to proximity to resistance. Mild FOMO and anchoring near resistance imply cautious optimism, while euphoria is tempered by valuation gaps. The narrative-reality gap (6 points) hints at potential misalignment between perceived momentum and intrinsic value. The key question is whether traders will hold or exit as the stock approaches resistance, given the valuation discount.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:59 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Norwood Financial (NWFL) is highlighted as a 'great dividend stock' with strong dividend benefits for shareholders."
"Norwood Financial Corp. adopted a stock repurchase program for up to 550,000 shares, signaling shareholder value enhancement."
"Q2 2026 earnings call highlights included 'record net income' and strategic financial performance."
"Stephens & Co. raised Norwood Financial’s price target from $34 to $35 while maintaining an Equal-Weight rating."
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into starkly different camps, with some models seeing it as a high-potential opportunity while others flag it as risky or overvalued. Defensive value investors like Benjamin Graham and Peter Lynch both rate it highly—Graham’s model finds it attractive for a cautious portfolio, while Lynch sees it as a growth stock whose price hasn’t yet reflected its upside. Meanwhile, patient, long-term thinkers such as Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith also embrace it as a quiet compounder or decade-long hold, emphasizing stability and compounding potential. However, cyclical and contrarian voices like Howard Marks (market cycle) and Jack Schwager dismiss it outright, warning of late-cycle risks or a lack of disciplined setup. Even the efficient-market camp and enterprising Graham investors downplay its appeal, suggesting the stock’s case for outperformance is weak or overpriced. The divide hinges on whether the model prioritizes growth potential, defensive value, or macroeconomic caution—with some frameworks ignoring red flags others see.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 88
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 87
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 86
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 80
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 66
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 51
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 36
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
11.5%
ROA
1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.01
Cash
$44.44M
Total Debt
$14.71M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.7.2026 | $0.320 |
| 14.7.2026 | $0.320 |
| 15.4.2026 | $0.320 |
| 14.4.2026 | $0.320 |
| 15.1.2026 | $0.320 |
| 14.1.2026 | $0.320 |
| 15.10.2025 | $0.310 |
| 14.10.2025 | $0.310 |
| 15.7.2025 | $0.310 |
| 14.7.2025 | $0.310 |
| 15.4.2025 | $0.310 |
| 14.4.2025 | $0.310 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$34.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$47.91
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+37.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-2.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -2.3% | $28.59M | $26.23M |
| 2 | -1.1% | $28.28M | $23.81M |
| 3 | 0.1% | $28.32M | $21.87M |
| 4 | 1.3% | $28.69M | $20.33M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $29.41M | $19.11M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$29.25M
Terminal Value
$463.75M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$301.41M
Enterprise Value
$412.75M
Net Debt
$-29.72M
Equity Value
$442.47M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$26.06
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$26.02
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 17 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 27.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.7.2026
Moby · 23.7.2026
Benzinga · 23.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 22.7.2026
MarketBeat · 22.7.2026
Zacks · 22.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 22.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 21.7.2026
Zacks · 16.7.2026
Zacks · 15.7.2026
Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 71/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NWFL currently scores 71/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NWFL's estimated fair value is $47.91, which is 37.8% above the current price of $34.76. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NWFL's technical score is 90/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $47.91 vs. price $34.76 (+37.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 15150.0%; Free cash flow growth: 48.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.24 (3y annualized return 9.0% / max drawdown 37.2%); Return on assets (ROA): 1.1% — weak.
Yes — NWFL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORTE ANDREW | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 48 | +48 | $34.47 |
| Nolan Alexandra K | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Hungerford Meg L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Matergia Ralph A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| PHILLIPS KENNETH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Carroll Joseph W | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Nacinovich Marissa S | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Schmalzle Ronald R | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| LAMONT KEVIN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Gifford Jeffrey S | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Shook James | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| Andress Spencer J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 39 | +39 | $34.47 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | — |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 750 | -750 | — |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 750 | +750 | $22.37 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $26.93 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | — |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | — |
| O'Bell Vincent | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $34.50 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $34.50 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 300 | -300 | $34.68 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $32.81 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $34.61 |
| O'Bell Vincent | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $32.34 |
| Gifford Jeffrey S | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 40 | +40 | $34.02 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
153,518 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 125,968 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology