Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$10.68
▲ $0.08 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:03 PM
Fundamentals updated: 08/06/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$61.33B
Day Range
$10.52 - $10.86
52-Week Range
$4.63 - $17.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$8.37
Resistance
$12.62
NOK is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+124.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.21
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $3.56 vs. price $10.68 (-66.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $10.68
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 42 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $10.13
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 9 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
11d ago · $10.75
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 3 to 33 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
47
Value
33
Momentum
69
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
54
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Nokia Corporation has focused on its stock performance and strategic initiatives in the telecom sector. Headlines highlight Nokia’s share price surge, attributed to its leadership in AI-driven network innovation, including the launch of an early-access mobile core solution and an industry-first initiative to accelerate operator innovation. The company’s expansion into AI-focused telecom technologies has been a recurring theme, alongside broader tech stock market trends. Notably, Nokia’s growth appears tied to its pivot beyond China, though analysts debate whether the rally reflects genuine progress or speculative momentum.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Nokia Corporation Sponsored. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
56
Fundamentals
54
Technical
69
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-21%
Market Narrative
85
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+48
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for NOK suggests a dominant **overconfidence** bias, fueled by a disconnect between price momentum (+5.9%) and stagnant EPS growth (-0.5%), alongside extreme valuation (+199% vs. DCF). While FOMO and euphoria are present, the narrative gap (76 vs. 37) implies traders may be overestimating fundamentals. Loss aversion also lingers, as the 3-month decline (-19.8%) could deter aggressive selling. The key question: *Will traders remain anchored to recent gains despite valuation extremes?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:55 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Nokia launches industry-first initiative to help operators accelerate network innovation in the AI era"
"Nokia targets digital healthcare with Network as Code platform for telecom-grade security in healthcare apps"
"Nokia opened a research and development center in Saudi Arabia focused on AI-powered network automation and 6G"
"Nokia Launches Mobile Core Early Access for Telecom Sector"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 63/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts between methodologies prioritizing caution and those favoring growth or momentum. The most bullish signals—from Edgar Lawrence Smith and Howard Marks (Market Cycle)—suggest it’s a *reasonable* but not overwhelmingly compelling long-term bet, with Smith’s score implying it’s a niche play rather than a core holding, while Marks’ cycle-based approach sees it as mid-cycle, neither a buy nor a sell. Meanwhile, the middle-ground thinkers like Charles Mackay and Walter Bagehot flag early signs of speculative excitement or thin liquidity, hinting at potential crowd-driven volatility. At the other extreme, the majority of value-oriented and defensive frameworks—from Graham to Fisher—reject it outright, with Fisher and Veblen dismissing it as lacking the quality or growth traits they demanded, while Graham’s strict criteria find it statistically overpriced. The most bearish signals, like Livermore’s trend-following rule or Nelson’s overbought cycle warning, paint it as a high-risk, volatile stock that would violate core principles of trend alignment or cyclical discipline.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 46
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 28
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 26
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 24
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 22
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 10
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
43.5%
Operating Margin
4.5%
Net Margin
3.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
3.1%
ROA
1.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.11
Cash
$5.46B
Total Debt
$5.21B
Current Ratio
1.58
Debt/Equity
0.21
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.7.2025 | $0.047 |
| 28.7.2025 | $0.047 |
| 5.5.2025 | $0.046 |
| 4.5.2025 | $0.046 |
| 4.2.2025 | $0.031 |
| 3.2.2025 | $0.031 |
| 22.10.2024 | $0.033 |
| 21.10.2024 | $0.033 |
| 23.7.2024 | $0.032 |
| 22.7.2024 | $0.032 |
| 22.4.2024 | $0.043 |
| 21.4.2024 | $0.043 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$10.68
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$3.56
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-66.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $1.39B | $1.28B |
| 2 | -3.1% | $1.35B | $1.13B |
| 3 | -1.2% | $1.33B | $1.03B |
| 4 | 0.6% | $1.34B | $949.10M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.37B | $892.50M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.47B
Terminal Value
$21.65B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$14.07B
Enterprise Value
$19.36B
Net Debt
$-251.89M
Equity Value
$19.61B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.76
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.51
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Nokia Corporation Sponsored (NOK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NOK currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NOK's estimated fair value is $3.56, which is 66.6% below the current price of $10.68. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NOK's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.21; Current ratio: 1.58; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $3.56 vs. price $10.68 (-66.6%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.0% of price.
Yes — NOK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
58,011,999 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 36,602,951 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
32.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 34.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology