Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Insurance · ·
533.90 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/15 10:17 PM
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
524.60 ₪ - 542.40 ₪
52-Week Range
277.10 ₪ - 574.00 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+89.0% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 10/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 3.49 (3y annualized return 81.7% / max drawdown 23.4%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Parabolic SAR
Price is below the SAR point — downtrend
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
MMHD.TA demonstrates a balanced yet nuanced profile, with a strong overall investor score of 74 and a 'STRONG' rating, primarily driven by robust technical performance and moderate risk metrics. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 85, reflecting a clear upward momentum—price sits comfortably above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, while the MACD histogram confirms rising bullish momentum. However, the RSI (74.5) and %K (91.1) signal overbought conditions, which could indicate potential short-term volatility or a need for consolidation. The news category, scoring 56, reveals mixed sentiment with neutral and positive headlines dominating, though a single negative data point (e.g., the dismissed lawsuit) introduces minor uncertainty. Risk metrics, scoring 58, highlight a manageable drawdown (23.4% over three years) and a Calmar ratio of 3.82, suggesting resilience despite volatility. The 3-year annualized return of 89.3% further underscores strong performance, though the ATR (3.2%) hints at moderate price swings.
The stock exhibits strong bullish momentum with price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and a 17.8% outperformance over the last three months. However, technical indicators like RSI (74.5) and %K (91.1) signal overbought conditions, which may suggest near-term caution.
Technical strength indicates sustained upward momentum, but overbought signals could precede a pullback or correction.
News coverage is predominantly neutral or positive, with a single negative event (dismissed lawsuit) and no direct company-specific bearish headlines. Broader market-related news (e.g., Nvidia, mortgage rates) dominates the narrative.
Mixed but largely positive sentiment supports investor confidence, though the absence of negative company-specific news could mask hidden risks.
The stock demonstrates strong risk-adjusted returns with a Calmar ratio of 3.82 and a 3-year annualized return of 89.3%, though the max drawdown stands at 23.4%. ATR (3.2%) indicates moderate volatility.
High returns and manageable drawdowns suggest resilience, but volatility remains a key consideration for risk-sensitive investors.
StockIQ conclusion
MMHD.TA presents a compelling case with strong technical indicators, high returns, and positive news sentiment, earning a 'STRONG' rating. However, overbought conditions and moderate volatility introduce caution, while mixed news and limited company-specific analysis leave room for uncertainty. The stock’s resilience in risk-adjusted returns and momentum suggests potential for continued growth, but investors should monitor technical signals and news developments closely to navigate potential short-term volatility.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
72
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 11, 2026
Then
77
$533.90
Now
72
$533.90
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
81
Risk
58
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING MMHD.TA...
The provided sources do not mention **Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd.** or any related news. As a result, there is no available English-language media coverage to summarize. No details about the company’s recent activities, financial performance, or events can be accurately reflected based on the given headlines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd. News trend score: 56. Reason: 3 of the last 10 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
25
Fundamentals
—
Technical
81
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+18%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+3
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by **anchoring**, as traders appear fixated on the near resistance (1.8% away), despite FOMO and euphoria signals from momentum and sentiment. The narrative gap (9 points) suggests traders may overestimate recent gains relative to fundamentals. Herding behavior aligns with peers, but the lack of panic or overconfidence signals keeps the bias tempered. The key question: *Will traders break free from the resistance anchor, or will it hold as a psychological barrier?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 12:50 PM
What could change this?
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each methodology, the model estimates that trend‑focused investors like Livermore (score 70) and Mackay (score 63) see a positive price pattern and growing crowd enthusiasm, while Marks (score 61) acknowledges a solid business but worries that expectations may already be baked in. In contrast, many fundamental‑value approaches—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Veblen, and Graham’s enterprising variant—all score around 50 because they lack sufficient dividend, balance‑sheet, growth, or insider data to form a concrete judgment. The efficient‑market view (score 45) and Schwager (score 43) find the evidence for an edge weak, and Marks’ market‑cycle lens (score 38) flags a late‑cycle position that would merit extra caution. Housel (score 32) and Nelson (score 14) focus on volatility and cyclical over‑extension, respectively, leading them to view the stock as particularly risky or overbought.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 66
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 22
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 251 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.9.2026 | 800.228 ₪ |
| 13.4.2026 | 800.433 ₪ |
| 12.4.2026 | 800.433 ₪ |
| 8.9.2025 | 721.447 ₪ |
| 7.9.2025 | 721.447 ₪ |
| 24.3.2025 | 240.587 ₪ |
| 23.3.2025 | 240.587 ₪ |
| 8.12.2024 | 185.408 ₪ |
| 7.12.2024 | 185.408 ₪ |
| 5.9.2024 | 274.161 ₪ |
| 4.9.2024 | 274.161 ₪ |
| 8.4.2024 | 282.489 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 10 articles.
Yahoo Finance · 29.8.2026
Motley Fool · 29.8.2026
Motley Fool · 29.8.2026
The Tribune-Democrat, Johnstown, Pa. · 29.8.2026
Yahoo Personal Finance · 29.8.2026
AFP · 29.8.2026
AFP · 29.8.2026
AFP · 29.8.2026
Motley Fool · 29.8.2026
Moneywise · 29.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd (MMHD.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for MMHD.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
MMHD.TA's technical score is 81/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 3.49 (3y annualized return 81.7% / max drawdown 23.4%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — MMHD.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology