Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Insurance · ·
21.39 ₪
▲ 0.51 ₪ (+2.4%)
Market data updated: 09/18 05:08 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
20.88 ₪ - 21.39 ₪
52-Week Range
10.12 ₪ - 22.04 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+116.1% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.58 (3y annualized return 66.7% / max drawdown 25.8%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
MGDL.TA demonstrates a robust technical profile, supported by a **technical score of 82**, where its price remains firmly above both the 50-day (10.2%) and 200-day (15.7%) moving averages, signaling sustained bullish momentum. The MACD histogram’s positivity and a **19.3% outperformance over the last three months** relative to its index underscore strong relative strength, while the **Calmar ratio of 2.62**—calculated from a **67.7% annualized return** and a **25.8% max drawdown**—highlights efficient risk-adjusted performance. However, the **RSI at 80.6** and **%K at 95.8** indicate the stock is nearing overbought conditions, which could signal potential short-term volatility or a pullback. The **risk score of 58** reflects moderate volatility (ATR at 2.9% of price) but is tempered by the high return profile. Meanwhile, the **news score of 50**—lacking specific evidence—suggests limited recent market sentiment or fundamental catalysts, which could introduce uncertainty compared to the clear technical signals.
The stock exhibits strong momentum with price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and a 19.3% outperformance over the last three months. However, RSI and %K readings indicate overbought conditions.
Technical strength suggests sustained upward pressure, but overbought signals may precede a correction or consolidation.
No explicit news or fundamental evidence is provided to support or detract from the stock’s valuation.
Lack of news data means the analysis relies solely on technical and risk metrics, introducing ambiguity around broader market or company-specific drivers.
The ATR of 2.9% of price indicates moderate volatility, while the Calmar ratio of 2.62 (67.7% return with a 25.8% drawdown) suggests efficient risk management over three years.
The risk profile balances high returns with controlled drawdowns, but volatility remains a factor in near-term price movements.
StockIQ conclusion
MGDL.TA presents a compelling technical case with strong momentum, efficient risk-adjusted returns, and relative outperformance, supported by an **investor score of 71 (STRONG)**. However, overbought conditions and the absence of news or fundamental data introduce uncertainty. The stock’s strength lies in its technical performance and risk management, but investors should monitor for potential corrections or external catalysts that could alter its trajectory.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202665
This Week
74
7D Ago
↓ -9
Weakening
Technical
72
7D Ago: 87
↓ -15
News
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Risk
58
7D Ago: 58
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
65 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
74
$20.70
Now
65
$21.39
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
72
Risk
58
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING MGDL.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
—
Technical
72
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+29%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+2
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring bias (84) reflects traders fixating on the 0.8% resistance gap, while FOMO (52) and euphoria (35) indicate momentum-driven urgency. The narrative gap (9) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and neutral fundamentals. Key uncertainty lies in whether the stock can sustain momentum past resistance or if traders will pivot on a failed breakout. The low panic score (1) suggests no immediate liquidation pressure, but anchoring could trigger sharp reversals if resistance holds.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:51 PM
What could change this?
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jack Schwager — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that Livermore’s momentum‑focused read (score 70) and Mackay’s crowd‑psychology lens (score 67) see a positive trend or growing excitement, while Marks (score 65) and Loeb (score 56) view the risk as reasonably priced but only moderate. In contrast, a large group of value‑oriented frameworks—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Veblen, and Graham’s enterprising variant—are constrained by missing balance‑sheet, dividend, or growth data, resulting in neutral midpoint scores around 50. The efficient‑market view (score 48) and Schwager’s systematic edge analysis (score 46) suggest the stock does not offer a clear advantage over broader indices, and Housel’s behavioral take (score 45) flags it as merely holdable. Finally, Nelson’s cycle‑timing model (score 23) signals a stretched, potentially overbought condition, pulling the overall consensus toward caution.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 72
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 44
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 3
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 254 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.12.2024 | 2.847 ₪ |
| 14.12.2024 | 2.847 ₪ |
| 18.6.2024 | 2.372 ₪ |
| 17.6.2024 | 2.372 ₪ |
| 18.12.2023 | 2.372 ₪ |
| 17.12.2023 | 2.372 ₪ |
| 1.5.2023 | 3.036 ₪ |
| 30.4.2023 | 3.036 ₪ |
| 26.10.2021 | 4.460 ₪ |
| 25.10.2021 | 4.460 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings Ltd (MGDL.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for MGDL.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
MGDL.TA's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.58 (3y annualized return 66.7% / max drawdown 25.8%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; RSI 72.5 — approaching overbought territory; %K 100.0 — overbought.
Yes — MGDL.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology