Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$3.69
▲ $0.22 (+6.3%)
Market data updated: 09/18 01:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$57.34M
Day Range
$3.62 - $3.78
52-Week Range
$2.34 - $12.37
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
HYPD is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
-70.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 1318.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -5456.5% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
76
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
39
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Hyperion DeFi, Inc.** has centered on its **Q2 2026 earnings call**, highlighting a **strategic pivot** amid the "USDH sunset" (a collapsing stablecoin). The company reported a **56% increase in HYPE token holdings**, secured new partnerships, and maintained an **overweight rating** from Cantor Fitzgerald, which raised its price target to **$7.1**. Analysts praised its adaptability, though broader blockchain market trends—like 24/7 oil trading via blockchain—were mentioned only tangentially. No direct Hyperion DeFi involvement in those developments was noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Hyperion DeFi, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
51
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
73
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
39
Technical
76
Valuation
50
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
87
Fundamental Reality
73
Narrative Gap
+14
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
HYPD’s psychology is dominated by **FOMO** (34) and **Euphoria** (23), fueled by extreme positive sentiment and strong momentum despite neutral RSI. The disconnect between price gains (+8.6% ROC) and modest EPS growth (+0.8%) suggests **overconfidence** may be amplifying speculative interest. The narrative gap (2 points) is narrow, implying no severe misalignment between market perception and fundamentals. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will volume/RSI break above neutral to confirm FOMO?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:33 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Hyperion DeFi Inc. (NASDAQ: $HYPD) reported a second straight record quarter as gains across its HYPE treasury push..."
"Hyperion DeFi Inc (HYPD) navigates the USDH sunset with agile redeployment, boosting HYPE holdings by 56%"
"Cantor Fitzgerald raises the price target from $6.6 to $7.1"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with Benjamin Graham’s models—both defensive and enterprising—unanimously rating it as a standout opportunity, scoring near perfection due to its deep valuation and statistical discount. Meanwhile, growth-focused investors like Peter Lynch see potential, though less aggressively, while value-oriented strategists like Howard Marks and Gerald Loeb express caution, flagging either stretched expectations or elevated risk. The middle-ground approaches, such as Walter Bagehot’s liquidity assessment or Philip Fisher’s quality standards, fall short of enthusiasm, while behavioral and market-cycle analysts—like Morgan Housel and Samuel Nelson—warn of speculative overreach or volatility risks. The contrast highlights a tension between Graham’s value-driven optimism and the more skeptical, risk-averse or cycle-sensitive frameworks.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 94
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 90
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 84
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 66
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 41
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 14
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
62.7%
Operating Margin
-5456.5%
Net Margin
-5570.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-110.4%
ROA
-87.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$9.40
Cash
$6.44M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.68
Debt/Equity
0.19
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$4.73
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.36
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Bloomberg · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
CryptoProwl · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
CryptoProwl · 16.7.2026
CryptoProwl · 22.6.2026
Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (HYPD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HYPD currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
HYPD's technical score is 76/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 1318.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 84.3%; Debt/equity: 0.19.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -5456.5% (negative); Net margin: -5570.6% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for HYPD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 10 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jung Hyunsu | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | — |
| Walters Happy David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 58,917 | +58,917 | — |
| JACOBSON RACHEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 58,917 | +58,917 | — |
| Strahlman Ellen R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 58,917 | +58,917 | — |
| GELTZEILER MICHAEL S | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 58,917 | +58,917 | — |
| GELTZEILER MICHAEL S | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 146,932 | +58,917 | — |
| Strahlman Ellen R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 150,078 | +58,917 | — |
| JACOBSON RACHEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 115,218 | +58,917 | — |
| Walters Happy David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 170,847 | +58,917 | — |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 500 | +500 | $3.64 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 500 | +500 | $3.68 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 1,385,176 | +500 | $3.64 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 1,385,676 | +500 | $3.68 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $3.66 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $3.81 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 1,382,676 | +5,000 | $3.66 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 1,384,676 | +2,000 | $3.81 |
| Jung Hyunsu | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.5.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | — |
| Jung Hyunsu | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.5.2026 | 1,377,676 | -40,000 | — |
| Knox David R. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.3.2026 | 20,831 | -20,831 | — |
| Knox David R. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.3.2026 | 307,119 | -20,831 | — |
| Rubenstein Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.1.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Rubenstein Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.1.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Knox David R. | Open Market Purchase | 31.12.2025 | 27,950 | +27,950 | $3.59 |
| Knox David R. | Open Market Purchase | 31.12.2025 | 327,950 | +27,950 | $3.59 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,315,962 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,560,307 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology