Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$25.76
▼ $0.05 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:03 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$3.13B
Day Range
$25.54 - $25.88
52-Week Range
$22.65 - $30.58
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$25.17
Resistance
$30.27
-0.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/23 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 22.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 11.8% / max drawdown 25.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
33
Risk
56
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
55
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of First Hawaiian, Inc. has centered on its **dividend policy and analyst reactions**, with a focus on the company’s **$0.26 per-share dividend announcement** in late August 2026. Analysts have also adjusted their price targets—some raising it to **$32** while others lowering it to **$31**—alongside mixed assessments of its stock stability amid broader discussions on mid-cap investments. No major operational or financial crises were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about First Hawaiian, Inc.. News trend score: 26. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
55
Technical
33
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-8%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
-3
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** is dominant, as FHB’s underperformance relative to peers (-1.0% vs. -2.0%) may signal traders aligning with broader sector trends rather than independent conviction. Anchoring (36) hints at traders holding near support (3.2% above), possibly resisting further declines. The absence of FOMO or panic signals (scores of 0 or 13) implies neither urgency nor distress is driving activity. The key question: *Is this herding a tactical adjustment or a longer-term trend?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:00 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"First Hawaiian Inc recently announced a total dividend of $0.26 per share"
"TD Cowen lowers price target to $31; Stephens & Co. raises price target to $32"
"$2.02 billion acquisition by First Hawaiian (Sterlington Advises TriCo Bancshares)"
"BofA adjusts price target on First Hawaiian to $34 from $31 (upward) but TD Cowen lowers target to $31"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 51/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between fundamental value investors and speculative or cyclical strategists. The highest-scoring methodologies—like **Charles Mackay’s** (100) and **Benjamin Graham’s Defensive Investor** (92)—suggest it’s a stable, low-risk pick, free from crowd-driven hype or extreme valuation. Meanwhile, **Peter Lynch** (81) and **Howard Marks (Market Cycle)** (84) lean toward growth or mid-cycle opportunities, seeing upside in its underpriced potential or favorable market positioning. At the other end, **Jesse Livermore’s** (45) near-zero score and **Philip Fisher’s** (63) lukewarm verdict imply either a lack of clear momentum or subpar quality—key concerns for traders or contrarian hunters. The middle ground, where **Gerald Loeb** (73) and **Burton Malkiel/Bogle** (72) agree, hints at a balanced case: reasonable risk but not a slam-dunk for aggressive or passive strategies.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 97
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 93
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 86
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 85
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 82
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 81
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 72
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 72
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 63
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 60
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 57
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 51
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
31.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.0%
ROA
1.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.21
Cash
$1.48B
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.260 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.260 |
| 17.5.2026 | $0.260 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.260 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.260 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.260 |
| 16.11.2025 | $0.260 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.260 |
| 17.8.2025 | $0.260 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.260 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.260 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.260 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$22.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.13
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 10 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 16.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
The Fly · 6.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
StockStory · 31.7.2026
StockStory · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
Business Wire · 28.7.2026
MT Newswires · 28.7.2026
MT Newswires · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.7.2026
First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FHB currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FHB's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 22.9%; Net income growth: 20.0%; ATR: 1.8% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 11.8% / max drawdown 25.3%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — FHB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moffatt Jim | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| Freas Tertia M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| Thompson Kelly Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| Wo Craig Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| Fujimoto Michael K | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| WASHINGTON VANESSA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| Mugiishi Mark M | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 2,613 | +2,613 | — |
| WASHINGTON VANESSA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 22,256 | +2,613 | — |
| Wo Craig Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 50,808 | +2,613 | — |
| Thompson Kelly Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 16,854 | +2,613 | — |
| Moffatt Jim | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 16,854 | +2,613 | — |
| Fujimoto Michael K | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 18,263 | +2,613 | — |
| Mugiishi Mark M | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 13,574 | +2,613 | — |
| Freas Tertia M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.4.2026 | 7,124 | +2,613 | — |
| Anonuevo Gina O. W. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 414 | -414 | $24.76 |
| Char Neill | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 621 | -621 | $24.76 |
| Blakeney Darlene N. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 579 | -579 | $24.76 |
| Harrison Robert S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 5,169 | -5,169 | $24.76 |
| Arizumi Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 112 | -112 | $24.76 |
| Moses James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 1,448 | -1,448 | $24.76 |
| Nakamura Lea M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 775 | -775 | $24.76 |
| Arizumi Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 621 | -621 | $24.76 |
| Harrison Robert S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 535,194 | -5,169 | $24.76 |
| Moses James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 54,259 | -1,448 | $24.76 |
| Arizumi Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.2.2026 | 48,639 | -621 | $24.76 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,332,537 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,458,095 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology