Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$315.80
▲ $0.25 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 07:13 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$16.69B
Day Range
$311.88 - $317.50
52-Week Range
$201.34 - $335.94
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$299.16
Resistance
$335.94
CLH is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+33.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 27.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $102.01 vs. price $315.80 (-67.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
65
Risk
56
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Clean Harbors, Inc. has centered on its **$470 million acquisition of EnviroServe**, a strategic move to expand its environmental and industrial services portfolio. Analysts highlight strong waste-services demand, solid cash flow, and growth potential from acquisitions as reasons to hold its stock, though concerns remain about competition, currency risks, and the lack of a dividend. Additionally, the company’s co-CEO sold shares amid a 35.5% year-to-date stock rise, sparking speculation about market sentiment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Clean Harbors, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
65
Technical
65
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+9%
Market Narrative
69
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence (score 45) stems from a stark disconnect between CLH’s valuation (+211% above DCF) and its weak momentum. Euphoria (35) aligns with this gap, as traders may ignore lagging price action (+5.2% above 200-day avg) while anchoring to optimistic narratives. FOMO (11) is muted by subdued volume and negative ROC, while panic (3) remains irrelevant due to low volatility. The key question: *Will traders confront the reality of underperformance or double down on overvaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$470 million cash transaction to acquire EnviroServe... expected to conclude in the latter half of the year"
"Clean Harbors Co-CEO Gerstenberg sells 2,500 shares... stock price up 35.5% in 2026"
"Clean Harbors (CLH) reported earnings... stock down 1.7% since last earnings report"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 68/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts in methodology priorities. The more conservative investors—like Benjamin Graham (16) and Edgar Lawrence Smith (31)—reject it outright, flagging weak defensive metrics and instability, while Walter Bagehot (68) and Morgan Housel (62) see it as a *holdable* but unexceptional opportunity, prioritizing liquidity and manageable risk over extreme conviction. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Jesse Livermore (37) and Howard Marks (35) warn of late-cycle or negative momentum, aligning with their disciplined rules against speculative bets, whereas Philip Fisher (50) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (61) remain neutral, neither dismissing nor endorsing it as a standout pick. The divide underscores whether the stock’s risks are outweighed by its modest appeal—or whether it’s simply too ambiguous to justify a strong position under any single framework.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 68
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 67
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 31
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 26
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 16
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 2 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
31.3%
Operating Margin
11.2%
Net Margin
6.5%
EBITDA Margin
18.6%
ROE
14.2%
ROA
5.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.31
Cash
$826.32M
Total Debt
$2.78B
Current Ratio
2.33
Debt/Equity
1.01
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$315.80
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$102.01
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-67.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.3% | $465.33M | $426.91M |
| 2 | 4.6% | $486.83M | $409.75M |
| 3 | 3.9% | $505.87M | $390.63M |
| 4 | 3.2% | $522.09M | $369.86M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $535.15M | $347.81M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$441.81M
Terminal Value
$8.44B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.48B
Enterprise Value
$7.43B
Net Debt
$1.95B
Equity Value
$5.48B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$51.11
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.42
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 11 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Motley Fool · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CLH currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CLH's estimated fair value is $102.01, which is 67.7% below the current price of $315.80. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CLH's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 27.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 2.33.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $102.01 vs. price $315.80 (-67.7%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -1.9%; Net income growth: -2.8%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CLH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GERSTENBERG ERIC W | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $321.34 |
| Robertson Andrea | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 789 | -789 | $314.01 |
| Robertson Andrea | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 8,979 | -789 | $314.01 |
| MCKIM ALAN S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 1,265 | -1,265 | $310.58 |
| MCKIM ALAN S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 30,154 | -1,265 | $310.58 |
| GERSTENBERG ERIC W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 564 | -564 | $290.74 |
| Geer Charles H. II | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 40 | -40 | $290.74 |
| Underwood Rebecca | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 311 | -311 | $290.74 |
| Weber Brian P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 814 | -814 | $290.74 |
| Gabriel Sharon M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 359 | -359 | $290.74 |
| MCKIM ALAN S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 1,343 | -1,343 | $290.74 |
| Battles Michael Louis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 1,032 | -1,032 | $290.74 |
| Dugas Eric J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 447 | -447 | $290.74 |
| CURTIS GEORGE L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 1,757 | -1,757 | $290.74 |
| GERSTENBERG ERIC W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 59,293 | -564 | $290.74 |
| CURTIS GEORGE L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 44,291 | -1,757 | $290.74 |
| Battles Michael Louis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 94,355 | -1,032 | $290.74 |
| Dugas Eric J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 17,620 | -447 | $290.74 |
| MCKIM ALAN S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 31,419 | -1,343 | $290.74 |
| GERSTENBERG ERIC W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 38,313 | -564 | $290.74 |
| Weber Brian P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 47,914 | -814 | $290.74 |
| Dugas Eric J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 13,532 | -447 | $290.74 |
| Gabriel Sharon M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 20,706 | -359 | $290.74 |
| Underwood Rebecca | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 18,373 | -311 | $290.74 |
| Geer Charles H. II | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 10,799 | -40 | $290.74 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,050,899 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,311,094 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology