Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
436.00 ₪
▲ 0.00 ₪ (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:13 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
427.40 ₪ - 449.90 ₪
52-Week Range
304.50 ₪ - 616.00 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
382.00 ₪
Resistance
528.90 ₪
CAMT.TA is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+48.4% (1Y)
🔴 Weak
Strengths: 5/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
MACD
MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.7% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
CAMT.TA’s overall score of 34 reflects a mixed but predominantly weak technical and risk profile, despite a modest relative outperformance over the past three months. The stock’s technical indicators are overwhelmingly bearish, with prices consistently trading below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling a prolonged downward trend. The negative MACD histogram and RSI below 50 further underscore weakening momentum, while the Calmar ratio of 0.40—paired with a 60.1% historical drawdown—highlights extreme volatility and risk relative to returns. Though the news category lacks explicit negative sentiment (scoring 50), the absence of positive or constructive developments leaves no offsetting momentum. The ATR of 5.8% of price underscores the stock’s sensitivity to market swings, reinforcing the risk category’s low score. Together, these factors create a cautious outlook, where short-term gains are overshadowed by structural technical and volatility challenges.
The stock trades below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a negative MACD histogram and RSI of 47.1 indicating weak momentum and a bearish bias. These signals collectively suggest a prolonged downward trend with no immediate signs of reversal.
Technical weakness often precedes further price declines, particularly when momentum indicators align with extended drawdowns.
The news category has no recorded evidence or sentiment, resulting in a neutral score of 50 with no positive or negative influence on the stock’s narrative.
Lack of news activity means no external catalysts—either positive or negative—to alter the stock’s trajectory or investor perception.
The stock exhibits a Calmar ratio of 0.40 (3-year annualized return of 24.1% with a 60.1% max drawdown) and an ATR of 5.8% of price, indicating high volatility and significant drawdown risk relative to returns.
Such extreme volatility and drawdown potential make the stock a higher-risk proposition, particularly for investors sensitive to downside exposure.
StockIQ conclusion
CAMT.TA’s profile is defined by technical weakness, high volatility, and a lack of positive catalysts, resulting in a weak overall score. While the stock has shown modest relative outperformance recently, its prolonged drawdowns, negative momentum indicators, and extreme risk metrics suggest a challenging environment for investors. The absence of news or fundamental support leaves the stock vulnerable to further declines unless technical or macroeconomic conditions improve. Short-term traders may monitor volatility for trading opportunities, but long-term investors should proceed with caution given the structural risks.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
51
Risk
34
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING CAMT.TA...
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
—
Technical
51
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-25%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+6
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here suggests a **loss aversion** bias is actively shaping decisions, likely due to the stock’s prolonged decline (-17.4% over three months) and subdued trading volume. The absence of euphoria or overconfidence signals no speculative momentum, while herding is present but muted, reflecting cautious peer comparison. The narrative gap (-12) hints at a disconnect between market sentiment (more pessimistic) and technical reality (stable but weak). The key question remains whether the current consolidation will break downward or stabilize—triggered by volume spikes or a shift in sentiment.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:52 AM
What could change this?
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that Mackay’s high score and Marks’s cycle‑focused scores suggest the stock shows no crowd mania and appears early‑to‑mid cycle, implying a relatively benign market environment. In contrast, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Veblen and related approaches all sit at neutral 50 because their methods require detailed balance‑sheet, valuation or growth data that simply isn’t available for this ticker, so they can’t form a decisive view. The more discipline‑oriented frameworks of Schwager, Malkiel / Bogle, Livermore, Loeb and Smith assign low scores, reflecting their concern over missing setups, weak trends, elevated risk or insufficient dividend‑growth evidence. Morgan Housel’s zero score underscores the extreme volatility that would likely deter patient investors. Together, the spread of scores illustrates how methodological emphasis—cycle timing, data completeness, trend following, risk assessment, or index‑efficiency—drives divergent conclusions for CAMT.TA.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 89
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 87
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 37
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 32
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 30
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 14
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 255 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.4.2024 | 404.626 ₪ |
| 3.4.2024 | 399.077 ₪ |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Camtek Ltd (CAMT.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for CAMT.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
CAMT.TA's technical score is 51/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; RSI 50.6 — healthy positive momentum; Price is above the SAR point — uptrend.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.7% of price; Calmar: 0.44 (3y annualized return 26.3% / max drawdown 60.1%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — CAMT.TA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology