Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$94.32
▼ $0.15 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/21 01:17 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$3.19B
Day Range
$94.32 - $94.51
52-Week Range
$53.75 - $94.63
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$68.95
Resistance
$94.63
+55.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $107.31 vs. price $94.32 (+13.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -0.5% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
62
Momentum
71
Risk
56
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
37
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Atkore Inc.** highlights its strong recent stock performance, with a **62.8% year-to-date return** and notable gains over the past month (20.93%) and year (45.37%). Analysts suggest the stock now trades near fair value, with cash flow recovery from its electrical and infrastructure products supporting its valuation. Some reports question whether the stock is slightly overvalued, while others note a **13.56% price target increase**, reflecting mixed investor sentiment amid broader industrials sector volatility. Comparisons to peers like Generac Holdings also appear in coverage.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Atkore Inc.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
34
Psychology
93
Fundamentals
37
Technical
71
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+16%
Market Narrative
41
Fundamental Reality
34
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme anchoring (92) suggests traders are fixated on the 0.4% gap below resistance, overriding other signals. FOMO and euphoria coexist but are tempered by valuation metrics, while confirmation bias hints at selective fundamental disregard. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat if momentum stalls? The narrative gap widens, but anchoring’s grip may delay corrective action until a clear trigger emerges.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 04:50 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Atkore has delivered a strong 62.8% 1 year return... 30 day share price return of 20.93% and a year to date share price return of 45.37%"
"Atkore has delivered a strong 62.8% 1 year return, yet current checks suggest the stock now trades close to estimates of intrinsic value"
"this role also comes with a demand profile tethered to the ebbs and flows of the broader economy, and investors seem to be forecasting a downturn"
"Wall Street has issued downbeat forecasts for the stocks in this article"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ATKR reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors assess risk, valuation, and market psychology. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on liquidity and resilience in crises, while Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher’s low scores reveal their strict growth-and-quality thresholds—Lynch’s GARP framework and Fisher’s emphasis on long-term competitive advantage simply aren’t met here. Meanwhile, the middle-ground scores from Graham, Marks, and Loeb suggest a cautious but not outright dismissive stance, balancing valuation concerns with cyclical or structural risks. The contrast between Bagehot’s liquidity-first approach and Fisher’s quality obsession underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in defensive stability or transformative growth—neither of which the model finds compelling enough for the latter’s standards.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 76
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 62
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 59
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 52
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 19
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
23.7%
Operating Margin
0.8%
Net Margin
-0.5%
EBITDA Margin
5.2%
ROE
-1.1%
ROA
-0.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.45
Cash
$506.70M
Total Debt
$760.53M
Current Ratio
3.05
Debt/Equity
0.54
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.8.2026 | $0.330 |
| 19.5.2026 | $0.330 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.330 |
| 17.2.2026 | $0.330 |
| 16.2.2026 | $0.330 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.330 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.330 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.330 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.330 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.330 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.330 |
| 18.2.2025 | $0.320 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$94.32
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$107.31
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+13.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $280.87M | $257.68M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $272.09M | $229.02M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $268.69M | $207.48M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $270.37M | $191.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $277.13M | $180.12M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$295.65M
Terminal Value
$4.37B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.84B
Enterprise Value
$3.91B
Net Debt
$253.83M
Equity Value
$3.65B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$41.09
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$27.71
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 8 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 28.8.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
StockStory · 10.8.2026
Atkore Inc. (ATKR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ATKR currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ATKR's estimated fair value is $107.31, which is 13.8% above the current price of $94.32. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ATKR's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $107.31 vs. price $94.32 (+13.8%); ATR: 0.7% of price; Current ratio: 3.05.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -0.5% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.20 (3y annualized return -14.3% / max drawdown 73.1%).
Yes — ATKR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waltz William E Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 123,653 | +242 | — |
| Pregenzer John W | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 61,411 | +82 | — |
| MUSE SCOTT H | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 32,724 | +95 | — |
| Alvey James William | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 5,449 | +9 | — |
| James Wilbert W Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 17,191 | +60 | — |
| Edmonds Franklin S. Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 2,844 | +10 | — |
| Lamps Mark F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 35,850 | +47 | — |
| Isbell Jeri L | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 30,656 | +98 | — |
| WYNN BETTY R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 20,616 | +28 | — |
| Lowe LeAngela W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 36,063 | +36 | — |
| SCHROCK MICHAEL V | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 22,187 | +8 | — |
| Kelly Daniel S | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 32,666 | +36 | — |
| Kershaw Justin A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 18,750 | +66 | — |
| Zeffiro A Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 23,994 | +48 | — |
| Deitzer John Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 18,928 | +47 | — |
| Edwards Barbara Joanne | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 6,099 | +18 | — |
| Kershaw Justin A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 65.871 | +65.871 | — |
| Zeffiro A Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 48.35 | +48.35 | — |
| James Wilbert W Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 60.394 | +60.394 | — |
| Waltz William E Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 241.522 | +241.522 | — |
| Lowe LeAngela W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 35.998 | +35.998 | — |
| MUSE SCOTT H | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 94.948 | +94.948 | — |
| SCHROCK MICHAEL V | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 8.094 | +8.094 | — |
| Pregenzer John W | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 82.082 | +82.082 | — |
| Alvey James William | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 9.347 | +9.347 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,135,474 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,215,190 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
34.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 25.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology