Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$4.76
▲ $0.08 (+1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/16 04:39 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$17.17M
Day Range
$4.76 - $4.76
52-Week Range
$4.61 - $9.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
14.12.2026
-30.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$5.71 vs. price $4.76 (-220.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
30
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
43
Momentum
7
Risk
26
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
21
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Ark Restaurants Corp.** has centered on its **Q3 2026 earnings report**, which revealed a **year-over-year decline in sales and revenues**, prompting a stock dip. The company also faced scrutiny over its **long-standing legal battle to evict Bryant Park Grill and sister brands**, signaling potential resolution. Stock volatility was notable, with **pre-market gains of 14.3% on August 26** amid broader consumer discretionary sector movements, though no major strategic shifts were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ark Restaurants Corp.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 5 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
80
Fundamentals
21
Technical
7
Valuation
43
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-24%
Market Narrative
41
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ARKR’s psychology is fragmented, with **Panic Selling** (28) and **Loss Aversion** (13) as dominant forces—evidenced by negative momentum, elevated volume, and volatility. The narrative gap (+6) hints at **Confirmation Bias**, where investors cherry-pick positive signals despite weak fundamentals. However, no clear dominant state emerges, leaving the market in a cautious, indecisive state. The key question is whether elevated volume signals distress or a strategic reentry point.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:49 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Sales $40.881M Down From $43.715M YoY"
"Ark Restaurants shares increased by 14.3% to $5.5 during Wednesday’s pre-market session"
"Ark Restaurants admits long-battled eviction of Bryant Park Grill and sister brands could be coming"
"EPS $(0.10) Up From $(0.96) YoY"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between cautious, cyclical, and contrarian approaches versus more aggressive or fundamentalist frameworks. Methodologies like Mackay’s (91) and Nelson’s (65) see it as relatively stable or favorably positioned within a market cycle, suggesting it may not be in a speculative bubble or overbought. In contrast, Fisher (21), Lynch (20), and Loeb (13) dismiss it outright, either because it lacks the growth quality they demand or carries unacceptable risk—highlighting a tension between growth-at-any-cost and conservative value principles. Meanwhile, the lowest scores (Housel, Bagehot) flag systemic risks like illiquidity or volatility, while efficient-market adherents (Malkiel/Bogle) see no clear edge over passive indexing. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in cyclical timing, speculative momentum, or fundamental flaws.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 90
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 64
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 55
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 6
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 12 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-2.5%
Net Margin
-6.9%
EBITDA Margin
-0.6%
ROE
-35.0%
ROA
-8.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$3.18
Cash
$11.32M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.77
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.5.2024 | $0.188 |
| 30.5.2024 | $0.188 |
| 28.2.2024 | $0.188 |
| 27.2.2024 | $0.188 |
| 29.11.2023 | $0.188 |
| 28.11.2023 | $0.188 |
| 30.8.2023 | $0.188 |
| 29.8.2023 | $0.188 |
| 30.5.2023 | $0.188 |
| 29.5.2023 | $0.188 |
| 27.2.2023 | $0.125 |
| 26.2.2023 | $0.125 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$4.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$5.71
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-220.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-3.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.3% | $-1.45M | $-1.33M |
| 2 | -1.8% | $-1.42M | $-1.20M |
| 3 | -0.4% | $-1.41M | $-1.09M |
| 4 | 1.1% | $-1.43M | $-1.01M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.47M | $-952.49K |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.50M
Terminal Value
$-23.11M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-15.02M
Enterprise Value
$-20.60M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-20.60M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.08
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.08
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 13 articles.
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.8.2026
Nation's Restaurant News · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
Moby · 11.8.2026
Associated Press · 10.8.2026
Business Wire · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Business Wire · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 5.6.2026
Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 30/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARKR currently scores 30/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ARKR's estimated fair value is -$5.71, which is 220.0% below the current price of $4.76. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ARKR's technical score is 7/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; NAV per share: $9.08.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$5.71 vs. price $4.76 (-220.0%); Operating margin: -2.5% (negative); Net margin: -6.9% (negative).
Yes — ARKR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 20 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEINSTEIN MICHAEL LAWRENCE | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2025 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $7.50 |
| WEINSTEIN MICHAEL LAWRENCE | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2025 | 944,461 | +3,000 | $7.50 |
| WEINSTEIN MICHAEL LAWRENCE | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2025 | 545 | +545 | $7.30 |
| WEINSTEIN MICHAEL LAWRENCE | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2025 | 942,961 | +545 | $7.30 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2025 | 12,125 | +12,125 | $7.48 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2025 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $6.71 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2025 | 20,916 | +20,916 | $6.82 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2024 | 3,301 | +3,301 | $15.73 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2024 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $15.23 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2024 | 4,000 | +4,000 | $15.40 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2024 | 1,578 | +1,578 | $14.56 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 15.5.2024 | 1,549 | +1,549 | $15.00 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 15.5.2024 | 3,322 | +3,322 | $15.30 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 14.5.2024 | 5,100 | +5,100 | $13.86 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 14.5.2024 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $14.63 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 14.5.2024 | 5,393 | +5,393 | $14.30 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 14.5.2024 | 3,451 | +3,451 | $14.64 |
| Sirica Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.1.2024 | 25,000 | +25,000 | — |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 21.12.2022 | 4,607 | +4,607 | $17.51 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 21.12.2022 | 10,165 | +10,165 | $16.74 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Open Market Purchase | 20.12.2022 | 10,335 | +10,335 | $16.36 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2022 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $21.01 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2022 | 6,000 | +6,000 | $20.95 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2022 | 4,979 | +4,979 | $20.91 |
| SATTERFIELD THOMAS A JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2022 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $20.94 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,594 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,825 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 12.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology