Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · CBOE
$26.93
▲ $1.57 (+6.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:41 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.73B
Day Range
$25.89 - $26.99
52-Week Range
$19.24 - $41.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$20.48
Resistance
$27.13
-31.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/17 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 22.6% / max drawdown 53.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
ARKB’s overall investor score of 55 reflects a mixed but cautiously optimistic profile, where technical and news-driven momentum partially offset significant fundamental and growth weaknesses. The technical category scores strongly (80) due to clear bullish signals—price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, positive MACD momentum, and a strong ADX trend indicator—but is tempered by overbought conditions (RSI 76.3, %K 99.8), suggesting potential short-term volatility. The news category (50) highlights conflicting narratives: positive ETF flow-driven optimism and Bitcoin price rebounds contrast with concerns over leverage and Treasury yield impacts, indicating market sentiment is highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts. However, fundamental and growth metrics are deeply concerning: negative return on equity (-6.7%) and assets (-6.6%) signal operational inefficiencies, while a catastrophic net income decline (-111.8%) underscores structural challenges. Valuation remains neutral (50), leaving room for interpretation, though the risk profile (42) is elevated by a historically volatile Calmar ratio (0.44) and a 53.3% max drawdown, reflecting high volatility relative to returns. The interplay of speculative momentum and underlying fragility creates a nuanced dynamic where external factors—like Bitcoin ETF flows or macroeconomic trends—could amplify either upside or downside risks.
ARKB exhibits strong bullish momentum with price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an ADX of 39.6 indicating a strong trend. However, the RSI (76.3) and %K (99.8) signal overbought conditions, suggesting potential short-term correction pressure.
Technical strength provides near-term support, but overbought indicators may trigger profit-taking or reversals if external catalysts fail to sustain momentum.
The ETF shows severe fundamental weaknesses, with negative return on equity (-6.7%) and return on assets (-6.6%), indicating poor profitability and asset utilization. These metrics suggest underlying operational or structural inefficiencies.
Negative ROE and ROA raise concerns about long-term sustainability and the ability to generate value from existing assets, which could erode investor confidence over time.
Net income growth has collapsed by -111.8%, signaling a catastrophic contraction in profitability. This aligns with the negative ROE and ROA, reinforcing concerns about the ETF’s ability to grow or stabilize revenue streams.
Such extreme income decline is a red flag for investors seeking growth, as it suggests the ETF’s exposure to volatile or declining underlying assets (e.g., cryptocurrencies) is intensifying.
Valuation data is neutral (50), with no explicit evidence of extreme over- or undervaluation provided. This leaves the assessment dependent on external comparables or market sentiment rather than intrinsic metrics.
Without clear valuation anchors, investors must rely on speculative drivers (e.g., Bitcoin ETF flows) to justify pricing, increasing reliance on macroeconomic or sector-specific tailwinds.
News sentiment is mixed, with positive coverage highlighting ETF flows and Bitcoin rebounds, while negative headlines warn of leverage risks and Treasury yield impacts. The balance suggests market sentiment is highly reactive to Bitcoin’s price action and institutional activity.
The volatility in news sentiment underscores that ARKB’s performance is closely tied to speculative narratives, which can shift rapidly based on external events.
Risk metrics are elevated, with a Calmar ratio of 0.44 (indicating high volatility relative to returns) and a 53.3% max drawdown over three years. The ATR (2.6% of price) further confirms frequent and sharp price swings.
Such volatility and drawdown risk profile suggests ARKB is a high-risk asset, where outsized gains may be accompanied by significant losses, particularly in downturns.
StockIQ conclusion
ARKB presents a complex profile where speculative momentum in cryptocurrency ETFs and Bitcoin’s recent price action drive near-term optimism, supported by strong technical indicators. However, severe fundamental weaknesses—including negative profitability and extreme income contraction—highlight structural vulnerabilities that could undermine long-term viability. The ETF’s risk profile remains high, with volatility and drawdown risks outweighing its relative performance gains. Investors should focus on external catalysts (e.g., ETF flows, Bitcoin trends) while acknowledging that ARKB’s value is heavily dependent on speculative drivers rather than traditional fundamentals. The balance between short-term speculative appeal and long-term fragility makes it a high-risk asset suited for portfolios with a tolerance for volatility.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $26.93
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 13 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
44
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
82
Risk
42
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
42
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB)** highlights its role in Bitcoin’s resurgence, emphasizing strong ETF inflows—including a $730 million surge and weekly inflows exceeding $1.9 billion—as key drivers of Bitcoin’s price recovery above $80,000. Analysts note ARKB’s smaller asset base amplifies the impact of institutional inflows, positioning it as a standout performer amid broader Bitcoin ETF demand. The focus also includes macro trends like falling Treasury yields and Treasury liquidity shifts fueling crypto demand, with ARKB frequently mentioned alongside competitors like IBIT and FBTC.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ark 21Shares Bitcoin ETF. News trend score: 38. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 4 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
42
Technical
82
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+29%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-5
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ARKB’s psychology is dominated by **anchoring**, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (2.5%) suggests traders are fixating on that level as a psychological barrier. While **FOMO** (45) and **euphoria** (31) signals are present—evidenced by momentum and elevated valuation—neither is extreme. The **narrative gap** (61 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect where optimism may outpace tangible fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders break free from the resistance anchor, or will it hold as a self-fulfilling reference?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:05 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Bitcoin ETFs logged $1.9 billion in weekly inflows" (Benzinga #6)"
""incremental institutional inflows have an outsized impact on AUM growth" (SeekingAlpha #5)"
""Bitcoin reclaims $80K as Treasury liquidity and ETF inflows fuel its 2026 comeback" (Yahoo #4)"
""ARKB's smaller asset base means incremental inflows matter more" (SeekingAlpha #5)"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
ARKB’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological clashes between momentum-driven and fundamental approaches. Jesse Livermore’s near-perfect score highlights a strong upward price trend that aligns with his tactical, short-term trading principles, while the majority of value-oriented investors—like Graham, Fisher, and Lynch—struggle due to insufficient data to apply their rigorous frameworks. Meanwhile, behavioral economists like Mackay and Veblen detect crowd-driven excitement and speculative growth patterns, respectively, contrasting sharply with the passive skepticism of efficient-market theorists (Malkiel/Bogle) and the cautious cycle analysis of Nelson. The middle-ground methodologies (Marks, Housel) acknowledge moderate potential but flag execution risks, illustrating how ARKB’s speculative nature either thrives under trend-following or gets dismissed as overvalued or data-deficient.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 60
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 34
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 33
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 6
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-6.7%
ROA
-6.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
—
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 10 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Ark 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARKB currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ARKB's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 64.7 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 22.6% / max drawdown 53.3%); Return on equity (ROE): -6.7% (negative); Net income growth: -111.8%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ARKB.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
167,584 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 266,386 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology