Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$31.02
▼ $0.36 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:00 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$30.90 - $31.42
52-Week Range
$27.22 - $35.07
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$31.15
Resistance
$35.07
AMH is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-6.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 1/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.13 (3y annualized return -4.2% / max drawdown 33.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
6
Risk
50
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
46
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **American Homes 4 Rent (AMH)** has focused on its valuation and growth potential as a residential REIT. Analysts highlight its strong occupancy rates, fundamentals, and undervalued position amid broader apartment market recovery, particularly as supply slows. The company was frequently mentioned alongside peers like Essex Property and Equity LifeStyle in industry outlooks, with some upgrades to "Buy" due to regulatory clarity and favorable FFO growth. No major controversies or negative developments were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Homes 4 Rent Common Shares of Beneficial Interest. News trend score: 74. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
92
Fundamentals
46
Technical
6
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme anchoring (99) at support (0.0%) suggests traders are rigidly fixating on this level, ignoring broader signals like muted momentum (-5.4% ROC) or peer underperformance. Herding (47) appears passive, not driven, as AMH lags peers (-0.5% vs. -0.8%). Overconfidence (14) and euphoria (18) are dampened by DCF premiums and weak momentum, while FOMO (10) and panic (22) are muted by low volatility (0.87x ATR). The key question: *Will traders break free from the 0.0% anchor if support holds?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"strong occupancy, FFO growth"
"undervalued P/FFO"
"apartment supply slows, occupancy stays strong"
"affordability pressures support rental demand"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for AMH reveal a stark divide between cyclical and fundamental investors. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score suggests the stock aligns with his oversold-cycle timing, while Edgar Lawrence Smith and Charles Mackay see it as a long-term hold—Smith even calling it a 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate. Meanwhile, more cautious or contrarian voices like Jesse Livermore and Benjamin Graham’s defensive framework dismiss it outright, with Livermore flagging a negative trend and Graham’s rules failing entirely. The middle-ground approaches—from Howard Marks’ mixed valuation to Jack Schwager’s indecision—reflect uncertainty about whether the stock’s growth justifies its price, while efficient-market theorists like Malkiel and Bogle question its active-picking merit. The contrast highlights whether AMH’s appeal lies in timing, fundamentals, or sheer speculation.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 83
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 76
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 20
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.3%
ROA
3.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.18
Cash
$108.52M
Total Debt
$5.10B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.72
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.9.2026 | $0.330 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.330 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.330 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.330 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.330 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.300 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.300 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$31.02
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$27.98
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-9.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $906.05M | $831.24M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $979.67M | $824.57M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $1.04B | $803.76M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $1.09B | $769.66M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.11B | $723.76M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$823.68M
Terminal Value
$17.56B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$11.41B
Enterprise Value
$15.37B
Net Debt
$4.99B
Equity Value
$10.38B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$18.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$18.61
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 10 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
American Homes 4 Rent Common Shares of Beneficial Interest (AMH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMH currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMH's estimated fair value is $27.98, which is 9.8% below the current price of $31.02. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMH's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.7% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.13 (3y annualized return -4.2% / max drawdown 33.4%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — AMH has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 25 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $22.43 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 100 | +100 | $22.39 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 1,800 | +1,800 | $22.46 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $22.39 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 200 | +200 | $22.35 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 700 | +700 | $22.39 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 200 | +200 | $22.35 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 22,000 | +1,000 | $22.39 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 2,000 | +700 | $22.39 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 21,000 | +2,000 | $22.43 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 500 | +200 | $22.35 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 17,200 | +1,800 | $22.46 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 600 | +100 | $22.39 |
| BENHAM DOUGLAS N | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 18,521 | +500 | $22.51 |
| BENHAM DOUGLAS N | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 500 | +500 | $22.51 |
| BENHAM DOUGLAS N | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 18,021 | +1,500 | $22.60 |
| BENHAM DOUGLAS N | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 46,717 | +2,000 | $23.70 |
| BENHAM DOUGLAS N | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $23.70 |
| BENHAM DOUGLAS N | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $22.60 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 15,400 | +2,000 | $22.85 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 21,000 | +1,000 | $22.70 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 19,000 | +2,000 | $22.79 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $22.85 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $22.79 |
| CORRIGAN JACK E | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $22.70 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,815,485 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,809,173 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 26.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology