Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$4.63
▼ $0.07 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:16 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$2.77B
Day Range
$4.63 - $4.71
52-Week Range
$3.29 - $5.47
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$4.38
Resistance
$5.47
AMBP is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+22.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 60.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $0.41 vs. price $4.63 (-91.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
29
Risk
48
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
38
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.** has centered on its potential sale or restructuring, with multiple reports indicating the company is exploring the divestment of its metal packaging division. Analysts have also highlighted strong financial performance, including a 17.7% revenue increase and higher adjusted EBITDA in Q2, reinforcing a "Buy" rating. Deutsche Bank set a $5.20 price target, while SEC filings suggest strategic shifts in ownership or valuation. The focus remains on financial outperformance amid restructuring speculation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
63
Fundamentals
38
Technical
29
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence (score 45) stems from a glaring disconnect between AMBP’s weak price momentum and strong fundamental growth, alongside extreme valuation. This suggests traders may be overestimating future performance despite observable underperformance. The narrative gap (15 points) further implies a misalignment between market expectations and reality, as euphoria (28) persists despite neutral RSI and negative ROC. The key question is whether this overconfidence will persist or correct as fundamentals fail to justify valuation. Herding and FOMO remain absent, indicating isolated rather than contagious behavior.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 03:26 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ardagh Holdings pursues sale of metal packaging division (Article 2)"
"Q2 revenue increased 17.7% to $1.71 billion, adjusted EBITDA reached $240 million (Article 9)"
"Ardagh Holdings S.A. Files Amendment to Schedule 13D with SEC (Article 5 & 6)"
"Price target increased by 15.73% to $5.25 (Article 7)"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 19/100
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 72
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 44
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 38
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 26
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 19
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
12.4%
Operating Margin
4.4%
Net Margin
0.2%
EBITDA Margin
12.9%
ROE
-1.6%
ROA
0.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.02
Cash
—
Total Debt
$4.42B
Current Ratio
1.06
Debt/Equity
-6.47
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.9.2026 | $0.100 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.100 |
| 6.8.2025 | $0.100 |
| 5.5.2025 | $0.100 |
| 4.5.2025 | $0.100 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.100 |
| 12.3.2025 | $0.100 |
| 5.12.2024 | $0.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$4.63
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$0.41
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-91.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5% | $291.29M | $267.24M |
| 2 | 4.8% | $305.21M | $256.89M |
| 3 | 4.0% | $317.48M | $245.15M |
| 4 | 3.3% | $327.83M | $232.24M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $336.03M | $218.39M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$276.00M
Terminal Value
$5.30B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.44B
Enterprise Value
$4.66B
Net Debt
$4.42B
Equity Value
$244.83M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$1.14
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.14
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Packaging Gateway · 14.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Packaging Dive · 13.8.2026
PR Newswire · 13.8.2026
PR Newswire · 13.8.2026
Fintel · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
Packaging Gateway · 28.7.2026
ChartMill · 23.7.2026
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMBP currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMBP's estimated fair value is $0.41, which is 91.2% below the current price of $4.63. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMBP's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 60.0%; Net income growth: 466.7%; Debt/equity: -6.47.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $0.41 vs. price $4.63 (-91.2%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.33 (3y annualized return 13.4% / max drawdown 40.8%).
Yes — AMBP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 2 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blunt Abigail | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 120,007 | +6,859 | — |
| Blunt Abigail | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 6,859 | +6,859 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,772,316 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,127,795 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology