Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$2.18
▼ $0.04 (-1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:16 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$313.61M
Day Range
$2.18 - $2.23
52-Week Range
$2.18 - $8.03
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$2.18
Resistance
$2.84
AIV is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-72.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 616.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$11.01 vs. price $2.18 (-605.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
58
Value
48
Momentum
6
Risk
36
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
61
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIMCo) is limited to a single, brief mention in a financial news headline from June 2026, where it was listed among the top premarket decliners without further details. Without additional context or substantive reporting, no recurring themes or notable events can be summarized beyond this isolated reference.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Apartment Investment and Management Company. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 0 vs. 0 out of the last 1 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
61
Technical
6
Valuation
48
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-25%
Market Narrative
33
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
-7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are closely monitoring the 2.7% support level, potentially using it as a reference point for entry or exit decisions. Herding is active but muted, as the stock’s slight outperformance today contrasts with broader peer underperformance. Loss aversion is present, given the prolonged decline and elevated volume, but panic or euphoria remain absent. The key question is whether the stock can sustain its relative outperformance or if traders will revert to anchoring behavior near support, especially if volume trends decline. The narrow narrative-reality gap (1 point) indicates minimal misalignment between market perception and fundamentals.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:34 PM
What could change this?
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AIV reflects deep methodological differences between value, growth, and cyclical investors. At the top, Mackay’s near-perfect score suggests no crowd-driven euphoria, while Marks (Market Cycle) and Nelson both see it as favorably positioned within a broader economic cycle—though Marks’ lower score hints at caution over already high expectations. Meanwhile, Graham’s two approaches (Defensive and Enterprising) split between cautious attraction and a deeper statistical discount, illustrating how his framework can both validate and qualify a stock. On the growth side, Lynch and Veblen agree on potential upside, but Fisher’s lower score signals a lack of Fisher’s signature ‘exceptional quality,’ while Schwager’s disciplined nod contrasts with Livermore’s outright rejection due to trend alignment. The bottom half, from Loeb’s risk aversion to Bagehot’s lack of data, underscores how stability, balance-sheet strength, and trend adherence dominate the ‘no’ cases—leaving only a narrow band of methodologies that would even consider it.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 87
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 75
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 72
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 59
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 264 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
395.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
151.2%
ROA
32.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.95
Cash
$394.89M
Total Debt
$738.63M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
2.04
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.6.2026 | $1.300 |
| 27.2.2026 | $1.450 |
| 16.10.2025 | $2.230 |
| 14.1.2025 | $0.600 |
| 13.9.2022 | $0.020 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$2.18
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$11.01
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-605.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-86.95M | $-79.77M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-84.24M | $-70.90M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-83.18M | $-64.23M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-83.70M | $-59.30M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-85.80M | $-55.76M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-91.53M
Terminal Value
$-1.35B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-879.31M
Enterprise Value
$-1.21B
Net Debt
$343.73M
Equity Value
$-1.55B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.48
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 1 articles.
MT Newswires · 4.6.2026
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AIV currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AIV's estimated fair value is -$11.01, which is 605.0% below the current price of $2.18. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AIV's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 616.0%; Net income growth: 626.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$11.01 vs. price $2.18 (-605.0%); Calmar: -0.42 (3y annualized return -32.6% / max drawdown 76.8%); Debt/equity: 2.04.
Yes — AIV has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dreyer Kellie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 92,782 | -4,953 | $2.69 |
| Dreyer Kellie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 4,953 | -4,953 | $2.69 |
| Stanfield Lynn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.4.2026 | 440,323 | -54,236 | $4.10 |
| Powell Wesley William | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.4.2026 | 631,648 | -91,488 | $4.10 |
| Johnson Jennifer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.4.2026 | 291,355 | -38,497 | $4.10 |
| Powell Wesley William | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.4.2026 | 91,488 | -91,488 | $4.10 |
| Stanfield Lynn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.4.2026 | 54,236 | -54,236 | $4.10 |
| Johnson Jennifer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.4.2026 | 38,497 | -38,497 | $4.10 |
| Dreyer Kellie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 97,735 | -3,313 | $5.88 |
| Powell Wesley William | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 723,136 | -100,170 | $5.88 |
| Johnson Jennifer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 329,852 | -12,977 | $5.88 |
| Stanfield Lynn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 494,559 | -17,649 | $5.88 |
| Stanfield Lynn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 17,649 | -17,649 | $5.88 |
| Dreyer Kellie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 3,313 | -3,313 | $5.88 |
| Johnson Jennifer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 12,977 | -12,977 | $5.88 |
| Powell Wesley William | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 100,170 | -100,170 | $5.88 |
| Dreyer Kellie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.1.2026 | 101,048 | -603 | $5.88 |
| Stanfield Lynn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.1.2026 | 512,208 | -2,673 | $5.88 |
| Johnson Jennifer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.1.2026 | 342,829 | -1,957 | $5.88 |
| Dreyer Kellie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.1.2026 | 603 | -603 | $5.88 |
| Stanfield Lynn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.1.2026 | 2,673 | -2,673 | $5.88 |
| Johnson Jennifer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.1.2026 | 1,957 | -1,957 | $5.88 |
| Powell Wesley William | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.1.2026 | 833,875 | +215,420 | — |
| Stanfield Lynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.1.2026 | 519,147 | +48,829 | — |
| Powell Wesley William | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.1.2026 | 823,306 | -10,569 | $5.85 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,370,461 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,628,992 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 25.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology