Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$2.08
▼ $0.04 (-1.9%)
Market data updated: 09/22 01:51 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/09/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$2.04 - $2.08
52-Week Range
$0.83 - $3.07
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$1.14
Resistance
$2.08
-48.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 44.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -186.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
13d ago · $1.76
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 71)
What happened after
13d ago · $1.76
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 59 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
85
Risk
34
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
18
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Senmiao Technology Limited. News trend score: 62. Reason: 4 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
63
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
31
Investors appear highly excited (63), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (31).
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
18
Technical
85
Valuation
50
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+68%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
31
Narrative Gap
+41
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 75/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 2/100
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 75
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 59
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 58
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 44
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 32
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 28
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 27
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 24
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 9
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 5
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 2
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 269 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
13.6%
Operating Margin
-186.8%
Net Margin
-340.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-324.9%
ROA
-100.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.97
Cash
$3.60M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.53
Debt/Equity
0.51
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$1.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 15 articles.
GlobeNewswire · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
ChartMill · 17.8.2026
ChartMill · 11.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 11.8.2026
ChartMill · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.8.2026
ChartMill · 20.7.2026
MT Newswires · 20.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 20.7.2026
Benzinga · 20.7.2026
Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AIHS currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AIHS's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 44.4%; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -186.8% (negative); Net margin: -340.9% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AIHS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 14 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang Sichun | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 18,182 | +18,182 | — |
| Li Chunhai | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 4,545 | +4,545 | — |
| Lin Xiaojuan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 18,182 | +18,182 | — |
| Wen Xi | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 18,182 | +18,182 | — |
| Gao Jie | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 18,182 | +18,182 | — |
| Liu Haitao | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 9,091 | +9,091 | — |
| DAVIS TRENT D | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 18,182 | +18,182 | — |
| Zhang Xiaoyuan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.10.2020 | 13,636 | +13,636 | — |
| Gao Jie | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.1.2020 | 30,303 | +30,303 | — |
| Lin Xiaojuan | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.1.2020 | 30,303 | +30,303 | — |
| Wang Sichun | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.1.2020 | 30,303 | +30,303 | — |
| Wen Xi | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.1.2020 | 30,303 | +30,303 | — |
| DAVIS TRENT D | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.1.2020 | 30,303 | +30,303 | — |
| Wen Xi | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2018 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
325,030 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 243,654 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
19.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 19.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology