Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Basic Materials · ·
$35.72
▼ $0.04 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:44 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$15.00B
Day Range
$35.29 - $36.10
52-Week Range
$27.05 - $55.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
Support
$27.05
Resistance
$39.11
AGI is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+14.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $13.72 vs. price $35.72 (-61.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (71/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
70
$39.02
Now
58
$35.72
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
55
Value
38
Momentum
47
Risk
62
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
80
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
The recent media coverage on **Alamos Gold Inc.** has focused on its stock performance amid broader gold market trends, with analysts noting its potential undervaluation despite strong earnings. The company also saw a board change as Claire M. C. Kennedy left to take a diplomatic role, while market activity—including options trading and short interest—suggested investor speculation. Gold’s volatility and central bank demand were key themes, though no direct Alamos-specific developments beyond these were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alamos Gold Inc. Class A Common. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 6 vs. 6 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
80
Technical
47
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+7
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers’ underperformance, possibly reacting to broader sector weakness or negative catalysts. Overconfidence (45) and euphoria (33) persist despite weak momentum, indicating investors may still overvalue fundamentals or growth potential. The narrative gap (19) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and current price action. The key question is whether herding reflects a rational reassessment or a temporary pullback before further mispricing correction.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gold has spent 2026 doing things it has never done before... Goldman Sachs Research now forecasts the metal will reach US$4,900 per troy ounce by the end of 2026"
"Investors need to pay close attention to AGI stock based on the movements in the options market lately."
"Alamos Gold Inc. announced the departure of Claire M. C. Kennedy from the Board of Directors, effective August 31"
"Alamos Gold fits Peter Lynch's GARP strategy with 27.7% EPS growth, PEG 0.65, low debt, and strong ROE"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: the bullish growth-focused investors and the more cautious, value-oriented or market-neutral ones. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith both see AGI as a high-potential 'buy and hold' candidate, with Lynch emphasizing underpriced growth and Smith calling it a decade-long hold. Meanwhile, Fisher and Bagehot highlight strong fundamentals and liquidity, though their scores are lower, suggesting nuanced but still positive views. In contrast, the more skeptical frameworks—like Graham’s defensive criteria, Schwager’s disciplined wizards, and the efficient-market proponents—reject the stock outright, either for lacking safety margins or failing to justify active selection over passive indexing. The middle ground, represented by Marks, Housel, and Veblen, acknowledges potential but warns of elevated expectations or cyclical risks, creating a tension between optimism and caution.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 78
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 73
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 66
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 64
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 64
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 38
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 24
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
55.3%
Operating Margin
60.7%
Net Margin
49.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
19.9%
ROA
13.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.11
Cash
$623.10M
Total Debt
$200.00M
Current Ratio
2.00
Debt/Equity
0.05
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.9.2026 | $0.040 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.040 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.040 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.040 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.040 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.025 |
| 11.6.2025 | $0.025 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.025 |
| 12.3.2025 | $0.025 |
| 5.12.2024 | $0.025 |
| 4.12.2024 | $0.025 |
| 12.9.2024 | $0.025 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$35.72
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$13.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-61.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $317.02M | $290.84M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $342.78M | $288.51M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $364.20M | $281.23M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $380.14M | $269.30M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $389.64M | $253.24M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$288.20M
Terminal Value
$6.14B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.99B
Enterprise Value
$5.38B
Net Debt
$-423.10M
Equity Value
$5.80B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$10.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 8 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
CNW Group · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 7.9.2026
Alamos Gold Inc. Class A Common (AGI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGI currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AGI's estimated fair value is $13.72, which is 61.6% below the current price of $35.72. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AGI's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 204.3%; Net income growth: 211.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $13.72 vs. price $35.72 (-61.6%); Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — AGI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,302,342 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,297,305 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
33.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 34.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology