Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$23.00
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/18 12:41 PM
Fundamentals updated: 08/12/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$22.97 - $23.00
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$22.43
Resistance
$23.00
+21.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 19/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $32.47 vs. price $23.00 (+41.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
RSI
RSI 86.9 — approaching overbought territory
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
55
Value
62
Momentum
82
Risk
64
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Affinity Bancshares Inc. has primarily centered on its acquisition by Fidelity Bank, which was finalized in late July 2026. The news highlights the completed deal involving Affinity Bancshares and its subsidiary, Affinity Bank. Earlier in 2026, the company was occasionally mentioned in broader lists of "undiscovered gems" or promising small-cap stocks by financial analysis platforms, but these references lack specific details about Affinity Bancshares.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Affinity Bancshares Inc. Common Stock (MD). News trend score: 44. Reason: 2 of the last 10 articles are negative, versus 1 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
60
Technical
82
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
31
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-21
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s fixation on anchoring—with AFBI priced exactly at resistance—suggests traders are rigidly anchored to a single price level, ignoring overbought conditions (RSI 93) and valuation gaps. FOMO and euphoria coexist but are muted by low volume and neutral peer performance, while overconfidence hints at selective optimism. The key question: will traders break free from the resistance anchor, or will the narrative gap (-21) widen as fundamentals diverge from price action?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:57 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Fidelity Bank Completes Affinity Bancshares Acquisition"
"3 Promising Small Caps"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value/cycle-sensitive methodologies. Peter Lynch, Morgan Housel, and Philip Fisher all see it as a high-quality, long-term opportunity—Lynch and Housel emphasizing its underappreciated growth potential, while Fisher highlights its exceptional fundamentals. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham (both Defensive and Enterprising) and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) pull back, citing valuation concerns or cyclical risks, with the Enterprising Investor scoring it even lower for not meeting its looser margin-of-safety thresholds. The contrast between the top-tier scores (100s) and the bottom-tier (9 or 17) underscores a fundamental tension: whether AFBI’s growth justifies its price or if it’s already priced for perfection, leaving little room for further upside. Even trend-followers like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager are cautiously optimistic, while cycle-aware investors like Nelson and Veblen warn of overbought conditions or speculative overreach.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 94
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 83
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 79
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 71
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 42
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 17
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 243 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$22.43
Range Bottom
$23.00
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
29.0%
Net Margin
22.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
6.6%
ROA
0.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.33
Cash
$53.85M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 13.3.2025 | $1.500 |
| 12.3.2025 | $1.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$23.00
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$32.47
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+41.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $12.34M | $11.32M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $13.34M | $11.23M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $14.18M | $10.95M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $14.80M | $10.48M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $15.17M | $9.86M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$11.22M
Terminal Value
$239.16M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$155.44M
Enterprise Value
$209.28M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$209.28M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$20.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.89
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 10 articles.
MT Newswires · 31.7.2026
Business Wire · 31.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.6.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.6.2026
Simply Wall St. · 29.5.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.5.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.5.2026
Simply Wall St. · 25.5.2026
Simply Wall St. · 25.5.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.5.2026
Affinity Bancshares Inc. Common Stock (MD) (AFBI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AFBI currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AFBI's estimated fair value is $32.47, which is 41.2% above the current price of $23.00. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AFBI's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $32.47 vs. price $23.00 (+41.2%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 55.4%; Free cash flow growth: 76.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: RSI 86.9 — approaching overbought territory; %K 100.0 — overbought; Return on equity (ROE): 6.6% — weak.
Yes — AFBI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 19 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEHMAN KENNETH R | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | -45,316 | — |
| Fortson William D. Jr. | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Richardson Bob W. | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Stone Edward P. | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Ginn Marshall L. | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Roberts Howard G | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Ross Mark J | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Nelson Clark | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Galazka Elizabeth | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Cooney Edward John | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Vickers Robert | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Reich Robin S | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Pajot Brandi C | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Shore Teak | Disposition to the Company | 1.8.2026 | 0 | -20,000 | — |
| Nelson Clark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 12,129 | -440 | $22.60 |
| Nelson Clark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.11.2025 | 12,569 | -1,400 | $19.36 |
| Vickers Robert | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.11.2025 | 2,608 | -192 | $19.36 |
| Pajot Brandi C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.11.2025 | 21,415 | -274 | $19.36 |
| Vickers Robert | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2025 | 2,800 | -7,565 | $19.47 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,147 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 10,574 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 30.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology