Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$25.70
▲ $0.12 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/18 10:10 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$2.31B
Day Range
$25.67 - $25.70
52-Week Range
$23.78 - $25.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
ADAMM is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+1.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/23 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 196.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $19.92 vs. price $25.70 (-22.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
55
Risk
50
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
51
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Adamas Trust Inc.** has highlighted its strong financial performance and strategic growth, particularly in Q2 2026. Key themes include record **Exposure at Default (EAD) growth**, a **11.1% dividend increase**, and a **public offering of senior notes** to expand capital. Analysts praise its accelerating earnings, revenue, and momentum, though concerns about **high debt and payout risks** persist. Comparisons between its preferred stock (ADAML) and senior notes (ADAMI) have also drawn attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Adamas Trust Inc. 7.875% Series E Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. News trend score: 74. Reason: 5 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
51
Technical
55
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 91) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.5% resistance gap, likely treating it as a psychological barrier. Overconfidence (26) and euphoria (14) hint at detached valuation (+29% above DCF), while herding (48) shows relative underperformance today. The key question is whether the resistance break will trigger a re-evaluation of the anchored price level or if traders remain anchored despite minor momentum divergence. Narrative-reality divergence (gap: 7) may further entrench anchoring if perceptions of fair value remain elevated.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:29 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Adamas Trust (ADAMM) clears Navellier's 8 growth rules with surging earnings, revenue, and analyst revisions"
"Adamas Trust Increases Quarterly Common Stock Dividend by 11.1% to $0.30 Per Share"
"Record EAD Growth and Strategic Investments"
"high debt and payout risks warrant caution"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-oriented methodologies. Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher’s near-perfect scores suggest it fits their criteria for high-growth potential, with Lynch emphasizing underpriced growth and Fisher’s model struggling due to insufficient fundamental data—implying it might still pass his rigorous qualitative filters. Meanwhile, Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith’s high scores reinforce its appeal as a patient, long-term compounder, while Walter Bagehot and Benjamin Graham’s low scores reflect skepticism about balance-sheet strength and valuation discipline. On the other end, the efficient-market camp and Jack Schwager’s quantitative wizards dismiss it outright, seeing no clear edge or trading setup, while Howard Marks and Thorstein Veblen flag potential overvaluation or profit-margin concerns. The contrast between Lynch’s enthusiasm and Graham’s outright rejection highlights whether the stock’s growth justifies its price—or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 97
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 90
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 88
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 76
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 45
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 37
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 33
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.4%
ROA
1.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.12
Cash
$210.33M
Total Debt
$735.83M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.52
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.655 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.648 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.677 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.703 |
| 1.7.2025 | $0.692 |
| 1.4.2025 | $0.687 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.492 |
| 1.10.2024 | $0.492 |
| 1.7.2024 | $0.492 |
| 28.3.2024 | $0.492 |
| 28.12.2023 | $0.492 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.492 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$25.70
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$19.92
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-22.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $138.47M | $127.04M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $149.73M | $126.02M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $159.08M | $122.84M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $166.04M | $117.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $170.19M | $110.61M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$125.89M
Terminal Value
$2.68B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.74B
Enterprise Value
$2.35B
Net Debt
$525.50M
Equity Value
$1.82B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$15.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 16 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.8.2026
ChartMill · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Adamas Trust Inc. 7.875% Series E Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (ADAMM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ADAMM currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ADAMM's estimated fair value is $19.92, which is 22.5% below the current price of $25.70. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ADAMM's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 196.5%; Free cash flow growth: 1290.3%; Net income growth: 340.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $19.92 vs. price $25.70 (-22.5%); Calmar: 0.41 (3y annualized return 3.9% / max drawdown 9.5%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — ADAMM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pendergast Lisa A | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Cheng Gena | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Mumma Steven R | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Norcutt Steven G | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Greenberg Audrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 18,678 | +18,678 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 18,678 | -18,678 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 2,237 | -2,237 | $8.41 |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 5,827 | -5,827 | $8.41 |
| Nario-Eng Kristine Rimando | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 751 | -751 | $8.41 |
| Nario-Eng Kristine Rimando | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 61,989 | +61,989 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 127,321 | +127,321 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 216,711 | +216,711 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 84,737 | -84,737 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 41,032 | -41,032 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 19,140 | -19,140 | $7.30 |
| Mah Nicholas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 14,509 | -14,509 | $7.30 |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 34,179 | -34,179 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 44,640 | -44,640 | $7.30 |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 34,179 | +34,179 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 48,948 | -48,948 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 32,122 | -32,122 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 26,784 | -26,784 | $7.30 |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 21,455 | -21,455 | $7.30 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,612 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,209 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 16.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology